Sunday November 8, 2009 6:19 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published January 28, 2008  |  A A A
Tradecraft by Jonathan Hoenig (Author Archive)

French Trader Paid Price for Leverage, Hubris

IN BUSINESS, FRAUD is a fact of life, but not a way of life. As regulators and politicians begin to comb through the details of how 31-year-old Jerome Kerviel's unauthorized trades blew up into the biggest trading fiasco in the history of modern financial markets, let's not overlook that this was not a systemic flaw of capitalism or profit-seeking banks, but a lone, disturbed trader who, by circumventing the bank's risk controls, put thousands of fellow employees' jobs at risk.

Although the investigation is far from over, it would appear that Kerviel blew up for the same reasons that brought down Brian Hunter, Nick Leeson and so many others: huge positions, zero discipline and an overriding need to be right.

How big was Kerviel betting? Anyone who thinks that the free market can be muscled or manipulated, should consider the fact that Kerviel's trades were valued north of $83 billion dollars, bigger than the bank at which he worked, bigger than the gross domestic product of Slovakia, Qatar or Libya, and the equivalent of about half of France's gold and currency reserves. Sacre Bleu!

The fact that he was able to deploy such immense firepower in his trades — $44 billion into the Eurostoxx index and $26 billion into the German DAX, for example — and still have it move sharply against him shows that nobody is bigger than the market. You can bet an entire multinational bank that XYZ is going to rise... and it can just as easily fall. Whether you are a rogue trader betting billions or Joe Sixpack wielding an E*Trade (ETFC) account, it is impossible to reliably muscle the market into going your way — no matter how much you buy.

When looking at the list of the largest publicized trading losses, it's worth noting that the majority of them were facilitated by trading in futures, options or other derivatives, all highly leveraged contracts that permit big bets with little money down. Whether it's an Internet stock or residential mortgage, oversized positions can be fatal. When the market moves against you — and it always does, eventually — rogue traders and regular folks alike find that leverage can quickly torpedo a portfolio whose risk far exceeds the capital standing behind it.

NameSize of LossEmployerSource of LossYear
Jérôme Kerviel
$7.1 billionSociété GénéraleEuropean index futures2008
Brian Hunter
$6.5 billionAmaranth AdvisorsGas futures2006
John Meriwether
$4.6 billionLong Term Capital ManagementInterest rate and equity derivatives1998
Yasuo Hamanaka
$2.6 billionSumitomo CorporationCopper futures1996
Wolfgang Flöttl, Helmut Elsner
$2.5 billionBAWAGCurrency and interest swaps2006
Robert Citron
$1.7 billionOrange CountyInterest rate derivatives1994
Nick Leeson
$1.4 billionBarings BankNikkei futures1995
Heinz Schimmelbusch
$1.3 billionMetallgesellschaftOil futures1993
Toshihide Iguchi
$1.1 billionDaiwa BankBonds1995
Source: Wikipedia
1
2
Next
Find More Articles About: Stocks, Investing
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
Bookmark and Share RSS
User Comments
cgm205

106 Comments
I love stories about wheeler dealers, speculators, and con artists. It continues to amaze me how they get away with it so long. I forget that most average people don't think like they do and are not continually on the lookout for the scam and the remainder get hooked on their greed or knavery.
Posted by: pat2153
Vanity and greed...one in the same.
Posted by: dave583
Greed is always involved. Thats why youre here.
Posted by: cwrasmith
You are ill-informed! His trades were such big winners that he needed losses to keep from being exposed. When he was creating the losses is when he was discovered. When found out the bank liquidated all of his positions therefore incurring the loss. So, in other words, he didn't do this by himself!
Posted by: hbehler
Jerome Kerviel is only a pawn in a big game SG played. Why do you think SG managers agressively sold SG stock the last weeks?
But your point is the discussion of risk - very well done - a pleasure to read, like always!
Advertisements