Monday November 23, 2009 9:37 AM ET
SmartMoney
Published April 7, 2008  |  A A A
Tradecraft by Jonathan Hoenig (Author Archive)

Selling Losers as They Rally Is Big Mistake

AS MUCH AS WE try, we aren't always correct in our analysis of where the markets might be headed. Witness the dramatic drops in stocks like Google (GOOG) or Apple (AAPL) in the first quarter. Many names that looked like easy money last fall were sucking wind by winter.

As regular readers know, it's my belief that portfolio management has a much bigger impact on the bottom line than simple stock picking. One of the worst and most commonly practiced offenses is the sin of waiting for XYZ, held at a loss, to get "back to even" before finally getting out.

You know the deal: You buy XYZ at $50 a share and, for whatever reason, it proceeds to drop. Believing that a paper loss isn't a real loss, you hold on even as the stock continues to slide and the fundamentals falter. The lower it falls, the more you dig in your heels, ready to take the stock to the grave rather than admit defeat. Who says trading isn't emotional?

I've often written about the importance of taking investment cues from objective reality; that is, the price action of the securities themselves. But holding on to large losing positions is, almost by definition, the essence of fighting the tape. If I'm down 20% in shares of XYZ, then it's my judgment that's off, not the market's. The market is never wrong. Investors, even the talented ones, are wrong all the time.

The problem is compounded when people resolve to "sell when I get to even." In other words they wait to exit a laggard trade once it has recouped the majority of the losses or shows a slight gain. Even if we've held XYZ for two years while shares dropped 40%, we sell once the loss has become a slight gain, relieved to finally exit the trade and make a small profit.

In the midst of a fast market when the money is flying, it's often easy to be led by your gut instead of your head. But by removing ourselves from the moment, we can see why, on average, waiting to sell "when you get back to even" is exactly the wrong approach.

The reality is losing trades are unproductive uses of capital, and that the time value of money is significantly more important than the ego hit of having to take a loss. The sooner you can cut your mistakes, the quicker precious resources can be focused on more promising ideas. The best traders aren't those who never have losses, but those who are comfortable with admitting their mistakes and quickly moving on to better opportunities.

But the real rub comes when the stock finally does rally back to the level at which you originally thought XYZ was such a steal. Having sat on dead money for so long, you quickly look to sell shares as soon as you're "even."

Yet you liked XYZ at $50. If it has dropped to $25 and has been able to over time march all the way back to $50, that's exactly the wrong time to consider selling it. After all, the stock is now poised to make the move you originally foresaw. But because you're emotionally weakened after having nursed a loss for so long, you want nothing more to do than to protect your ego and get out.

Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) presents a contemporary example. After years of stagnant stock performance, the retailing giant's stock has enjoyed a strong first quarter, rising to a three-year high even as the rest of the market wilted. Many investors, underwater for several years, are no doubt taking advantage of the higher prices to finally exit positions originally taken earlier this decade.

Wal-Mart Stores vs. the S&P 500 year-to-date.

Yet what matters isn't how a stock acted six years ago, but how it's acting in the here and now. If you've dragged Wal-Mart around all this time and are finally starting to see a return, then I'd suggest now might be the moment to add to the position rather than rush to trade it away.

Because trading is emotional, we have a tendency to personalize every tick. Yet the stock doesn't "know" you bought it at $50. Every day thousands of other people are making value judgments that are independent of your own choice to buy XYZ.

So the fact you bought XYZ at higher prices shouldn't negate the importance of getting out once the name has moved against you. And if you do insist on dragging around losing trades like old laundry, don't make the mistake of selling them once the stock has finally regained your original price. More often than you'd think, that's not the end of the trade but the beginning of the bull move you anticipated all along.

Jonathan Hoenig is managing member at Capitalistpig Hedge Fund LLC.


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: LasOlas
Jonathan yet again makes a great point. Most traders have absolutely no plan to 'objectively manage' their trades once they get into them. Are they going to risk 10%, 20%, 37.82%----what? Listen to Jonathan!!!!!!! While he's not going to take you 'by the hand' and lead you through the investment maze----he is THE ABSOLUTE BEST of anyone on TV or in PRINT for investment advice.
Posted by: duped_again
Sounds like Hoenig owns a couple bucket-fulls of Walmart and is churning the stock.
Posted by: bebgsurg
I don't know. I sold Walmart a few months ago and now wish I didn't. If I had held onto my loser in this case I would be happier now. All this talk about selling the losers sometimes strikes me as not right. You have to take the loss and may regret it.
Posted by: fxtrader07
that's why 98% of the people fail in trading, ultimately.
however, the cure is not trying to get better in bad trading but to stop this approach and start to INVEST! empirical evidence has shown that patient, focussed, disciplined(!), low-turnover(!) investing has produced superior results (consitsently beats the market over the long term).
I know, most people do enjoy trading (for a while at least) and they love the action. in fact most trade because of that - though they usually are unaware of it or slow to admit. ironically these are the very opportunity creators for patient value-oriented investors. so keep it up - but remember, it may likely kill your wealth and your health
Posted by: bstauffe
You must have read my mind! I was recently thinking of selling the WMT shares I bought at $53 a few years ago and held onto through that period of negative returns. I'm reassessing as if I were buying today in order to decide how long to hold it--or whether to buy some more.
Advertisements

Related Quotes

WMT 54.28 - 0.00 0.00%