Thursday March 18, 2010 10:00 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published August 29, 2008  |  A A A
Economy by Will Swarts (Author Archive)

Pundits See Signs of More Trouble Ahead

THE MARKET BRIEFLY begged to differ, but the economy found no cure for the summertime blues, our pundits have concluded, pondering recession, oil prices and slowing growth. And autumn doesn't look much better.

Citigroup's chief economist Steven Wieting didn't savor the economic data released this morning. The exhaustion of tax rebates contributed to a 0.7% nominal drop in U.S. personal income and a 1.1% drop in disposable income in July, suggesting the economy won't get a further lift from financially stressed consumers.

Nor are companies faring much better. Merrill Lynch U.S. sector strategist Brian Belski noted on Aug. 21 that the 95% of U.S. companies that had reported second-quarter earnings as of then delivered a 22.3% drop in earnings from the year-ago quarter, the worst decline since the last three months of 2007.

"We continue to believe that the contagion effect of subprime- and credit-related issues within financials has largely been underestimated," Belski wrote. "Therefore, we believe there remains a high likelihood of additional weakness to earnings estimates heading into the months ahead until analysts and companies alike become even more conservative with their assumptions."

Others also see hard times ahead. "The stock market is telling us we have a greater likelihood of recession," wrote Liz Ann Sonders, chief strategist at Charles Schwab. In her August market summary, she argued that the widely cited International Monetary Fund estimate of $945 billion in loan losses stemming from the subprime mortgage collapse and subsequent credit crunch was probably too low. "It's clearly taking its toll on the economy."

Ed Hyman at the data-heavy firm ISI Research cited world-wide business climate surveys from Germany to Singapore in his Aug. 26 report, and said global growth is certainly slowing. The next day, he said the United States was in even worse shape. "Odds are increasing that the economy is slipping into recession," Hyman wrote. "Oil is key."

And with oil prices making unscheduled trips above $118 barrel during the week, energy prices were not going to help matters in the near term, though J.P. Morgan strategist Thomas Lee predicted on Aug. 26 that the market has already seen the worst.

"There is no clarity on the health of the global economy, but we are still viewing July 15 as the low," he wrote, citing an uptick in the Conference Board's Consumer Confidence Index for July. The survey came in at 56.9, up from 51.9 in June and 51.0 in May.

But Jeffrey Kleintop, chief market strategist at LPL Financial, took on the elephant in the room, addressing the woes of Freddie Mac (FMC) and Fannie Mae (FNM) in an Aug. 25 report. He wrote that the July 15 trough may yet hold up as the worst of the damage to the market, but "with no conclusion to the [Fannie and Freddie] insolvency crisis, the lingering uncertainty may have a renewed negative effect on the markets."

With that cheery thought, happy Labor Day.


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: haltheavenger
Under the new bankruptcy law, as of October 17, 2005 bankruptcy applicants who wish to file under Chapter 7 must meet certain eligibility requirements under a 'means test.'

Under the 'means test,' if your current monthly income is less than the median income in your state, you can file for bankruptcy under Chapter 7. But if your current monthly income is above the median income in your state, and you can afford to pay $100 per month toward paying off your debt, you cannot file under Chapter 7 and must proceed under Chapter 13 (more on Chapter 13 in the next section). Whether you can afford to pay $100 per month (or $6,000 over a five-year period) is based on a formula that includes your monthly income, your expenses, and the total amount of your debt.
Posted by: jhn_plsn
I do like the title 'Sentenced to a life of hard work', when I read that I was thinking why should I do like Paulson says and do the right thing to keep the banks steady. I should file BK just as they would, you know they would not hesitate. They knew what could happen when they allowed thier borrowers to become slaves to 30% CC rates and large penalties for a late payment and house payment resets that were out of this world. You may take this as a gripe session but the banks who are educated in the effects of thier own actions new what could happen and decided to seemingly ignore what was considered the backbone of economic stabillity, conservativeness, not high profits now and worry about the rest later. The politicians have not helped either allowing most of this to keep going by turning away instead of focussing on the stability. Ok off the soap box I go.
Advertisements
 
Retrieving data...

Related Quotes

FRE 1.32 Down -0.02 -1.49%
FNM 1.09 Down -0.03 -2.68%

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.