Sunday November 8, 2009 2:07 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published May 9, 2008  |  A A A
Economy by Igor Greenwald (Author Archive)

D.C. Energy Talk Is Mostly Hot Air

FOUR BUCKS A gallon is just plain un-American. We pioneered the spare family car and the SUV. Driving is our manifest destiny, and we do more of it than anyone else. Gas should be cheaper — just ask any politician holding a press conference at a gas station. And it will be, just as soon as their energy program is adopted, by executive decree.

I'm here to pop that bubble, and I don't mean the energy bubble. I haven't seen one of those yet. When demand for a commodity rises steadily along with the price while the supply remains the same year after year, that's not a bubble — that's a market signal. And when many of the suppliers of that same scarce commodity sell for 10 times earnings, that's got to be the cheapest bubble in history.

A reader recently questioned my forecasting credentials after I admitted to owning just one car for an entire nuclear family. We've since acquired a second set of wheels, attached to a tiny used hybrid. I believe I'm now fully qualified to advise against holding one's breath for the gas-tax holiday, the windfall profit tax or the long threatened downfall of Exxon Mobil (XOM). Though it beats hyperventilating at the pump.

The energy spike isn't like the dot-com bubble; it's not going to dissipate in a couple of years, leaving nothing but ruined portfolios in its wake. Energy is among the world's most widely traded resources and demand for it is rising mostly in faraway places where the retail price of fuel is fixed. That means energy prices and demand interact with considerable lags. And the effect of the recent price increases has been countered by rapid income growth in the developing world. Those upwardly mobile consumers aren't getting back on the bus.

Recent academic work that's looked at the historical relationship between income and car ownership around the world shows that China, India and some of the other most crowded countries in the developing world are just now entering the $3,000-to-$10,000 annual income range, a sweet spot in which car ownership tends to increase twice as fast as income. China's fleet is expected to grow at an annual growth rate of 11% to 390 million vehicles by 2030, from just 20 million six years ago. India's is forecast to increase at 8% annually over the same span.

Not coincidentally, Indian refineries are processing 9% more crude than they did a year ago, while China's consumption is expected to rise more than 5%, for a cumulative increase of 19% in three years. Meanwhile, the developed world will use less crude in 2008 than in 2005. The marginal energy consumer is not the soccer mom who's about to ditch the minivan for a compact. It's Asian factories that are among the world's least energy-efficient and a burgeoning middle class in South Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, all places where incomes are still keeping up with the rising cost of living.

They're already paying almost $6 per gallon in India, where rationed cooking fuels are cheap but gasoline is heavily taxed by the states. And since that retail price is fixed, consumers haven't been squeezed like they've been in the U.S. Europeans have cut back only slightly on gas that goes for more than $8 a gallon. In contrast, Saudi Arabia is bribing its underemployed young men with $1.25-a-gallon, or less than it costs to get the crude out of the ground. Other Mideast producers also offer lavish subsidies, fueling domestic demand and cutting the available exports accordingly.

1
2
Next
Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More:
Facebook
Twitter
Related Stories
Find More Articles About: Oil, Energy, Commodities, Economy
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
Bookmark and Share RSS
User Comments
Posted by: HowieG
What is going on seems to be parallel to price hike events of 1973. A 1992 book, titled 'A Century of War', by William Engdahl give insight as to the cause of the 1973 oil shock. Chapter 9 gives a good overview of careful orchestrations, by people in high places, that led to riches for oil companies and large banks, but poverty for marginal citizens around the world. Beneath the current 'Hot Air' is the truth, but capable people don't seem to be trying very hard to dredge it up.
Posted by: hayekcapitalist
Igor: Which financial show do you write for, SNL or Comedy Central? Only journalists and politicians think they know things that they are too uneducated about to know they don'tknow! The only time I held my breath about windfall profits taxes on XOM et al was the fear that this type of big brother inanity would prevail. I challenge your readers who read the big words and don't just look at the pictures to check their qualified plans and see how much of their retirment is dependent on 'Big Oil.' Oh, And Barack Hussein Obam's rationale for not supporting drill here and now: there wouldn't be any price relief for 5 yrs. I remember Clinton saying the same thing when he was in office; hint we would be pumping now...how long do you back of the class survey of earth science liberal arts majors think it would take to come up with a commerically viable large scale substitute for the internal combustion engine and fossil fuels...and substitutes for all of the uses of long chain carbons! Donkeys!...(Read more of this comment)
vernhuffer

80 Comments
Lighter cars with better visibility would save fuel and be safer for both occupants and pedestrians. All these Abrams, Bradley and Sherman replicas charging down our roads today make no sense. Hydrogen fuel? Did some of you forget your high school chemistry and physics? Hydrogen takes more energy to produce than it gives back.
Posted by: jc-vista
I do believe that we need to abandon oil as a fuel source and work on other sources like hydrogen and fuel cell technologies.
Also removal of tax shelters for the oil industry and windfall profit taxes should help correct the problems with undue energy prices across the commodities.
Public transportation in our area is fairly poor so this should be improved since public transportation needs to become more available because of the claimed lack of significant oils and usage increases from India, China and others.
Posted by: elipicayo
We don't need more oil. We don't need more Hybrids. We don't need electric cars. What we need are: Hydrogen generation systems, more Ethanol production, CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) engines on cars, fuel cell cars.

Why is it that none of the above are ever mentioned on articles about energy? Could it be something like 'payola', maybe?
Advertisements

Related Quotes

XOM 72.58 Up 0.08 0.11%