Sunday November 22, 2009 6:08 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published August 19, 2008  |  A A A
Economy by Jack Hough (Author Archive)

China's Gold-Medal Growth Holds More Promise Than Threat

(Page all of 2)

Lately I'm intimidated by Chinese women. One is six-foot-three and punches volleyballs into the sand. Another, at 287 pounds, smashes opponents to the floor like sacks of laundry. The most fearsome weighs just 73 pounds and flutters around wooden bars with a child's grace (and, some accuse, a child's age). Each morning I check the Olympic gold medal standings and find that China is further ahead of America. The count is now 41 to 25. But for one remarkable Baltimore swimmer, China would be leading 41 to 17.

The standings only affirm what I've long read in the financial pages: China is trouncing my beloved America. China's economy has grown by an average of 10% since 2000, five times the U.S. rate. Its personal income has soared while ours has stagnated. Its surplus of goods sold to foreigners minus ones bought from them is the largest in the world. So is America's deficit of the same. Between 1990 and 2007 China's share of world manufacturing quadrupled. Its economy will match America's in size by 2035 and double it by midcentury, reckons Albert Keidel, a former top China advisor to the U.S. Treasury and World Bank, now a senior associate with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Other trends I read about seem more threatening. China's soaring demand for food makes U.S. grocery bills more expensive. Its fuel subsidies likewise bloat our gasoline bills. Its smog alters the world's climate. Its currency, kept artificially cheap by its government, allows Chinese manufacturers to undersell American ones. And China will surely spend its future wealth to build a massive military, which it will be tempted to put to mischief.

Worst of all is what China's growth says about the link between freedom and prosperity. One is supposed to beget the other, I'm told. Yet China is only 53% free, compared with 81% for America. This, according to the Index of Economic Freedom compiled by The Heritage Foundation, a right-leaning think tank, and by The Wall Street Journal. Scores are based on 10 "freedoms." China wins decisively on only one: small government. Its central planners spend just 18.5% of gross domestic product. America's central planners spend 36.6%. On taxes the two are roughly matched. The U.S. wins easily on most other freedoms. It allows businesses to start and operate with relative ease. It protects property rights. It is less corrupt.

So why does free America grow slower than not-nearly-as-free China? A nation's level of freedom predicts only its level of prosperity, not its growth in prosperity. America is properly richer, with $46,000 of GDP per head, compared with $5,500 for China, adjusted for local purchasing power. Growth in freedom, meanwhile, predicts growth in prosperity. China's freedom score of 53% is, in fact, a sizable and recent achievement. Just 30 years ago it would have scored near zero, according to the Heritage Foundation. Since the 1976 death of Mao Zedong, the architect of Chinese communism, China has phased out collectivized farming, freed prices, developed a stock market and gradually permitted foreign investment.

Those reforms have bought blazing growth. They might be nearly spent. The Economic Freedom index's authors calculate that a 10 percentage point increase in score corresponds with a doubling of income per head. Considering America's level, China's freedom score ought to afford it income of $6,600 per head. It is close to that now. Signs of a slowdown loom. American stocks are down 12% in value this year, but Chinese ones have fallen twice as much. The trade gap between the U.S. and China, while huge, is shrinking. For the 12 months ended in June America's exports grew 23% in dollar terms, vs. 17% for China, reports The Economist.

China's economy will surely top ours one day, but that will only make a good customer a better one. U.S. exports to China have risen fivefold in a decade. While America buys more than it sells, China specializes in low-margin fare like clothes, basic metals and household appliances, while the U.S. dominates in lucrative airplanes, drugs and high-tech equipment. China's cheap currency likely does more good than harm; it allows Apple (AAPL) and others to buy innards cheap and sell finished gadgets dear.

Don't blame China too much for high grocery bills. It is a small but growing net exporter of grain. Do blame China, and thank it in earnest, for fuel inflation. Americans are driving less for the first time in 30 years. Wind and solar farms are sprouting. The electric car, killed in the 1920s by abundant gasoline cans and scarce electrical outlets, will make a long overdue return starting in two years. Press China on pollution, but note that particles suspended in Beijing's air are less dense than they were in Tokyo in the mid-1970s and Seoul in the mid-1990s.

