Monday March 22, 2010 12:00 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published November 27, 2009  |  A A A
Ahead of the Curve by Donald Luskin (Author Archive)

Bank Stocks' Recent Woes Could Be Contagious

A funny thing happened on the way to one of the greatest bull markets in history. The financial sector, whose miraculous recovery from near-death made it all possible, has lapsed into a coma.

At their highwater mark last week, stocks as measured by the S&P 500 were up 64.1% in 253 days, the best performance since 1933, only equaled two other times in the recorded history of U.S. stock prices. The financial sector has led the way, and has turned in an even more amazing performance. At the S&P 500 Financials sector's highwater mark, it was up 160% in just 222 days.

Now here's what worries me. For the last month, while stocks overall have moved on to new highs, the financial sector hasn't. In fact as of Nov. 24, it was off 6.7% from the highs it made in mid-October. Over the same period, stocks overall are up 1.2%.

The question is: from a technical standpoint, can stocks keep rising when the engine of growth that has powered this whole bull market has sputtered out? From a more fundamental standpoint, the question is: what's gone wrong in the financial sector, and does a problem here pose a threat to overall economic recovery?

The technical question can potentially be answered in an upbeat way. There's nothing wrong with a little sector rotation. In fact it's healthy to see different sectors take the lead at different points in a bull market. It's like a relay race in which one runner rests after passing the baton to the next runner.

The problem here is that this runner isn't just resting, he's moving backward. Financials have actually lost value since passing the baton a month ago.

How about the runner to whom the baton was passed? In some sense the baton was passed to all the other runners at once. There's no other sector that's down since the top for financials a month ago.

The three other sectors that have done the best since then -- doing about as well as financials did badly -- are telecommunications services, up 6.4%, health care, up 5.8%, and consumer staples, up 4.2%.

Bull markets are sustained by moves in sectors that have a compelling story behind then, a story that captures the imagination of investors and keeps them buying. Of the three that have done the best in the last month, only health care has a good story.

In my judgment, what's driving it is the increasing probability that the government takeover of health care now being rammed through Congress is going to not happen, or at least not happen much. I know it looks like an unstoppable freight train, with the congressional leadership using every trick in the book to get it done by hook or by crook. But I think the reality is that the legislative progress that's been made so far has only been by the narrowest of victories, and has been based on unsustainable compromises between interest groups. When it comes time for the full Congress to really vote on a single bill, I think the only way legislators will be able to agree on anything is by passing a watered-down bill that will have the effect of no bill at all. So health-care stocks are rallying on hopes that when all is said and done they can get back to business as usual.

1
2
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: amtsop
So far, don't see a major correction coming on a chart basis---may trade down somewhat over the next 4 weeks but wouldn't be surprised to see this thing then run to about April--the odds are the next area to rotate into are commodities and basic materials--- the banks will continue to suck wind and will for some time--reminds me of the 70s when commodities and hard assets did well and financials lagged---one poster mentioned deflation but so far it isn't present--you have deleveraging and deflation of housing along with the stock market so you have some asset deflation, however general price deflation isn't present--as long as the dollar is being debased you shouldn't see a general deflationary environment.
vernhuffer

91 Comments
The lesson of 2008 should never be forgotten. After the repeal of Glass-Steagle banks took risks that produced large profits for a few quarters but when the fall happened there was nothing for the feds to do but drop a trillion into the pot. Now the bankers want to do it again. The American public has been puting up with an awful lot but their tolerance is not unlimited.
tradingstocks

22 Comments
Deflationary crash continues. This is worse than Great Depression. Total debt is too high. Debt must increase exponentially to increase GDP linearly. If Debt does not inflate, GDP does not increase. Government is wasting money. Debt has started to deflate. It has been inflated non-stop for 50 years. It is going to take time to deflate. Debt is our money supply. We printed 2 trillion dollars, and we borrowed 50 to 300 trillion. How do you think this will be paid back if more borrowing does not occur? They say US dollar is dead. It is worthless. If so, why can't Dubai find few worthless dollars and pay off debt? Why can't home owners find few dollars to pay off mortgage? This is text book deflationary crash and it is going to go into history books: http://www.tradingstocks.net/html/latest_opinion.html
Posted by: thomas-ott@gmx.net
THE NEW PRIVILEGED CLASS

Never in the history of mankind has a social group been granted the status of a priviledged class with UNLIMITED amounts of money at no interest at the expense of the tax payer. Never in the history of the United States has a social group been granted the RESULT of 'profit' without that group 'making' it. Yet, this is what the new priviledged class 'banking sector' is about: they are 'supposed' to make a profit, no matter what they do, and if they don't do the right things, there is always the Government, which finally grants them the result of 'profit'. The banking sector is supposed to make a profit in any case, whereas noone else is supposed to make a profit,
somehow, 'banking sectior' is 'essential' whereas the rest of us are disposable scum who are slaving for this priviledged class. Banking sector is 'the driving motor', yes, thanks, I saw THAT when everything collapsed.

No, I DID NOT AND DO NOT FAVOUR A GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER OF THE B...(Read more of this comment)
Advertisements
 
Retrieving data...