Saturday March 20, 2010 11:02 PM ET
SmartMoney
Want more tax-saving advice before you file? Download our free Tax Guide here.
Published April 1, 2009  |  A A A
The Tax Guy by Bill Bischoff (Author Archive)

The President's Budget Could Hurt Your Tax Bill

Not surprisingly, Barack Obama’s tax policy objectives have been a moving target. During the campaign we heard one thing. Let's call it version 1.0. Of course, campaign promises were tempered by reality soon after the election was over. The dire state of the economy dictated that the newly-elected president's planned tax increases for individuals could not be implemented immediately.

In fact, the multitude of tax changes in the Obama-sponsored American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (better known as the Stimulus Bill), unveiled in February, were almost all pro-taxpayer. That was version 2.0, and many taxpayers breathed a sigh of relief.

But those taxpayers shouldn't get too comfortable, because the target is still moving. The administration’s proposed budget for the 2010 fiscal year reveals some of the president’s longer-term tax policy goals. I refer to this as version 3.0 -- and some of you may not like it.

Here’s a breakdown of the tax changes proposed in Obama's budget that would have the most impact on you.

Reinstate Higher Tax Rates for Higher-Income Individuals

As promised (maybe threatened is a better word) during the campaign, the Obama budget calls for unwinding the Bush tax cuts for individuals in the top two brackets, starting in 2011. The current 33% and 35% federal income tax rates would be replaced with the pre-Bush administration rates of 36% and 39.6%, respectively. This change would affect married joint-filing couples with incomes above $250,000 and unmarried individuals with incomes above $200,000. The rate hike is projected to raise about $340 billion in tax revenue between 2011 and 2019.

Reinstate Deduction Phase-Out Rules for Higher-Income Individuals

Obama also wants to restore two dreaded phase-out rules that can wipe out: (1) part or all of a higher-income individual’s personal exemption deductions and (2) up to 80% of the most common types of itemized deductions. These changes were also proposed during the campaign and would take effect in 2011. Married joint-filing couples with incomes above $250,000 and unmarried individuals with incomes above $200,000 would be impacted. The restored phase-out rules are expected to raise about $180 billion in 2011-19.

Reduce Tax Savings from Higher-Income Individuals’ Itemized Deductions

Starting in 2011, the Obama budget includes a change that would effectively allow only a 28% tax benefit for itemized deductions claimed by individuals who are in the new 36% and 39.6% tax brackets. As a result, itemized deductions for these folks could first be cut back by the phase-out rule explained above. Then whatever deductions are left would deliver only a reduced tax-saving benefit of 28% instead of the expected 36% or 39.6%. This change is projected to raise about $320 billion between 2011 and 2019.

Increase Maximum Tax Rates on Capital Gains and Dividends

The Obama budget proposed to leave the current taxpayer-friendly federal income rate on long-term capital gains and dividends in place for all taxpayers except those in the highest two tax brackets. For those unlucky folks, the maximum rate would go up to 20%, from the current 15%. This change would take effect in 2011. The rate hike is projected to raise about $120 billion between 2011 and 2019.

Alternative Minimum Tax

Obama's budget requests the continuation of the current policy, which calls for increases in the alternative minimum tax (AMT) exemption amounts each year to account for inflation.

Estate Tax

The budget calls for the continuation of the current federal estate tax exemption amount of $3.5 million per person and the current maximum estate tax rate of 45%.

Refundable Credits

Under current rules, you can use most personal federal income tax credits (such as the higher education credits and the dependent care credit) to offset up to 100% of your federal income tax bill. But the credits end there. In contrast, so-called “refundable” credits are called that because the government pays them out in cash to eligible individuals after their tax bills (if any) have been reduced to zero. In other words, any refundable credits left over after your tax bill has been completely wiped out are sent to you in cash. To the extent this happens, refundable credit payments are basically disguised welfare. The Obama budget includes the following proposals for refundable personal credits.

Making Work Pay Credit: The current refundable credit of up to $400 for working singles and $800 for couples would be continued, which would cost the Treasury about $540 billion between 2011 and 2019.