As for China's military menace and its remaining deficit of personal freedom, the relationship between prosperity and freedom bodes well for both. Having nearly cashed in on its reforms to date, China must further forsake Mao for Milton Friedman, or else stall. It will thus one day be a freer superpower or none at all.

Its rise might even spur American accomplishment. I'll count the gold for the London Games in 2012, but for now we can bolster our lead in freedom. Ten more percentage points on the index will propel us past Hong Kong, Singapore, Ireland and Australia for first place, and buy us higher incomes. It will require a sharp drop in government spending along with a smaller, simpler tax. (I have some thoughts on that.) If we must spend, let's buy better stuff. Here's to cheaper doctor visits and college degrees, better roads and a new electric grid, and to less war, less favoritism for corn growers and the sun-setting of perverse incentives for borrowing big to buy houses.

By the way, we'll just have to get used to towering Chinese volleyballers. New York-based Alvalon, a size and fit consultant for the fashion industry, says Chinese children have grown an inch and a half in 10 years, double the increase for American children. The average Chinese female now stands eye-to-eye with her American counterpart at five-foot-four, while American men at five-foot-nine have the Chinese by just an inch. That is surely a result of improved nutrition in China. Two decades ago some 70% of its population lived on less than a dollar a day. Now fewer than 15% do — a victory for those who root for the human condition as fervently as they do Olympic gold.


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: joestephany

This article is pure bunk. The Heritage Foundation is a propaganda organization founded by a Pittsburgh billionare for the sole purpose of increasing the wealth going to the rich. I would not believe a word of what they say.

Mankinds success is based on the cooperation, not competition between people. They have to trust and value each other. This is the source of human wealth, there is no other. China has shown the capacity to exploit people, not get cooperation. It will fail as many other third world countries where greed, not cooperation, is king. It is greed that keeps the poor countries poor.

The model of cooperation are the European countries, where the govenments purpose is to make sure the everyone gets a fair shake. In Europe everyone has medical insurance, retirement benefits, and reasonably fair wages.

The conservatives have placed us on a path that will lead us to a two class country with everything owned by a very few and every body e...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: brianallen
singlemalt's commentary has a certain ... um ... well ... um Single Malt quality about it!

Well said, Sir.

Hear! Hear! :.
Posted by: singlemalt
Surely the author of this article can't be deluding himself that a militarily and economically powerful fascist regime can be a good thing for the U.S., or the West in general? First of all, China is not communist. Not any longer. In spite of supposedly smaller government than the U.S., which is the basis of this foolish author's 'thesis', (and I use that term loosely) all real industry is still underwritten and commanded by China's military leaders, working behind the scenes, not the politicos. The military profits from industrial expansion, and uses that economic leverage to consolidate its own power. Economic power means further entrenchment of the existing system. How? Very simple. As long as Chinese citizens have increasing access to shiny consumer goods and affordable food, the real power in China knows that calls for political reform will be pretty much non-existent. One only has to look at the reaction of the Chinese public to Western efforts to promote human rights. There is a...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: brianallen
sm815 is spot on.

First of all there is no more escaping that around a billion of those poor serfs the Peking predators like you to call 'Chinese' are living in the kind of grinding poverty that 95-odd percent of Americans cannot even begin to imagine. And then there's that 40% of the much-vaunted 'Chinese economy' is based in intellectual theft, in fraud and in counterfeiting.

Then there is the self-appointed and self-perpetuating Peking gang's corrupt overstatement of 'growth,' which, when coupled with that gruesome gang's own and with every other Chinese opportunist's systemic looting of 'china's' banks (more than 50% of whose loans are 'non-performing' -- and of its every other institution -- it is a foregone conclusion that we shall soon see the whole house of cards come tumbling down.

And even if 'china's' coming crash was not the lay-down-misère certainty that, as sm815 has stated, it is, the world's economy is not a zero-sum game.

Every e...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: sm815
Within 2, maybe 3 years, China will be in one of the biggest recessions, if not depressions, the world has ever seen. It's a house of cards. And economic pyramid scheme.
Advertisements

Related Quotes

AAPL 199.92 Down -0.59 -0.29%