Sunday November 22, 2009 1:03 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published July 30, 2009  |  A A A
Tradecraft by Jonathan Hoenig (Author Archive)

Health Care's Real Problem Isn't About Capitalism

Profit Can Heal Health Care

In his June 6 radio address, the president highlighted “unwarranted profiteering” as one of the root causes of skyrocketing health-care costs.

Later that month, he suggested “a public option” where “we set up an insurer that isn’t profit-driven, that can keep administrative costs low” as one alternative.

Laced throughout the discussion on health-care reform is the oft-repeated belief that profits undermine care. In his news conference, the president went so far as to suggest that “[if] your child has a bad sore throat or has repeated sore throats, the doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, you know what, I make a lot more money if I take this kid's tonsils out.” The implication: Doctors are unethical shysters who’d do anything to make a buck, even performing unnecessary procedures.

Truth be told, the problems with American health care stem not from it being for-profit and capitalist, but from it not being capitalist enough.

As we first wrote more than two years back, health-care system in the U.S. is far from a free market. Between Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and a myriad of other public programs, it's estimated that the government already pays for nearly half the health care in this country as it is.

The insurance companies now scorned as pariahs are far from free market participants. Rather, they’re highly regulated as to the type of coverage they offer, who is eligible, what plans must cover and how services are paid. Bureaucrats control virtually all aspects of health care, including hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and doctors themselves, determining who can prescribe medicine, how much they can charge and how livers get allocated.

If your goal is improving health care, we should want as many profit-hungry companies as possible getting into the field. Profitable companies succeed not by fleecing or exploiting their customers, but by providing an actual value and service over time. Without hesitation, we understand how Toyota (TM), FedEx (FDX), Wal-Mart (WMT), Apple (AAPL) and Southwest (LUV), have each succeeded in improving quality and reducing cost within their field…while also looking to profit. Same goes for the companies we wrote about this spring, each aiming to grow their business by improving service and lowering price, even during a recession. That’s exactly what a free market does.

Health care is a commodity like any other. The same sort of competition to improve and expand service could be achieved within health care, but only to the extent government permits a free market to function.

The suggestion that somehow increasing regulation and decreasing the profit incentive will improve health care has not been born out anywhere in history. For example, since Congress deregulated domestic air travel in 1978, the cost of a ticket has risen some 63%. First-class postage has risen some 180% over the same period and college tuition at a public university has climbed 857%.

American health care doesn’t need to be fixed — it needs to be set free. That notion, unfortunately, isn’t on the table at all.

A Middle Eastern Wonder

Those interested in emerging markets should note that one of the best performers over the past 52 weeks hasn’t been Russia, Brazil, India, or any of the other countries beloved by the herd, but tiny and often overlooked Israel. Near break-even over the past year (Many Russian stock funds are still down some 50%), strong regional companies include Teva Pharmaceuticals (TEVA), Check Point Software (CHKP) and supermarket operator Blue Square Israel (BSI), in which my fund holds a stake. IShares Israel (EIS) is the broad-based ETF that tracks the country’s market names.

A Profitable Pilgrimage

iShares Israel (EIS) vs. Powershares India (PIN), Ishares Brazil (EWZ) and iShares China (FXI)

At the time of writing, Hoenig’s fund held positions in both Toyota (TM) and Blue Square Israel (BSI).

Jonathan Hoenig is managing member at Capitalistpig Hedge Fund LLC.


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: pcantidote
iamnotkosh:

No, YOU are missing the point. Go back and read Jonathan's article. When you say things like... "a) buy insurance at an ever increasing price b) face potentially ruinous costs without it c) do without vital medical care"....it tells me that you are using our present system as your basis for these comments.

You, Jonathan, and I all agree that the present system does not work. Why not give a true free market approach a chance. Why does everything always have to be about big government programs even though we know such programs have never worked? The health care system is not functioning like a free market because of all of the big government intervention and contagion already in the system. The answer is remove government and employers totally, and leave the market to insurers, individuals and doctors. This did work for more than a hundred years in this country until big government swooped in and intervened.

It is simple, really. You pay for...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: rgreeniwa
Iamnotkosh-- well- written reply. The only reason I can think of that this provokes such a visceral reaction in people is fear of the unknown. however, if more would spend a little time in other industrialized nations they would see that the fear is seriously misplaced. The general level of health care is much higher in many of these nations than here and is far less catastrophic on the individual.

But because most have not seen this first hand we are prey to the fear mongerers like in this article.
Posted by: iamnotkosh
pcantidote:

You are missing the point. The choices are stark: a) buy insurance at an ever increasing price b) face potentially ruinous costs without it c) do without vital medical care.

Like other basic survival necessities (food, shelter, clothing, water), nobody reasonably chooses "c". The people choosing "b" are judgment proof - or will be, so ever more costs fall to "a".

Unlike other survival necessities, actual health care costs can vary 100x (or more) between consumers making the same healthy (or unhealthy) choices.

To argue that health care is like food or like airline tickets is a silly over simplification. Even a cursory look into the real issues shows all kinds of weird behaviors that are not functioning like a normal market. Go look at what happens to utilization numbers when hospital beds are added in a region. They don't react with normal supply demand curves.

The system is seriously fouled up. It consumes a huge percent...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: pcantidote
kosh and grizz - Couldn't you survey the free market and make choices about your doctors and your insurance coverages BEFORE your life threatening illness? You act as if you have to figure out all of your car insurance coverages and providers in the split second between realizing you are about to crash and impact. Drama queens.
Posted by: rgreeniwa
"since Congress deregulated domestic air travel in 1978, the cost of a ticket has risen some 63%. "

Yes, and we've benefited enormously from better service in the air, haven't we? Using this model, we'll be like India, where you have to have someone on the outside, a friend or relative, bring you food in the hospital, and buy your drugs from an outside pharmacy.

Why do we keep having these discussions? We're one of the only industrialized nations who doesn't have some form of nationalized health care for the average citizen. Yet our life expectancy and infant mortality is significantly worse than most of those countries with national health care.
Advertisements

Related Quotes

TM 76.97 Down -0.54 -0.70%
FDX 81.78 Down -0.70 -0.85%
WMT 54.28 Down -0.26 -0.48%
AAPL 199.92 Down -0.59 -0.29%

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.