Monday March 22, 2010 8:33 AM ET
SmartMoney
Published May 22, 2008  |  A A A
Tradecraft by Jonathan Hoenig (Author Archive)

Greens, Pols Unfairly Point Fingers at Big Oil

IT'S MORE THAN a little bewildering to me that so many of our elected officials are downright clueless as to the basic economic principles most of us learned in Econ 101.

The price for anything, be it a share of stock, a gallon of gas or a Hannah Montana concert ticket, isn't arbitrary but governed by supply and demand. Oil companies can't unsustainably manipulate the price of gas any more than McDonald's (MCD) can unrealistically jack up the price of a hamburger. Rightly so, both companies charge what the market will bear.

As oil executives pointed out numerous times during Wednesday's Congressional hearings, the vast majority of the cost of gasoline stems from the price of crude oil, which has been hitting record highs for weeks. And yes, record prices for crude have led to record profits for oil companies.

But while profits are big, so is the scope of accomplishing what oil companies do every day. Unleaded doesn't magically appear at the service station. It takes massive investment to keep the nation stocked with safe, reliable sources of energy. The profit margin enjoyed by big oil companies is around 8.3%, less than earned by the average computer company, bank, electrical equipment manufacturer or restaurant. Yet Congress isn't ready to accuse IHOP (IHP) of gouging you on your Rooty Tooty Fresh 'N Fruity breakfast, is it?

Energy ETFs YTD: USO (crude oil), UNG (natural gas), UHN (heating oil), UGA (gasoline).

Like Wal-Mart or any other successful large enterprise, it's we who make Big Oil big. Profits come as a result of providing a service most Americans are happy and willing to pay for. Indeed, even gas at current prices hasn't markedly affected domestic consumption. Indeed, many of those who complain about $4 gasoline from Exxon Mobil (XOM) don't hesitate to buy a $4 latte at Starbucks (SBUX).

1
2
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: pcronce
Part II:

Without exposing more of the flawed reasoning in the article, I simply ask how one can believe the 8.3% profit figure when the newspapers tout 40 and 50% profit increases quarterly? 8.3% of what? revenues? Is this a fair and reliable figure on which to base our national discussion on energy? which is, by the way, what Congress is doing. They are not 'grilling' profiteering oil executives but trying to begin a national discussion in a venue designed for such a purpose (when other branches of government are not).

P.S. Kudos to Jonathon when he sticks to trading and investing, but politics and governmental policy are not his forte...
Posted by: pcronce
There is so much wrong with this article, that reader's should take a critical thinking class at their local community college (if they can still afford that). Aside from the typical Ayn Rand ideological bend that is literally and metaphysically irresponsible, the larger question of what genuine freedom is escapes our author and many of his readers. True freedom is NOT $5 gas and unbridled profiteering however unpatriotic this may sound. Perhaps reading Sartre (or Schelling's essay on human freedom would help). Secondly, higher prices do not necessitate research into alternatives; they necessitate higher prices and more profit. And if the logical consequence of higher profits is more research and development into the product producing the profits, not alternative products that would require greater initial expenditures to bring to market. And greater R and D expenditures will not produce more of the profitable product when it is a non-renewable and declining resource.
Posted by: SmilinMelvin
Bull****. I'd say there's a distinction between gas and pancakes. Gas is a necessity for most people, pancakes and lattes are not. What Congress and the nation are angry about is a virtual oil monopoly based on industry collusion. And as Iraq as demonstrated, it's now common knowledge that oil companies are criminal enterprises. So why should we start believing a bunch of slimeballs now?
merlinaut

40 Comments
'Greens generally don't advocate against carbon energy, but any energy. Their efforts have curtailed coal, nuclear, wind ? any technology that's actually effective in helping to power the modern industrialized economy'?! I'm not sure THAT's true at all! Greens have been working HARD on alternative energy.
[By 'Greens', I'm not clear whether you mean environmentalists or the Green party.]
Posted by: abdellatom
Yes, greed is good, and greed will find a way to a solution. It is truly astounding that the Senate has the audacity to call business leaders to Washington to explain their actions at all. In a free country corporations should be able do as they please, barring harm to others, and Congress should mind its own 'business.' The idea that the government has the right to declare a moratorium on drilling for oil or any of the other loony left earth child concoctions is preposterous and we're paying the price at the pump and at the grocery store. Whenever I talk to Americans about this they are outraged that Washington has these moratoriums on energy development. Americans have solid gold common sense and I think the days of the quack science ecofreaks are numbered.
Advertisements
 
Retrieving data...

Related Quotes

XOM 67.04 - 0.00 0.00%
BP 57.69 - 0.00 0.00%
WMT 55.34 - 0.00 0.00%
MCD 66.53 - 0.00 0.00%

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.