Saturday November 21, 2009 3:39 AM ET
SmartMoney
Published January 10, 2007  |  A A A
SmartMoney Magazine by Janet Paskin and Nicole Bullock

The 35 Best Mutual Funds

WHAT CAN SMARTMONEY tell you about mutual funds that you don't already know? After all, the fund industry now manages about $10 trillion in assets, and knowledgeable investors — in other words, you — have learned what to look for: high returns, experienced managers and reasonable fees. But these days there's a huge potential pitfall that even savvy shareholders can easily miss — invisible costs.
Also See

New research suggests that Americans may be paying a lot more than they realize for the privilege of owning shares in a mutual fund. Fund fees, of course, have gotten plenty of attention in recent years, spurring even casual investors to keep an eye on what they're paying. But when funds trade excessively, or make moves that trigger capital-gains taxes, the investor takes another hit. Indeed, costs like these can siphon away thousands of dollars in returns over time — and most of them never show up on fund statements.

According to a new, unpublished study, trading costs at the typical diversified U.S. stock fund add up to 1 to 1.25% of assets. "The real question is whether the expenditures lead to better returns," says Gregory Kadlec, a professor at Pamplin College of Business at Virginia Tech and one of the study's authors. The answer? Generally, no. On average, funds recoup in gains only about half of what they spend on trades, says Kadlec: "The other half is dead weight on performance."

Research based on data from fund tracker Morningstar suggests one way that the weight can get heavy. Over the past one, three, five and 10 years, funds that ranked in the lowest 25% in turnover, a rough measure of how often they trade, have earned two to three percentage points more on an annual basis than those in the highest quartile. Brokerage commissions on transactions are one factor that drives up costs. Additionally, when a fund dumps or scoops up a big block of shares, its own transactions can also move the stock price. That phenomenon, known as market impact, can make the trades less advantageous for shareholders. And a fund's capital gains can be taxed at up to 35%. Granted, some funds that trade furiously still generate stellar returns, but they're more the exception that proves the rule.

As we searched for the top funds, we discovered that many of the managers who trade best trade least. Their funds are the focus of this year's guide. To track down our top 35, we started with funds from seven categories, each with great records and promising outlooks. Then we factored in the difference between returns before and after taxes. We also looked for funds that minimize trading and tax costs by holding down turnover — the percentage of the portfolio that gets replaced each year. Finally, we eliminated funds whose combination of expense ratios and 12b-1 marketing fees was too high. Most of our picks have no 12b-1 charges at all, so you may pay a transaction fee if you buy them from fund supermarkets like those at Fidelity or Charles Schwab. Buy them directly from the fund companies and you'll avoid that fee — one more hidden cost you're leaving behind.

The Best of...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: frank4stock
BEST LONG TERM MUTUAL FUNDS? ANYONE? PLEASE
Posted by: fundmojo
Some of these funds don't performance and have high volatility. For example, USAA Aggressive Growth (USAUX). If you look at the fund in depth, it under-performs its peer in 1 year and 5 years, and narrowly outperform its peer in 3 years, sharpe ratio is bad (<1), and morningstar rating is only 2 or 3. Fundmojo gives it a very low score: http://www.fundmojo.com/mutualfund/fund_report.php?mutualfund=USAUX. I would do some due-diligence before buying into any of these funds.
Posted by: tsupacat
I know mutual funds are supposed to be a great thing, but are they really? What's so great about 35% in five years when you can earn that yearly with a strict model of investment in the futures market. I don't see anything great about buy and hold on strategies.
Posted by: jeanp6
I would have appreciated an xls on these funds, like consumer rep does. I had to make my own.
Posted by: exskinman
amoss77. Look at ADVDX and LSBRX.
Advertisements

Related Quotes

PRGFX 26.52 Down -0.07 -0.26%
AMAGX 20.62 Down -0.06 -0.29%
TPVIX 12.85 Up 0.11 0.86%
USAUX 27.97 Down -0.04 -0.14%

Fund Compare

See how the funds on this page stack up.