Wednesday March 17, 2010 7:22 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published January 29, 2009  |  A A A
Stocks by Andrew Bary (Author Archive)

Warren Buffett's Unhappy New Year

Barrons

EVEN GREAT INVESTORS MAKE MISTAKES. Warren Buffett's affinity for a group of financial stocks, including American Express (AXP), Wells Fargo (WFC) and U.S. Bancorp (USB), is likely hurting his equity returns in 2009.

Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has sizable holdings in that trio, and the sizable declines in their share prices this year are dragging down Berkshire's (BRK.A) vaunted equity portfolio, which totaled $76 billion at the end of the third quarter, the latest reporting period.

We estimate Berkshire's equity portfolio could have dropped 14% in 2009 through Thursday, against an 8% decline in the S&P 500.

Our estimate is based on the change in value of Berkshire's 16 largest equity holdings. These holdings historically have accounted for over 85% of Berkshire's portfolio. The tough 2009 follows a good showing in 2008, when Berkshire's equity positions declined -- by our estimate -- about 25%, 13 percentage points better than the S&P 500. Our calculations for 2009 are based on Berkshire's reported holdings on Sept. 30. There admittedly may have been some changes since.

Wells Fargo is Berkshire's biggest loser in 2009, as shares of the California bank were down nearly 50% through Thursday to about 16. Buffett couldn't be reached for comment, but his view on the financial sector has been to buy quality. At Berkshire's annual meeting last May, Buffett said: "We like the culture at Wells Fargo, M&T and U.S. Bancorp. In all three cases, I understand the DNA of management. That doesn't mean they won't have problems," according to a meeting attendee. (Berkshire owns a stake in Buffalo's M&T Bank [MTB].)

Our guess is that if any of these companies needs an equity investor, Berkshire stands ready to help. And the stocks are so volatile they could turn higher at any time.

The paper losses on Berkshire's equity portfolio this year, plus losses on its short position in some $37 billion of equity puts, have depressed Berkshire class A shares, which finished Friday at $86,250, down 10% in 2009. Barron's wrote bearishly on Berkshire in late 2007 when the stock traded at $144,000 and we turned bullish in late November with the shares just above current levels.

When it reported third-quarter results in November, Berkshire said shareholder equity fell by $9 billion, or nearly $6,000 a share, through the end of October given weak markets. We estimate book value probably ended 2008 around $70,000 a share. Current book value may have dropped close to $67,000 a share. If we're right, Berkshire trades for a still-reasonable 1.3 times book value and 14 times projected 2009 earnings of around $6,000 a share.

After a flurry of high-profile investments in early October, including $5 billion in Goldman Sachs preferred carrying a 10% dividend, and a similar $3 billion deal involving General Electric , Berkshire hasn't unveiled any big new investments. Why? Our guess is that its once-enormous cash hoard has been depleted.

Berkshire's insurance cash holdings, which stood at $27 billion on Sept. 30, likely fell to $13 billion after the Goldman (GS) and GE (GE) deals, as well as a $6.5 billion investment in junk bonds and preferred stock of Wrigley, which was bought by Mars. Berkshire also is on the hook for a $3 billion convertible preferred-stock investment in Dow Chemical (DOW) if it completes its purchase of Rohm & Haas (ROH). Some investors say Berkshire likes to keep $10 billion of cash to deal with unexpected insurance claims arising from an earthquake or hurricane. This wouldn't leave Berkshire much cash for a big investment unless it sells something or takes on debt.

Our guess is that if Berkshire did make more fourth-quarter investments, they were focused on the battered junk-bond market. Berkshire will disclose more on investments in its annual report, due around March 1.

The Bottom Line
Berkshire's class A shares are down 10% in 2009 to $86,250, a reasonable level that we estimate at 1.3 times book and 14 times projected 2009 earnings of $6,000 a share. That looks appealing.

More From Barron's

Want to read more from Barron's? Try Barron's Online for four weeks FREE! Click here.


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
User Comments
Posted by: stock_ss
conkjc, yep I think it's important to look long term, however with the short term so volatile and overall trend being down, it is prudent not to buy into equities simply because they are fundamentally sound. I also think the markets will take 5 years or so to correct and rebuild confidence and until then it's going to be a rocky road down.

Also consider that looking long term is probably viable for younger people, but for those nearing retirement age of around 60+, "long" term could constitute 10+ years. 10 years for your assets to come back to the same value as today (or last year)? You'll be long dead if you don't have any money to buy food!

My main point is that the bear is here to stay for a long time. Therefore get real serious about prudent research into the right assets to invest in (or more safe - stay in cash). If you're fighting the overall (down) trend, you'll have to be very fortunate/lucky/prudent to find those few nuggets that defy gravity.

P...(Read more of this comment)
conkjc

3 Comments
stock_ss
I think you are saying the same thing that I am. Investing in this market demands extensive research be taken prior to investment. The era of easy money is over. Regarding Buffet, his selection of stocks is second to none. While some of his largest selections are down, (ie. Wells Fargo and Dow Chemical), I doubt that they are going under. Long term, money will return to the markets, but it is going to take some time for some major issues to be corrected and confidence to build. Personally, I would not be surprised if this recession lasts for the next few years. However, the industry leaders, those companies that excercised prudent busisness practices and lead in their respective markets will long term come out ahead and be strong long term investments. If the likes of Coke, Proctor and Gamble,Kraft, Wells Fargo, Geico and Walmart go under, you mine as well kiss equities and any savings good bye.
Posted by: stock_ss
The bear is snacking at the moment and then should go for a nap. After his nap lasting several months, he'll wake up and be hungry. Don't stand in his way!! The more he eats, the more he'll want. He's making up for the many years he slept!

Be a bear or a very cautious bull!
Posted by: stock_ss
Direct response to conkjc: The true winners in this severe economic downturn are those who put forth the effort to understand sentiment in the markets they trade/invest and turn off CNBC. For long equity plays, seek out those companies who are already strong, and will continue to do well in a recession, and for goodness sakes, look for strength in their price charts! Later in 2009 should reveal some decent long side opportunities (via bear market rally), whilst 2010 should yield to the bear.
Posted by: stock_ss
yes Warren knows a LITTLE bit, but still not ENOUGH. 2010 will see Warren eaten by the BEAR that's going to roar big time at buy and hold investors who fail to accept that this is a different market to the bull they have been accustomed to over the past many years. This is not a minor correction, it's a major one that will correct the excesses of the past and should end in many years with the Dow below 1000 points.

Good luck trading the rallies if you're so inclined, but monitor the market often for signs of the rally faltering back to the downtrend.
Advertisements

Related Quotes

AXP 41.01 Up 0.09 0.22%
WFC 30.55 Up 0.27 0.89%
USB 26.21 Up 0.09 0.34%
123757.10 Up 182.10

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.