Monday March 22, 2010 2:29 AM ET
SmartMoney
Published July 28, 2009  |  A A A
SmartMoney Magazine by Daren Fonda (Author Archive)

ETFs (Finally) Break Into 401(k)s

FOR YEARS, investors have grumbled that there aren’t enough investment choices in their 401(k) plans—and grew even more disgruntled after losing a good chunk of their retirement funds in the crash. So you’d think getting access to one of the hottest investment products of the past few years would be good news. Too bad it’s more a case of being careful what you wish for.

ETF firms have long been eyeing the $2.3 trillion 401(k) jackpot. But until recently, companies that offered 401(k) retirement plans weren’t inclined to include exchange-traded funds. ETFs are baskets of stocks or other securities that trade as a single unit, a structure that can quickly become a record-keeping nightmare for firms that run the plans. That may be about to change, though: Those so-called plan administrators have recently found ways to overcome the record-keeping and trading issues that have hampered ETFs in the past. Already, Barclays, one of the biggest players in the game, has launched a new program to help financial advisers get its iShares ETFs into 401(k) accounts.

The tactic? Aim for 401(k) plans that want more cost-efficient options. Meanwhile, State Street Global Advisors, seller of the famous “spider” ETFs, is trying to get its foot in the corporate suite by offering retirement-oriented “target date” ETFs. Target-date funds have already achieved special status in many plans, despite their poor performance in the crash, and State Street aims “to play a part in the future,” says Anthony Rochte, senior managing director at State Street Global Advisors.

But the introduction of ETFs into 401(k) plans could be a mixed blessing. Typically, ETFs are cheaper than comparable mutual funds, but employees of large companies aren’t likely to see lower fees—big firms already can get rock-bottom fees on most funds, says Pamela Hess, director of retirement research at Hewitt Associates. Plus, the tax advantages of ETFs are minimized when held in a tax-deferred account like a 401(k). ETFs could still have broad appeal for small and midsize firms looking for lower-cost investments to include in their 401(k) plans. Nevertheless, says Rick Meigs, president of 401khelpcenter.com, “there’s no groundswell of demand” for ETFs by 401(k) plan sponsors.


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
ErnieB123$

1 Comments
ETF'S ARE THE FINANCIAL COMMUNTIES LATEST SCAM PRODUCT

WHEN IS THE FINANCIAL COMMUNITY GOING TO TRULY ADMIT TO THE INVESTING PUBLIC WHAT "ETF'S" REALLY ARE? WHEN IS THE SEC GOING TO REQUIRE FULL
ETF'S ARE THE LATEST FINANCIAL SCAM BY WALL STREET
DISCLOSURE AND LABELING LIKE THE FDA DOES ON ALL PRODUCTS YOU BUY AT THE STORE.
"ETF's" ARE NOT A REAL INVESTMENT BUT A DERIVATIVE AND SHOULD BE LABLED AS SUCH. THE BEST EXAMPLE OF MISS INFORMATION WAS IN, A WJS ARTICLE THAT EXPLAINED WHAT AN ETF WAS THIS WAY "ONCE THE COMPANY RAISES THE MONEY THEY START SELLING SHARES." THAT SEEMS SOMEWHAT SIMPLE AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND. BUT HERE IS HOW THEY RAISE THE MONEY. THEY BORROW THE SHARES FORM AN INSTITUTION WHICH CAN BE A MUTUAL FUND, TRUST FUND ETC. THEY THEN HAVE A BANK HOLD THE STOCKS THEY BORROWED IN TRUST FOR THEM. THEY THEN SELL SHARES TO THE PUBLIC BASED ON THE DOLLAR VALUE OF THE SHARES THEY BORROWED. THE SHARE OWNERS OF THE ETF'S DO NOT OWN ANY REAL ASSET, JUST THE ...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: seeuoutside
Except that I prefer to pick my own investments. Further, research shows time and again that performance is no better when hiring so-called experts and only drives up the costs. Perhaps I am not like most 401K investors, but I see no real benefit to hiring yet another manager. Give me index funds, ETF's, and some lost-cost mutual funds.
Posted by: investnr
Submitted by Darwin Abrahamson, CEO of Invest n Retire, LLC.

Offering 3 ETFs as investment option with mutual funds is not going to help Seeuoutside or any other 401(k) participant. Cost is an advantage with ETFs over mutual funds but not the major advantage. 401(k) plan fiduciaries should hire 3(38) investments mangers to build asset allocation models and manage the models for participants instead of forcing their participants to pick funds. Investment mangers using ETFs will help all participants increase their returns and increase their goal of having an adequate retirement income.
Posted by: seeuoutside
We just had 3 new ETF offerings in our 401K come on board. However, I was disappointed to see that they were really no less expensive than the index mutual funds already available, so I can see why there is no demand for ETF's in 401K plans. I believe cost is primarily the only real advantage of ETF's anyhow, so why bother?
Advertisements
 
Retrieving data...