Monday November 23, 2009 2:00 AM ET
SmartMoney
Published February 1, 2008  |  A A A
Stocks by Dan Burrows (Author Archive)

And the Big Winner Is...Google?

YAHOO (YHOO) shareholders are heaving huge sighs of relief right now. Microsoft's (MSFT) bear hug of a bid for the leading destination on the web looks like an offer it can't refuse. So much for Yahoo being a value trap.

As for Google (GOOG) investors, this is hardly what they wanted to hear. Not after last night, when the search giant missed Street estimates and showed that its awesome growth rate is slowing. Still, the proposed union between its two biggest rivals is a testament of sorts to Google's dominance in paid search as well as a threat to that state of affairs.

It's certainly more fun owning Yahoo today. And it'll sure be nice for shareholders to get some of their money back. But what an inglorious closing chapter this would be for a company that once held out so much promise. At $31 a share, Microsoft's $45 billion offer represents a whopping 62% premium to Yahoo's Thursday closing price. We don't mean to rain on Yahoo's parade, but the fact that $31 a share seems so nice shows just how messed up Yahoo had become.

The company's disappointing fourth-quarter earnings report and lousy guidance late Tuesday knocked the stock down to levels not seen since 2003. Microsoft's offer has the shares rallying, alright — to a level they held just three months ago. And even if you bought Yahoo a year ago, $31 is just your money back.

It's possible — but not probable — that another bidder will emerge. At least the market doesn't think so: Yahoo isn't trading above $31. And it's easy to see why. Microsoft has a market cap of more than a quarter of a trillion dollars and about $21 billion in cash and short-term investments. The sheer size of the offer will make it very challenging for Yahoo co-founder and chief executive Jerry Yang to stay out of Microsoft's clutches.

"I think Microsoft is the last company Jerry would want to sell to, but I don't think he's going to have a choice," says Darren Chervitz, director of research at the Jacob Internet Fund (JAMFX), which holds a stake in Yahoo.

The proposed deal is so big that any other suitor (except, ironically, Google) would almost certainly have to borrow money and offer more of its stock instead of cash. With credit markets tight and shareholders not enamored of dilution, where else can Jerry go? "I have a tough time seeing how management can do anything other than to get Microsoft to maybe raise its bid a little bit," Chervitz says.

Microsoft has courted Yahoo before, with good reason. With nearly 60% of the U.S. market share, Google has run away with the lucrative and fast growing search advertising market, and it's doing so at Yahoo's and Microsoft's expense. Those two command less than 20% and 10% of the market, respectively.

If a Microsoft-Yahoo combination manages to avoid the integration and execution pitfalls common to big mergers it could become a viable, perhaps formidable, competitor to Google, with the scale to be a clear No. 2 option for advertisers. But as for this changing the game for Google, I doubt that the three amigos of Mountain View are squirming in their massage chairs.

For one thing, as Citigroup analyst Mark Mahaney wrote Friday, the offer's valuation seems to support Google's current share price. I'd add that since Google is a faster growing, more nimble company than Microsoft or Yahoo, it probably deserves some sort of premium. And let's not forget how entrenched Google is as the search leader. Even if the deal gets done, it's not lights out for Google, Mahaney noted.

1
2
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: jordansmith
While any major corporate enterprise runs the risk of hacking and viral invasion, Microsoft has a long history of attacks. The number of techno-Band Aids needed to patch IE, for example, has prompted many users to seek other browsers, particularly Mozilla's superior (and ad-free)Firefox. Adding Yahoo to Microsoft's technology base is not going to solve IE's problems; indeed, it well could exacerbate them.

The bottom line is that it's way too soon to predict anything technologically or financially superior coming out of this possible acquisition: except perhaps that Google will be expected to provide further revenue-providing innovations, at which they've demonstrated themselves to be masters. MicroHoo may one day rise to Google's heights, but it's probably going to be a long and difficult journey technologically. Don't expect Yahoo to improve overnight: and it could lose even more of its customer base in the process of being assimilated by Microsoft.
Posted by: CasualReader
Was glad to see you quoting an expert that 1) users aren't going to change their search engine preferences because of this merger and 2) it will take a long time for Microsoft-Yahoo to prove their search advertising platform is equal to/better than Google's.

Neither Microsoft or Yahoo are innovative in the late 00's. Google is ascendant. This merger is the last gasp of a dying desktop paradigm. Atlas shrugged.
Advertisements

Related Quotes

YHOO 15.38 Down -0.23 -1.47%
MSFT 29.62 Down -0.16 -0.54%
GOOG 569.96 Down -3.03 -0.53%
 

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.