Monday November 23, 2009 10:54 AM ET
SmartMoney
Comments

Story Comments

RSS RSS | Join the SmartMoney Twitter Community
New Math for IRA Savings
The little-used Roth IRA could be the best option for many people approaching retirement.
 
You must be registered to use comments. Please login
User Comments
Posted by: sobrien128
Jim Blankenship is correct. His is a much better analysis than the author of the article did.

S. OBrien, CPA
Posted by: Mirandaortiz
This is a good introduction to Roth IRA, but I'd also recommend looking at
http://www.rothirarules.net/roth-ira-eligibility.htm . They have some in-depth analysis of Roth IRA investments, basic do's and don'ts and so on.
Posted by: jowen2
Married filing separately can do conversion to Roth beginning 2010.
BlankenshipFP SmartMoney Insiders
2 Comments
While I share Mr. Keating's enthusiasm over the Roth IRA and the benefits of investing therein, there is a slight oversight in his "math" as reported:

It was mentioned that in order to achieve the same benefit with a traditional IRA as a $5,000 contribution in a Roth IRA, the taxpayer would need to invest a total of $6,944, assuming a 28% tax bracket. What isn't pointed out is that, given the 28% tax bracket, in order to make the $5,000 contribution to a Roth IRA, the individual must earn $6,944 in order to have a net $5,000 available for his Roth IRA contribution.

Effectively, if tax rates remain the same and the differential is always invested, the Roth IRA and the traditional IRA are roughly equivalent. But tax rates are bound to be on the rise - making the Roth IRA more attractive. Adding in the "no RMD" factor is just icing on the cake.

Jim Blankenship, CFP®, EA
Advertisements