Thursday March 18, 2010 5:59 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published August 29, 2008  |  A A A
SmartMoney Magazine by Anne Kadet (Author Archive)

Why Stores Check Receipts 10 Feet From the Register

EARLIER THIS YEAR, a middle-aged certified public accountant living in small-town Washington state was convicted of misdemeanor assault after a three-day trial that had the whole community talking. His crime? Shoving a 75-year-old Wal-Mart greeter who wouldn't let him leave without showing a receipt. "He didn't have the right to make me do that," he told the local paper.

It's best to avoid assaulting the elderly, but I can almost sympathize with the CPA. Used to be, only club stores with membership rules checked your receipt and searched your bags at the exit. Now stores like Best Buy, Wal-Mart and Home Depot are doing it, and a trip to the store has taken on all the charm of a jaunt through airport security. Not surprisingly, shoppers are starting to challenge the presumption that we're all suspects who must prove our innocence before exiting the store.

Sanford, Maine, Web designer Rob Page-Auger has been snubbing the receipt checker for years, but it wasn't until he saw another customer endure a humiliatingly thorough search that he launched StandUpToWalMart.com, an online petition urging Wal-Mart to banish receipt checks. "You shouldn't be required to sacrifice your dignity to get a better deal," he says. So far the site has attracted more than 130,000 visitors.

Others protest by making a game of what they see as a farcical proceeding. John DeArmond, a nuclear engineer turned trucker turned retired Tennessee mountain man, insists that the checker compare every single item in his grocery cart against the receipt. (He's got a lot of free time.) Once, as a sort of grand finale, he marched his cart back to the service counter and returned the entire load.

Perhaps the most high-profile resister is Michael Righi, a software consultant who was detained by a Circuit City store manager in Brooklyn, Ohio, for refusing to show his receipt. When Righi called the police, they arrested him. The town later dropped charges, but the case created an online stir, prompting more than 200 supporters to contribute $5,300 to a legal-defense fund.

Not everyone came to Righi's defense. Hundreds wrote angry messages, calling him a "pretentious lunatic" and a "grade-A moron" for making such a big stink. "Please, for God's sake, don't start thinking you're some Rosa Parks," sneered one critic. Indeed, plenty of consumers say they don't mind the check if it thwarts shoplifters and lowers prices. I recently watched in astonishment as one Kmart shopper after another insisted that a lax security guard check their receipt.

Stores say the checkpoints are needed to thwart a growing problem: sophisticated crime rings that create distractions and move big loads of merchandise right out the front door. Mark Doyle, president of security consulting firm Jack L. Hayes International, says brazen thieves will wheel out dollies loaded with appliances, cases of liquor or, in one recent instance, an entire sectional sofa. The receipt checkers aren't there to catch individual shoplifters; they're posted as a deterrent. "You'd be stupid to try to walk something by them," he says.

For more SmartMoney Magazine features, turn to the September issue.

I'm glad stores are shutting down crooks, but that doesn't mean they get to stop me. Turns out, a store can't legally detain you for refusing a receipt check. Don't want to create a scene? Don't pause or make eye contact; just say, "no, thanks," and keep walking. It works. Home Depot's oversize security guard checked every shopper but didn't blink when I whizzed past, lugging a 4-foot piece of sheet metal. The checker at Guitar Center loudly demanded my receipt, but I kept going, and the heavy-metal goon squad never appeared.

To be honest, I expected more of a reaction. Maybe I should have tried the tactics of the online wag who wisely identifies himself only as MR. His strategy: Make eye contact with the checker, then slowly stuff the receipt down the front of his pants. "The look of horror is priceless."


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: NCWV85
First of all, all of you legal geniuses should know that while stores do have the right to prosecute shoplifters, they ABSOLUTELY do NOT have any right to detain one for not showing one's receipt. And to all you who can't understand why people object to this, you should read Kano1's earlier post.

As for me, if they refuse to 'let' me leave without a receipt check, I will return my merchandise and shop somewhere else.
Posted by: A0110915r
I don't like the receipt check, mainly because it sometimes means standing in another line. But I think it should be perfectly OK for the store to do this. I don't like shoplifting and would be happy to give up a little of my time to thwart it because I know, in the end, shoplifting costs ME money in higher prices. Moreover, a society that facilitates shoplifting is a society headed for trouble. What irritates me is people who brazenly refuse to have their receipts checked, who complain about security checks at airports, and who behave as though they are above the law. Maybe they are within their legal rights, but they are showing the crooks how to get away with stealing and I don't buy the argument that 'it violates my rights' to have someone check me out. I may be in the minority on this subject, but I don't go around violating the law and using my 'civil rights' as a way to avoid detection and prosecution. It is one thing to 'presume innocent' when trying someone for a crime. It is ...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: MoneyHugger
I don't shoplift and just ignoring the receipt police usually works well for me (and, just saying 'no thanks, have a nice day' while ignoring all responses from the receipt checker works the remainder of the time). Certainly if I _were_ shoplifting or engaged in a fraudulent scheme, I would bypass the receipt police just as I do today -- which makes me wonder what good the checking does. Do the checkers ever actually catch any fraudulent behavior?
Posted by: ExClepto
Wow, the checkers are just a security blanket. They're there to make everyone feel better. I was a very sucessful shoplifter for the better part of a decade (i've since 'retired', you never think you'll get caught when you're young) and not only were they not a problem, as you all have pointed out, if you just keep walking, they just leave you alone. They may deter someone trying to haul out a tv, or any other version of major larceny, but they'll never even notice the thousands of pocketable item walking out the door. Any loss prevention agent will tell you, the vast majority of loss is the death by a thousand cuts, lots of small losses. Not a lot of tvs walk out, but you should see the cds run.
Posted by: bri007
In response to Mikey193 ... people do steal things WITH a receipt. It happens every day. They are very complex schemes that often involve the cashier. They ring up enough product at the register (often inexpensive items) to drop people's suspicions and then walk out the door with thousands of dollars worth of free product that never made it past the scanner. These reciept checkers often look for the expensive product in your cart to make sure it was rung properly. If you want to avoide this minor intrusion, be prepared for much higher prices next time you want to make your purchase more conveniently.
Advertisements
 
Retrieving data...

Related Quotes

WMT 55.94 Up 0.02 0.04%