Tuesday November 24, 2009 9:28 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published December 30, 2008  |  A A A
Common Sense by James B. Stewart (Author Archive)

Lessons From the Madoff Scandal

If you had the good fortune never to have invested in what may end up being the biggest Ponzi scheme in history, count your blessings. An alleged fraud like this could have happened to any of us, as it did to some of the world’s most sophisticated investors. There are lessons here, though not necessarily the ones that have been touted by much of the media.

Now that some of the dust is settling around the Bernard Madoff scandal -- he allegedly admitted to bilking his investors out of at least $50 billion -- there has been a growing tendency in some quarters to blame the victims, at least in part. According to these theories, they should have recognized that annual returns of around 10% in both good times and bad were too good to be true. They should have been suspicious of Madoff’s vague explanations of how he arrived at those results. And to the extent he described his strategy, which involved the simultaneous purchase of stock and sale of option contracts, they should have noticed that there wasn’t sufficient volume in those options trades to account for the reported gains.

The lesson from such criticisms, I suppose, is that we should all turn ourselves into forensic accountants. I find that preposterous, not to mention distasteful, given that some of these people have lost their life savings. After all, consistent returns in good and bad markets are the selling point for nearly every hedge fund. There are plenty that have reported much larger annual returns without raising eyebrows. Indeed, Madoff's returns were good, but not so spectacular as to raise undue suspicion. As for his vague explanations, they were no vaguer than those of many other hedge fund managers and even mutual fund managers. No one wants to give away his or her trade secrets. And as for the volume of trading in options contracts, what investor has the time for that kind of detective work, even assuming it might have revealed some irregularities?

True, some potential investors examined Madoff’s operation and declined to invest. The same could be said for nearly every other hedge fund. In 2006, one potential investor actually branded it a Ponzi scheme and took his suspicions to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC investigated and, amazingly, gave Madoff a clean bill of health after he corrected some minor issues. How that could have happened remains one of the big unanswered questions of this affair, and the SEC owes the public a detailed explanation. Nonetheless, Madoff’s victims can surely be forgiven for relying on what is supposed to be a watchdog agency.

Still, there were some red flags, and lessons that we should all take to heart.

• Madoff’s books were audited by a virtually unknown accounting firm and apparently just by one man. So the simple but vital lesson here is to never invest in anything — hedge fund, partnership, mutual fund — whose books aren’t audited by a recognized accounting firm with a strong reputation and numerous clients, preferably one of the Big Four. Check your investments for the name of the firm that provides the audit. If you don’t recognize it, research it on the Internet. This simple step would have saved investors from the alleged Madoff fraud.

• Diversify. This is obvious, but bears repeating given the many stories of people and institutions who tied up almost all their assets with Madoff. While it's especially hard to reduce an asset that seems to be doing so well, it's the essence of rebalancing and diversification. After all, it doesn’t take a fraud to expose the folly of concentrating too many assets in one place. A sharp market correction can have the same damaging effect.

• Don’t believe anyone who tells you that you can earn higher returns while assuming a lower risk. This is the mantra of every con man I’ve ever known. If you’re realizing high returns, you’re also accepting increased risk.

• Don't rely on middlemen. Many Madoff investors were steered into their investments by highly-compensated advisors. With the proliferation of hedge funds and other alternative investment opportunities, such middlemen have grown increasingly popular. Many people don’t want to have to think about their investments, but you can’t abdicate all responsibility.

• At the same time, don’t lose your faith in human nature. I spoke last week to a money manager with an unblemished reputation for integrity who had just spent four hours defending herself to a client who said she couldn’t trust anyone in the wake of the Madoff scandal. Madoff is an especially shocking example given that he allegedly defrauded his own sons, close friends, and charitable institutions he purported to support. But he is an aberration. The vast majority of money managers are honest, hard-working professionals with their clients’ best interests at heart. The financial system operates on trust backed up by regulation. Both failed in Madoff’s case, but that doesn’t mean everyone is a crook.


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS ETrade
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: janhollywood
Victims are SELDOM at fault! Whatever sector they are in - once targeted by the con - puts them and others like them in harms way. BUT the true investment con with criminal intent is a tough creature to steer clear of. They have been working on a plan to get your money for as long as it has taken you to save it!!

Agencies that govern investment behavior have to be given evidence and told there are problems. Not just by one or two investors --- but the entire lot of them. The trouble lies with the investors who do nothing when the early warning signs appear! By the time the hard facts are out that their money is gone - they wonder why no one was there to help them.

You must keep your eye on your investment - ALWAYS! And tell someone, tell EVERYONE if something goes awry!

Mr. Stewart, I have story worthy of your review. Your readers deserve the lid to be blown off the scam artists that push the term FRAUD to a whole new level.

Please contact ...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: mikewentzell
The Monday morning quarterbacks who berate the victims for "putting all their eggs in one basket" or for "not diversifying" are clueless. My family's monthly statements from Madoff ran 6 pages in length and detailed a diversified array of blue chip holdings (GE, J&J, etc) and/or treasuries. In addition, this was not a hedge fund, as many misinformed journalists have reported. Although the statements and trades (if there really were any) were complex, it is no different that having all your stock and bond holdings with any single investment advisor. The vast majority of investors do not "diversify" among multiple advisors. They diversify in a variety of stock and bond holdings under the umbrella of a single investment firm, whether that is Charles Schwab, Fidelity, Morgan Stanley or Madoff.

In their race to blame the victims, the Monday morning quarterbacks are adding guilt to tragic losses borne by victims who thought they were diversified.
Posted by: HowieG
A thought on the Jewish connection. It is very common for a con artist to look for marks with trusting affiliations. It makes no matter, the religious / ethnic group. "If you can't trust your 'brother', who can you trust?" makes for easy pickings.
Posted by: corbrwl
The Madoff fraud scandall is nothing compared to the largest ponzi scheme of all time, the US Social Security system.
Posted by: cdgcpa
Mr. Stewart,
Your comment about big CPA firms is WRONG.
And you should retract your comment.

Bigger is NOT better:
Have you forgotten ENRON????
Think big CPA firm: Arthur Andersen
HOW ABOUT ZZZZBEST, BARRY MINKOW AND YES BIG CPA FIRM ARTHUR YOUNG!!!

THE LIST GOES ON AND IS ENDLESS.

THERE ARE MORE SMALL CPA FIRMS DOING BETTER WORK
THAN BIG FIRMS.

THE FACT OF THE MADOFF MATTER IS THIS:
THERE ARE MORE AUDIT CONFIRMATIONS
SENT AND RECEIVED BY BIG 4 CPA FIRMS
FOR THE VARIOUS FUND OF FUNDS. DON'T YOU
THINK THERE WERE A FEW BIG FIRMS
AUDITING THE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS
INVESTED IN MADOFF FUNDS????
THE BIG 4 ARE ALL RUNNING FOR COVER RIGHT NOW.

HERE IS ANOTHER FACT: SERIOUS FRAUD AND
COLLUSION IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO DETECT!!

LOOK AT AIG, CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS, AND
SUB PRIME MORTGAGES!!! THERE ARE MANY
COMPANIES AND INVESTORS THAT DID AVOID
THESE MASSIVE FRAUDS AND COLLUS...(Read more of this comment)
Advertisements