Monday November 23, 2009 8:06 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published May 28, 2008  |  A A A
Stocks by Dan Burrows (Author Archive)

Microsoft Looks to Apple for OS Ideas

A LONG-HELD KNOCK against Microsoft (MSFT) is that it steals everybody else's best ideas. (It's true.) But if there's one thing you can say after the software giant gave a sneak preview of its next operating system, at least it steals from the best.

Dubbed Windows 7 for now, the new OS boasts multitouch, gesture control screen capabilities a la Apple's (AAPL) iPhone. It's terrific technology, and to be fair, Microsoft's had this sort of thing on hand for a while, as evidenced by the Surface, a kind of computer-in-a-coffee-table aimed at retailers.

Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates and Chief Executive Steve Ballmer showed off the gesture control — the most salient feature of the new OS — at The Wall Street Journal's "D: All Things Digital" conference on Tuesday. It looks very pretty, and pretty cool, too. It also looks largely impractical.

The ability to rotate, re-size and flip images — or play a virtual piano — using just your fingers on a laptop screen is no doubt a neat and potentially useful trick, as shown by the demo.

That's great and all, but how many PC users sitting at their local Starbucks (SBUX) eating sticky buns want to smear icing all over their pristine screens? And when it comes to desktop PCs, forget about it. Leaning forward to manipulate programs on a monitor won't just make it dirty, it'll add some sort of new lower-back/neck/shoulder condition to the lexicon of computer-induced pathologies that began with carpal tunnel syndrome.

As shown by the iPhone, multitouch gesture control is revolutionary when employed on a handheld device. (It works great on the MacBook Air's touchpad, too.) But on a laptop or PC screen? Perhaps, but probably not.

We'll grant that Windows 7 possesses many visual improvements (largely by copying elements that Apple pioneered.) But then Vista, the current OS, looks a lot better than its predecessor, too. Let's hope the similarities end there. The new OS is supposed to be ready by 2010. That's a good one.

After numerous delays, Vista took nearly six years to get out the door. And it is so perfectly disappointing that it actually makes Windows XP look good. It's slow. It nags users to distraction with irritating security pop-up windows. It devours RAM and graphics power. And even after more than a year, third-party driver support — the pieces of software that allow hardware to work with an OS — is still wonky.

That hasn't stopped Microsoft from selling loads of Vista to consumers, but then again they have no choice. Like it or not, it comes installed on all those PCs made by Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), Dell (DELL), Lenovo and Acer. But notice how so many corporate IT departments are avoiding an upgrade to Vista like a communicable disease.

So if history is any guide, Windows 7 will likely be both late and disappointing, if not outright lame. Then there's the little problem that Apple's next version of its incomparable OS could beat Windows 7 to market, making it look dated before it's even born. (As a consolation, Microsoft will at least have some new ideas to steal.)

To Microsoft's credit, it plays a hell of a defense. And just when the empire looks decadent and overextended we're reminded that unlike the late Romans or the Britons, Microsoft's coffers are full. It has the resources to pursue every opportunity in the industry and the scale and market share to stay vital for a long time.

But as for Windows 7, wake us when it comes out. It'll be awhile, and we'll be pleasantly surprised if it's worth the wait.

Also See:


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS ETrade
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: cerfinplnr
5 Vistas - 12 Macs (Heavy Investment /market trading /financial calculation & graphics programs ) As former Securities Broker, Branch Office Mgr. current Private Investment Fund Mgr its obviously just too hard for you late comers to the PC windows driven formats for you to have any real long term benchmarks to compare the differences. When evaluating the stolen (from a collaboration with Apple tech) in its current definitely more proficient Vista form?it looks good to you newbees. But, ignorance is bliss they say.

With over 300k in computers and software invested since 85 and our own software designed for the Professional Certified Financial Planners /Professional Investors we associate with?so much we were always able to do on Mac that could not be duplicated on the PC?s once the windows formats finally arrived for that market. Granted the differences are tighter now?but our hats still off to Apple who holds perhaps not as big a lead now? but still has the better st...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: nalla
I have 3 HPs desktops and an HP laptop with VISTA since Jan. 2008 and have NEVER had a problem. I use them for business (3) and home (1). Keep them updated and maintained. Agreed.....crypt2121!
Posted by: cerfinplnr
Crypt2121 must be an employee of Microsoft... such dedication to those Vista fiascos. But having both operating systems since 1985... MAC a windows OS (in 1985) and PC... Windows v3.1 (around 91) to 98 to XP to now a Vista--preloaded I did not upgrade it, crypt!

I realized that crypt probably never compared the Macs Windows having FIRST been on a Mac before he changed to Microsoft Windows with his PC. It still is a slower, crappier system than my old Classic Mac OS 9.2.2 and that technology is 2001.

Takes 5 -10 key strokes and waiting for things to open to do what can do on that Old Mac with one keystroke or mouse click...only difference is the mouse is faster on the PC vista with a scroll roller and mouse speeds that are advanced since the Classic was designed. EVERYTHING ELSE SLOWER. Freezes are common. And all programs here were Vista compliant... and no download and installs of wrong software.
Posted by: crypt2121
Interesting. I have three VISTA boxes at home & office, one upgrade and two pre-installed. All my boxes work fine and I have no complaints, no failures.

Further, I'm a power user and a developer, and I rarely get UAC security popups. I find that when people start complaining about UAC, they have been listening to hype and really don't have any experience themselves.

I find that most VISTA complaints come form people who upgraded machines 1) against the advice of the update advisor (no drivers), and 2) upgraded machines that were barely running XP at what would be considered a useable clip.

On the contrary, unlike the iPhone which is truely innovative, I find the Mac, nice but no great shakes. When you click on an icon the disk growns, the apps loads and presto, same 'ol same 'ol. The color scheme and controls are different, but it's really just another computer that does the same old thing basicly the same old way and approximately the same old speed.
Posted by: jgrichard
You know what? When it comes to operating systems, bigger is not better. Bigger is just stupid. I just built a system with Linux Ubuntu and it is great. It is lean, fast, secure and a pleasure to use. Just what is an operating system suppose to do? It is suppose to give you quick access to your favorite programs and then get out of the way. Every generation of Windows gets more in your face, gets slower, requires more hardware, and gets more difficult to use. Some day everyone is going to catch on, and Microsoft is going to be in big trouble.
Advertisements

Related Quotes

MSFT 29.94 Up 0.32 1.08%
AAPL 205.88 Up 5.96 2.98%
HPQ 51.02 Up 0.98 1.96%
DELL 14.79 Up 0.50 3.50%

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.