Sunday March 21, 2010 6:58 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published February 1, 2010  |  A A A
Tradecraft by Jonathan Hoenig (Author Archive)

How Not to Create Jobs

With unemployment at a 26-year-high, “jobs” have now replaced “home ownership” as the statistical benchmark by which politicians are measured. The president mentioned “jobs” more than 20 times during the State of the Union, and elected officials from both parties are readying a battery of proposals from cutting taxes to expanding TARP all designed to spur hiring.

One of the most frightening comes from Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (D., Ohio), who last week teased the media with his plan to “Create One Million Permanent Job Opportunities.” With large companies like Verizon (VZ) and Sam’s Club (WMT) laying off thousands of workers, how is that possible?

Kucinich’s scheme involves temporarily reducing the age to receive Social Security from 62 to 60, which would let an estimated four million people leave their jobs and begin collecting early benefits. Younger workers who are currently unemployed would then be able to take those jobs.

Congressman Kucinich falls prey to the “fixed pie fallacy,” falsely believing that there are a limited number of jobs available and that it’s his role as an elected official to allocate and distribute them as he thinks most appropriate.

“These are not temporary jobs but permanent jobs that already exist in our economy even under the current recessionary circumstances," said Kucinich, implying that, along with income, health care, natural resources and housing, these “permanent” jobs are the government’s responsibly to pass out.

The real intent, it would appear, is to enlarge our dependency on the government even amid a record deficit and burgeoning entitlement state.

Indeed, the congressman called for expanding Social Security to younger workers even before the economy collapsed. In 2003, he argued: “We need to reclaim the benefits of quality life extension for our seniors by reclaiming Social Security benefits at age 65. America can afford it. Social Security’s finances are more secure than ever.” For Kucinich, there’s never a bad time to expand the entitlement state.

1
2
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: LXBRanger
JH got a little carried away. The simple answer is that this gimmick does NOT create NEW jobs. It merely replaces people. If the newly retired people got new jobs which this plan discourages, then you would have new jobs. Lou B.
cgm205

111 Comments
I love this article. There is an email joke going around addressing this very subject. It begins with giving workers 60 or over $1mil then they could retire solving unemployment, buy a car solving GM etc, buy a home etc. It's a shame to see an actual U S Senator propose something as off the wall as this joke. Jonathan, you've nailed them again.
Thanks.

yieldpig

138 Comments
Or just do what everyone 40 and under does: work like it won't happen.
http://yieldpig.blogspot.com/

BackType
Comments From Around the Web
Posted by: CaptainBlack12 on Twitter

RT @JonathanHoenig: How Not to Create Jobs http://bit.ly/dk4aid $VZ $WMT $GOOG $YUM #Kucinich @Dennis_Kucinich

Posted by: librtycapitalst on Twitter

RT @JonathanHoenig: How Not to Create Jobs http://bit.ly/dk4aid $VZ $WMT $GOOG $YUM #Kucinich @Dennis_Kucinich

Advertisements
 
Retrieving data...

Related Quotes

VZ 30.41 Up 0.11 0.36%
WMT 55.34 Down -0.60 -1.07%
YUM 37.94 Down -0.21 -0.55%
GE 18.07 Down -0.12 -0.66%

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.