Child Credit: Current liberalizations of the child credit, which make it a wholly- or partially-refundable credit for more taxpayers, would be continued at an estimated cost of about $70 billion for the years 2011 to 2019.

American Opportunity Credit: The current partially-refundable credit of up to $2,500 to cover tuition and course material costs during the first four years of college would be continued, which would cost about $75 billion for the years 2011 to 2019.

Earned Income Credit: The Obama budget calls for providing increased credits to qualifying married couples and families with three or more children. Doing so would cost the Treasury about $30 billion between 2011 and 2019. 

The Bottom Line

Add all these things up, and they amount to about $1.6 trillion worth of tax changes for 2011 through 2019. So it's important for taxpayers to be informed and equally important to let your congresspersons and senators know how you feel about the proposals. 


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Thenotsorich

3 Comments
It was BUSH era legislation that gave the middle class a break, the only way he could get it through a DEMOCRATIC majority was if it was "limited" in years of effect. Good golly, please EDUCATE yourself, as this mentality is what has allowed this "bipartisian, but mostly democratic congress" to set us ALL, yes some of you too, up for the biggest "scam" and money and home and bank and land grab in history perpetrated by the GREED and imbalance of power tripping pork feeding Washingtontonian "elite".
We are approaching "civil war" era politics, and I contend ALL of the American (make that legal citizens) will pay the price for this new social engineering from the majority of washington. The two parties are mostly the same agenda, with few exceptions........fill their pockets with our money. Then take more. We ALL need to wake up and stop "red herring" blaming each other............while we do that, as we speak, America is being stolen, funded with stolen money, sold to the highes...(Read more of this comment)
Thenotsorich

3 Comments
Apparrently you do not even read or watch the news, in this country being an "A" lister or Washington insider.......and NOT paying your taxes allows you to "run for office". At least 4 to 5 major nominees for King O's office, had HUGE tax bills (well not so huge considering their Pork gains) they "forgot" to pay, How more upside down can it be?

This is not the America our forefathers or my husband fought, and some died for.

How can you be so dumb, to STILL think it is the upper 5 or ten percent, those don't even bother to pay, because they KNow THEY ARE PROTECTED,BY THEIR "BUDDIES" IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

This is a national scandal, so much for "leadership" they certainly aren't even following the "law" but can shamelessly run for office and STEAL the money of the working class, elderly and the future children of this country, and NOT pay their "fair share", but tell the "victims" to cough up.

Total ignorance on the part of the "masses" to be lul...(Read more of this comment)
Thenotsorich

3 Comments
First, any deregulation could not occur without Congressional bills, and votes, many who where Demacratic majorities, or at the least bipartisian "screw" jobs on the American public.
How ignorant to only lay blame with the president who is really mostly a "salesman" to what Congress does. Presidents have "limited" power without Congress. Running for pres. cost MONEY, and they get it from the lobbist who also, for the most part, get it from US, by rip off "legislation". Wake up

Second, are we in Nazi Germany, where you point the finger at your fellow man to save your own hide,make that money?

Third, how DARE you say, "They can afford it".

You have NO idea just who is being hurt by this nonsense and doing away with all the deductions.
It is not the "rich" they got bailouts, and pork.

It is the middle class working, and the elderly rretired, who have worked a life time to "save" for their old age needs, and enjoyment. Now WE have to...(Read more of this comment)
USGNRL

48 Comments
Higher taxes - NO PROBLEM!

Pretend you have NO INTEGRITY, NO ETHICS, NO CONSCIENCE and NO BRAINS and are a loony-left liberal d-crat (i.e., a TAX CHEAT) and then you, too, can "geithner" your taxes and won't have to pay a penny for any of the d-crat waste of taxpayer money.
drsitek

2 Comments
I hardly believe that it will be that bad. After almost 28 years of deregulation, starting with Reagan, the US is now paying the price. What took that long to exacerbate the problem could take a long time to fix not withstanding the cost. Tax cuts for the wealthy, which Reagan tried and both Bush's also tried, do not work. They never will. Thsy only result in huge deficits. The Clinton tax plan did result in a surplus. I rest my case.
Advertisements
 
Retrieving data...