Sunday March 21, 2010 4:29 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published March 6, 2009  |  A A A
Ahead of the Curve by Donald Luskin (Author Archive)

Even Worse Than the Great Depression

Over the last couple years I loved to ridicule all the scaremongers who always said this, that or the other thing is “the worst since the Great Depression.” I stand by my ridicule, for the most part -- those prophets of doom were mostly broken clocks who look right now just by sheer luck. But there's no question now that things have gotten quite bad in the economy and the markets.

So let me do the preachers of Armageddon one better. Today's stock market isn't just the “worst since the Great Depression,” like they're so fond of saying. No, it's even worse than the Great Depression.

Take a look at the chart, below. It shows the daily progress of the S&P 500 in terms of percentage change from the very top. The brown line is the change from the recent all-time highs on October 9, 2007. The blue line is the change from the all-time highs just before the Great Depression, September 6, 1929.

As of yesterday's close (Thursday, March 5), the S&P 500 has lost 56.4% from its all-time highs 513 days ago. At the same point in the bear market associated with the Great Depression, that is at the 513 day mark, the S&P 500 had only lost -- only! -- 49%.

In other words, to be no worse than the catastrophe that happened to stocks in the Great Depression, the S&P 500 today would have to rally 17%.

Looking forward, if stocks are going to continue along the same bleak path they followed during the Great Depression, then I have good news and bad news. The good news is that we're halfway through it. In the Great Depression, the bear market lasted 997 days. We passed that halfway mark two weeks ago. Maybe that's what Barack Obama meant when he said, as he signed the so-called “stimulus” bill, that this was “the beginning of the end.”

He signed that bill on Friday the 13th, by the way. Which brings me to the bad news. By the time the bear market was over in the Great Depression, on that 997th day, the S&P 500 had lost 86.2% from the top. To match that, we'd have to fall another 68.3% from here. Hmmm…maybe that's what the president meant when he said this was “the beginning of the end.”



We can't blame President Obama for the mess he inherited. But we can definitely blame him for making it worse. Stocks are off 28.4% since his election, 15.2% since his inauguration, and 17.2% since his so-called “stimulus” bill was enacted. To say the very least, whatever he's doing, it ain't working.

I have to say I'm a little surprised. I didn't support Obama in the campaign, but I had expected that the wave of good feelings from the election of such a charismatic man would help lift the economy and the markets out of their doldrums. And while I don't agree at all with his liberal orientation in economic policy, at least I thought he was generally a centrist who wouldn't muck things up too much or too quickly. I even hoped his so-called “stimulus” bill would at least have a placebo effect.

1
2
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: Lou12142002
We are all intelligent enough to identify the problems! Are we smart enough to look at some alternative solutions? Or are we brain-washed into thinking our current capitalism-gone-corrupt system is the only way to go? My friend, you're right, things have not changed; things are still the same. A 'scarcity' greed driven economic/monetary policy is the 'enemy' of all free societies; the results are always the same, capitalism-gone-corrupt. And the government that we 'hire' to protect us does not protect us from that enemy. Why do we allow such a corrupt system if we are doomed to repeat this financial crisis over and over? Why do we accept this scam/scheme as the 'best' way for mankind to move forward? I found some interesting facts (backed up with data and its sources) at: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3932487043163636261
Please listen how our current 'scarcity' greed driven (capitalism-gone-corrupt) monetary/economic policy/system has and will continue to fail ... (Read m...(Read more of this comment)
vernhuffer

91 Comments
Hey you guys who have been blaming President Obama for the fact that the the recession is not ending, what is you Congressman doing? Maybe you live in a "red district". Did he hold up the vote on the stimulus bill until a couple of earmarks for the district were added? All the competent economists have been urging haste. Ringing the fire bell so to speak.
ejhickey

4 Comments
To u240018 :

I was comparing a forward leading economic indicator, the Dow Jones Average, over two similar periods in time and pointing out the difference is direction under two similar Democratic Presidents. Obviously not enough time has passed to allow trailing economic indictors cannot be affected by a stimulus bill that has only recently passed. The stock market however is a daily referendum on the concerns by investors about the future.

As far as the "bs statistics" from the past , how else would you evaluate this new president. Obama and his supporters are always looking back to the New Deal and drawing favorable comparisons. His head of the Council of Economic Advisors did so two ago in a public speech. I happened to compare one measure of performance in which Obama comes up short against FDR and you lable that "ridiculous" and "BS". That is not an answer , that is surrender.

History is important to evaluate present event, even though...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: u240018
This entire argument is idiotic. I tire of the countless data comparisons to past events. Especially when the data is selectively plucked to fit the author's pre-determined argument. So... just because the chart in 1930-something did this on a particular day, the chart is going to repeat itself 75 years later? I'm sure if I tried I could find past data similar to today's trends that show that the stock market is going to rally 50% in the next three years. The comparisons are meaningless. It's a different government, a different economy, and an entirely different century. Authors seem to dredge this junk up because it is easier then having to think for themselves.

As far as the comments about Obama...
"We can't blame President Obama for the mess he inherited. But we can definitely blame him for making it worse. Stocks are off 28.4% since his election, 15.2% since his inauguration, and 17.2% since his so-called 'stimulus' bill was enacted. To say the very least, whate...(Read more of this comment)
ejhickey

4 Comments
To wokthedog :

Are you saying that it would be a good thing if things got a lot worse than they are now because that would motivate people to "change"? Do you actually think that the decline in the stock market is a good thing? That is just wrong and contrary to what Obama has promised about things getting better.

You also state that when FDR came in the market had nowhere else to go but up. Not true . the Dow had been lower. there was every reason for the Dow to stay in the same range it had been in for about a year . Instead the Dow went higher right after the inauguration and kept going up the rest of the year.

The argument that the market has to go up because it can't go any lower is has been used time and time again to justify buying stocks . It was even used by Obama to justify if his half hearted Buy Stock recommendation last week before the market tanked again. this argument is only valid if the market is at Zero. However maybe that is the ...(Read more of this comment)
Advertisements
 
Retrieving data...