Sunday November 22, 2009 12:52 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published August 21, 2009  |  A A A
Ahead of the Curve by Donald Luskin (Author Archive)

Whole Foods-Style Health Care

I've written several columns over the last couple months about the attempts by Obama administration and the Democratic-controlled Congress to impose nationalized health-care insurance -- so-called "Obamacare." I've said it's bad for corporate profits, bad for the stock market, bad for the economy -- and even bad for people seeking quality health care.

I've never had such a huge volume of reader response to anything I've written here, and never so polarized. To half of you, I'm a messiah. To the other half, I'm a pariah. So I was glad to find support in this perilous position from one of my favorite CEOs, John Mackey, who runs one of my favorite companies: Whole Foods Market (WFMI).

Before I get into how Mackey and Whole Foods play into the Obamacare debate, let me just say a few words about this wonderful company. Back in 1980, when Whole Foods started, if anyone had asked the question, "Does the world really need another chain of supermarkets?" the answer would certainly have been "no." But from a single store in Austin, Texas, Whole Foods now has more than 280 stores in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom.

They've done it by catching the new wave of the way people want to eat and shop now. They want all the amenities of a supermarket -- variety, low prices, large inventories. But they want higher-quality food -- healthier, lighter, organic, in an environment that doesn't blare commercialism and dehumanization.

Whole Foods' stock has pretty much risen and fallen with the market over the last several years. In the recession, the company has had to pare back growth plans, and the widespread belief that consumers are going to have to scrimp and save for a while has led investors to question whether a "high-end" grocery store can thrive.

I think the stock is cheap. The recession is over, and Whole Foods will surely start expanding again. And it's a mistake to think of it as a "high-end" retailer. One of the things I love about it is that its prices are so competitive -- especially adjusted for the higher-quality level, on average. As confidence in the economy and the U.S. consumer comes back, I think Whole Foods could have a nice run.

But back to the matter of Obamacare. Another reason Whole Foods became a success is the way CEO Mackey runs the business. Here, too, Whole Foods caught a new wave. Whole Foods has always had a philosophy of treating its employees as intelligent human beings, empowering them to made decisions not normally delegated to people who might otherwise be seen as unskilled labor, and giving them significant incentives to improve their performance and productivity. Part of his formula for treating employees well has been the company's approach to health-care benefits.

He talked about it in a commentary in the Wall Street Journal last week. Here's the essence of it:

Whole Foods Market pays 100% of the premiums for all our team members …for our high-deductible health-insurance plan. We also provide up to $1,800 per year in additional health-care dollars through deposits into employees' Personal Wellness Accounts to spend as they choose on their own health and wellness.

And then later on:

Our team members therefore spend their own health-care dollars until the annual deductible is covered (about $2,500) and the insurance plan kicks in. This creates incentives to spend the first $2,500 more carefully.

Do you see the essence of what he has done? First, by offering high-deductible insurance, he has returned the whole concept of health insurance back to what it should have been all along -- a safety net against the really bad health catastrophes. Second, by giving employees the funding to pay for their own care when they just get the sniffles, he returns health care to the discipline that all other markets for any other kind of service have to face -- consumers making careful decisions about how to spend their own money.

1
2
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Rthomas61

5 Comments
bluedag, Where are you getting your figures that going from a $500 deductible to a $2,500 deductible only saves 21%? (Your figures were $800/monthly going to $633/monthly with the $2500 deductible.) My family of four paid $322/monthly in 2008 taking the $2,500 deductible but it would have been over $1,000 with the $500.
Posted by: castaway5555
Ever since the post WW2 era when America linked health insurance to employment, the system has been slowly deteriorating. Now, with the demise and/or globalization of our largest corporations and changing employment patterns - from a single job to at least seven jobs in a life-time, it's crashing and burning. Sure, hats off to Whole Foods for trying, or whatever. But it's not going to work. It, too, will fail, either from management's end (see FedEx) or it will be crushed by costs.

The American worker needs a safe and reliable source of health insurance for herself and her family. Every American needs this and deserves this, because we are, at heart, a great and generous nation, and we can do this, as have most of the other civilized nations of the world.

The wealthy will always be able to afford their own programs - and they can opt out if they wish, just like folks can opt out of Social Security at the first signing.

Beneath all of this is a simple notion ...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: bluedag
Investor85 says "Lets say the 500 (deductible) plan costs $800/month, and the 2500 plan costs $400/month". Actually if 500 is $800, 2500 would be about $633 per month (sub $2000/12). My employer, a very well known US corporation offers us a variety of plans and we pick and pay for what we want. The company says they spend $7000 per employee per year but it is hard to see where the $7000 goes. This same company use to give everyone totally paid for insurance that actually covered just about everything. It can no longer afford to do so due to the run away cost of health care and the competition from foreign corporations who don't have to provide their employees with insurance because the government does it. Everyone supporting Whole Foods just looks at the employee cost. It is when you include dependents that it really gets unaffordable. I'd guess they provide the high ded policy & $1800 for the employee only.
Posted by: Investor85
Couple of things to think about:
From employer's perspective, the deductible is the biggest factor in making coverage affordable. If employer has choice between $500 deductible plan and $2500 deductible plan. Lets say the 500 plan costs $800/month, and the 2500 plan costs $400/month; for a year of coverage, that's a savings of $4800 per employee. They can afford to pay the full premium on the 2500 plan, pay $1800 of each employee's deductible, and still make out better than if they bought the 500 plan. That makes it more likely they'll provide coverage.
Also keep in mind that when you buy coverage, you are buying coverage for things you will never use, like maternity coverage for men, urology for women. Why throw money away on things you'll never use?
Now, as for that colonoscopy that you decided not to get. You now have the option of making that decision. Under a government-run plan, lets say the US Colonoscopy Association makes a sizable donation to certain important Cong...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: btcutter
Simple annual physical exam is about $100. Add blood work $50 total $150.

Most people who claim that they can't find $150(per year) for the exam are the same who actually eats out, have cable tv, cellphone, starbuck.....etc.

Often we CHOOSE to not use our $ for health maintenance. For some reason, it's just not that important to us. Maybe that's why 75% of the population is overweight.

Personally, I really believe that consumers (patients) must be made responsible for their own health care dollars or else they will spend freely without thinking.
Advertisements

Related Quotes

WFMI 26.36 Down -0.61 -2.26%