Monday November 23, 2009 2:03 AM ET
SmartMoney
Published April 8, 2008  |  A A A
Screens by Jack Hough (Author Archive)

Nvidia Rivals Steal Share Despite Efficiency

NVIDIA'S (NVDA) stock has multiplied 11 times in value since its January 1999 debut, while Microsoft (MSFT) and Intel (INTC) have lost a quarter and a third of their values, respectively, over that stretch. Such a performance makes me question the advice "buy best-of-breed." It feels comforting to own an industry leader, but not one that has so thoroughly dominated its competitors that it has nothing left to gain, and plenty to lose. Nvidia spent the bulk of the past decade beating up on its rival in the graphics-processor business, ATI. Microsoft and Intel spent it trying to figure out how to re-live the 1990s.

Now Nvidia's best growth seems behind it. In 2006 a struggling ATI was chased into the arms of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), which, like Intel, makes central processors. In recent months Nvidia's market share has eroded. In the final quarter of 2007 it captured 31.8% of graphics chip sales, a 2.1 percentage point drop from the third quarter, according to Jon Peddie Research, a market watcher. AMD's share climbed 3.7 percentage points to 22.8%. Intel's increased 3.1 points to 41.1%.

This column first highlighted Nvidia stock in March 2003 when it fetched less than $5. It peaked above $35 last October. Now it's $19 and change. Over the past six months it has underperformed Intel and the broad market by more than 30 percentage points. (AMD, lately reduced to a punching bag for Intel in its central processor business, has done worse.)

Nvidia shares at least seem comfortingly cheap, at 11 times forecast earnings for this fiscal year, which runs through January 2009. But the price reflects some grave challenges facing the company.

Had you popped open the case of a home computer a decade ago, you would have likely seen a roomy cavern populated with easily identifiable components. Upgrading your central processor, graphics processor or memory was as easy as pulling that item off the motherboard and sliding the new one on. Such upgrades were needed often; every couple of years a new program or game appeared that required more power.

Today the games are increasingly played on separate consoles, and many of the programs draw their computing power from unseen machines accessible by the Internet, so periodic power gains aren't as important. Many desktop machines have been replaced by laptops, or else by all-in-one desktop units that are built using laptop platforms. Graphics cards aren't easy to replace. In many cases they're hard-wired onto the motherboard, along with Internet connectivity components, by the same company that makes the central processor. Such integrated systems, made popular by the success of the Centrino platform introduced by Intel in 2003, carry three advantages over machines with discrete components. The parts play nice together, since they're made, or at least installed, by a single company. Systems can be made to consume far less power. They're also cheaper.

That corresponds with how most people use their computers. No one's calculating pi to the quadrillionth decimal place on their home machine, but many of us tote it into the living room with our morning coffee to read the news and send a few emails. And so the speed of processors in some of the most popular computers merely matches, or even falls short of, speeds achievable several years ago, while battery life and Internet connectivity speeds have increased sharply. This has left Nvidia with a surplus of computing power, scrambling for a more-efficient way to package it.

Let's not overstate the case. Anyone who plays games or edits video on their computer will still want the power that can only be found in a discrete chip. And Nvidia makes motherboards with integrated graphics. It just can't incorporate the central processor to make it a complete package. Also, today's mobile devices, particularly phones, want to perform graphics stunts, too, and Nvdia makes chips for these that have impressed Wall Street analysts of late. Some see phones as the company's next big source of growth. Handsets, though, made for just 2% of Nvidia's sales in its last fiscal year. And whatever the company's ability to render "Shrek" in high definition on your phone, it will be years before phone companies can deliver the download to you without tethering you to a computer.

Financial targets for Nvidia are modest. It's seen delivering single-digit profit growth this year and next. Over its past four quarters it has delivered more profit than expected, and it has done so with a relatively lean amount of factories, equipment and other costly resources. That helped earn the company a spot recently on our Efficiency Experts screen, along with seven other survivors. See our screen recipe for details on all the demands, and run the search yourself using SmartMoney's stock screener.

Jack Hough is an associate editor at SmartMoney.com and author of "Your Next Great Stock."

Try our powerful Select Stock Screener to discover investment opportunities that meet your criteria.


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: grcacc
anhe64 - I've been to Tom's Hardware today and sad to say, AMD does not own the market. They do have capable GPU's at all price points. Per the last review I read, they also appear to be trying to start a price war, which indicates they are having problems. Meanwhile, NVDA seems to be gushing cash.

The sad fact is, no gamer I know prefers AMD over NVDA. They ALL prefer NVDA as they are easier to install and use on their systems.

That's all I have to say, about that.
Posted by: stocksresearcher
I would appreciate unbiased comments or you have lots to learn on this field. Intel is playing catch up with ATI and Nvidia when it comes to graphics chips. Intel's integrated graphics does a diservice to anyone who buys a portable computer or a desktop PC without a real video card. Do your self a favor and get an ATI or Nvidia video card with your next laptop or desktop purchase. You can even upgrade your desktop PC with a video card and chances are you will see such a performance boost you may realize you do not need a new PC. I know, my AMD Sempron system got a new life with a new Nvidia graphics card.
Posted by: anhe64
Surprises? the 2500 chip may become a must have for iphone killers (unless apple will use it too). Skeletons? check the message board of nvidia at yahoo. those posting here have been searching and searching for any bad news but nothing has shown up yet. Worse case something shows up but with all nonsense (like in this article) floating around, stock price has been suppressed already enough for 10 skeletons , none of which has been materialized yet.

Recession? a big chunk of sales comes from outside the US. What's more, graphics cards sell at a significant premium in Europe thanks to the higher euro. Good for the bottom line. bad for European buyers (unless they come to the US to buy), Good for nvidia's bottom line.
Posted by: anhe64
Consoles take market share? We just saw Blue Ray win from HD. Sony's PS3 contains Nvidia and is a bargain since it also can be used as Blue Ray player (who separately are even more expensive). Or plug in a newer graphics card of nvidia for $150 with a $150 blue ray DVD player and your old computer is the perfect machine to hook up to your big screen tv.

AMD just announced 10% layoffs. Nvidia is currently hiring (as they announced on their last CC). Go to their website and the hiring page. It showed 404 openings or almost 10% of the workforce. They just bought more space in San Jose because, well, they are sitting on too much cash and more keeps on coming (and not like AMD who is big time in the red). Sounds to me as a pretty bullish signal.

Posted by: anhe64
regarding AMD's market share: go to tomshardware.com for the price/graphics card line up. With the latest 9800x2, 9800gtx they now own the whole price stack.

Now that is something that I would call market gain. Not market loss to competition.

Also:

'Graphics cards aren't easy to replace'??

of all things, these are actually the easiest. True, some computers have graphics integrated on the Motherboard but you can still plug another graphics card in it so your PC can handle another more demanding game. Too bad for Intel and AMD that this would increase the lifetime of PC's but thanks to Nvidia consumers can delay the bigger purchase a bit longer
Advertisements

Related Quotes

NVDA 12.90 Down -0.08 -0.62%
GES 36.50 Down -0.41 -1.11%
CRDN 16.45 Up 0.03 0.18%
 

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.