With plenty of boomers seeking more advice as they careen toward retirement, full-service brokerage firms are attracting new money from investors at a brisk pace, and many brokers now label themselves "financial advisors." Still, one important difference separates brokers from many of their competitors: Registered investment advisors and some financial planners are required to be fiduciaries — that is, to act in their clients' best financial interest. But brokers have no such duty. Because of that distinction, some consumer advocates argue that brokers shouldn't be allowed to offer broader financial-planning services. Indeed, an SEC rule issued in 2005 — known as Rule 202 — requires brokers to let clients know that they aren't fiduciaries. It also says that in most cases, brokers can't sell soup-to-nuts financial plans or present themselves to clients as "financial planners."
Where does that leave investors, besides confused? To find out, SmartMoney conducted an informal survey. Our reporter introduced herself as a prospective client, visiting eight brokerages that were either within walking distance of our Manhattan office or a short drive from her New Jersey home. She presented herself as a divorcee who had received a legal settlement and needed advice about investing, tax and estate planning, college savings, retirement and insurance (all true, by the way). She left out only that she would be writing about the experience. Of course, our field test was hardly scientific. But we found out that in their new roles, many brokers seemed just as confused as their customers. The good news: We picked up a lot of attractive graphs and pie charts, and a couple weeks' worth of free coffee.
Some of the highlights:
When we tallied our results, one thing was clear: The advice we'd received had ranged all over the map. Smith Barney thought we should have 95% of our assets in equity-only mutual funds. Merrill Lynch advocated 56%. The annual fees ranged from 0.5% of our assets at Charles Schwab up to 2.25% at Morgan Stanley — and that doesn't include the sales loads on some of the products they recommended. Meanwhile, the best advice we got came from a broker who had the added training of a registered investment advisor — and also happened to be a total jerk. One thing's certain: Given the current state of affairs, consumers will continue to have a hard time figuring out who's qualified to help.
Picking an Advisor |
THE "FINANCIAL ADVISOR" label fits an army of experts with a bewildering range of titles. But whether you're considering hiring a big brokerage or a neighbor who works out of her garage, some of the same tips apply. Below, a newcomer's guide.
Know What You Want Find Out How They're Paid Be the CSI Customer Call Them to Account Look for a Good Fit |
(Additional reporting by Megan Barnett)
| For a more complete version of this article, pick up SmartMoney magazine at your local newsstand. |
I've been working in this industry for many years,researched the business models for the different financial services companies and I feel this article is nothing but dribble and rubbish.I believe they are on the right track regarding this project to learn about the investment advice given but have tons more work to do before they can claim which firms know about financial planning components and advice.
Mick T., CFP, CFA, MBA
Thank God Smart Money has fired the first shot in bringing the financial services industry to task. Now if we just get them to shine the light on the conglomerates' practices of setting sales quotas of PROPRIETARY products in order for their reps to get benefits, like health insurance. The points in the side bar about vetting a financial advisor are great. Everyone should do their homework!
-Scott B. CFP
I've been at it for going on 19 years with a CPA and CFP background. I've found highly qualified individuals every where I look in the industry. Likewise, I've found ego-driven commission maniacs every where I look. This is a people business and clients need to be careful with whom they entrust their assets. It does appear the fee-only model, though still a relatively small part of the over all market, is the most practical for higher net worth individuals.
Jeff S., CFP