Thursday March 18, 2010 10:00 PM ET
SmartMoney
Want more tax-saving advice before you file? Download our free Tax Guide here.
Published October 27, 2009  |  A A A
Tax Tips by Aleksandra Todorova (Author Archive)

Is the New IRS Wealth Squad Coming for You?

Being wealthy has its downsides, chief among them the higher risk of an IRS audit.

Now, amid the continuing debate over whether the government is doing enough to combat financial fraud, comes news that gives the uber-wealthy – or maybe even the “merely” wealthy – yet another reason to fear Uncle Sam’s attention.

In a speech before the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, or AICPA, IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman announced the recent formation of a new unit, dubbed Global High Wealth Industry Group, which will focus on the nation’s wealthiest individuals and their entities.

The group’s work will go way beyond screening tax returns and your garden-variety audit. “We will take a unified look at the entire web of business entities controlled by a high-wealth individual, which will enable us to better assess the risk such arrangements pose to tax compliance and the integrity of our tax system,” Shulman said in his speech.

That, says Lisa Feathernhill, a CPA and director of estate and financial planning at Wells Fargo’s Family Wealth Group, is very broad and very deep. “They’re trying to understand how very wealthy people have their finances structured,” she says. “When I read that, it gave me pause.”

The IRS has already begun hiring agents and specialists for this “wealth squad,” including flow-through specialists and international examiners, and plans to add more staff, including economists, appraisal experts and technical advisors in the near future.

How will these specialists decide who to put under the microscope? Several broad clues can be gleaned from Shulman’s speech. SmartMoney.com spoke with wealth managers and CPAs who work with high-net-worth individuals for more specifics. Here are some criteria that are likely to be considered a red flag:

1. Income or assets over $10 million

Shulman pointed out that “at least initially, [the IRS] will be looking at individuals with tens of millions of dollars of assets or income.” Granted, the number of people who earn tens of millions a year may appear infinitely small: In 2007, the IRS received 18,394 tax returns reporting adjusted gross income (AGI) of $10 million or more, less than 0.05% of total tax returns received. It is often limited to celebrities and top-level executives. But certain events, like receiving a particularly juicy bonus or retirement package, could well throw you into that group. “Retiring executives who might have distributions from several plans would have very large income tax returns for at least the first year or two after retirement,” says Featherngill.

Throwing asset size into the mix expands the target group considerably. “It could be anybody: real estate owners, closely-held business owners, [those with significant] investment assets,” Featherngill says.

2. Complex financial arrangements

Here’s what Shulman had to say of the types of assets that may attract attention: “They may include trusts, real estate investments, royalty and licensing agreements, revenue-based or equity-sharing arrangements, private foundations, privately-held companies, and partnerships and other flow-through entities that require looking at the entire, and often huge, spectrum of transactions and entities. A single high-wealth individual may have actual or beneficial ownership of numerous related entities, sometimes alone and sometimes along with other family members or business associates.”

Sounds like an all-inclusive resort, right? Harry Abrahamsen, principal of Abrahamsen Financial Group, a wealth management group in Holmdell, N.J., says individuals who have investments in hedge funds that are set up, or raise money, offshore are particularly at risk. “This is probably a direct offshoot of the UBS [tax shelter probe] and people setting up offshore accounts,” he says.

3. Offshore income or tax residency

Other tax considerations include “international sourcing of income and tax residency, and offshore structures and bank accounts,” Shulman said. You’re more at risk if you have substantial wealth; dual citizenship and assets in another country; are a legal resident alien (i.e., you do not have U.S. citizenship, but are working or living in the U.S. temporarily); or simply have assets outside of the U.S., Abrahamsen says.

4. Movie and rock stars, athletes, expats

What do all these professions have in common? They are much more likely to hear from the new IRS unit, says Abrahamsen. The size of their paychecks aside, entertainers and athletes tend to bring in a lot of their income from performing overseas. So do expatriates – including U.S. citizens on temporary assignments in foreign countries.

The IRS won’t likely overlook successful business owners, either: The holistic approach of this new type of audit could mean that once you’re on the IRS’s radar, your company’s balance sheet may wind up audited along with your own tax returns, says Featherngill.


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: DebtGazette
The IRS has now noticed that there is probably a whole lot of money being left out on the table out there that they could claim. It always seemed odd to me that the people that had the most ability to pay the IRS, were at the same time almost treated the most leniently.

I do feel that the impression is there that the super rich fill their tax returns with write offs and tax breaks and don't really pay what they should. Now granted, I don't know what the exact numbers are, but I do know what public perception is. Public perception certainly is that the super wealthy don't pay the same percentage of their income back in taxes. It might have to do with the fact that they can hire the best accountants, but that certainly doesn't make it right.

I have to applaud the IRS for this new enforcement unit, and hope that its actions go in line with the lofty goals that it has set. There really is no way that our government should be forced to cut spending on worthwhile efforts an...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: bluedag
Sounds good to me. If you're not cheating, you've got nothing to worry about.
Advertisements
 
Retrieving data...