Saturday March 20, 2010 6:56 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published March 3, 2008  |  A A A
Tradecraft by Jonathan Hoenig (Author Archive)

Stock Trends Apparent to Traders Who Stop to Look

IN THIS GAME, it's frighteningly easy to lose tremendous amounts of money literally overnight. Case in point is Evan Dooley, the MF Global (MF) broker who, for reasons still unknown, was motivated to wake up in the middle of the night and sell 15,000 wheat contracts short (the equivalent of 75 million bushels) with nary a sliver of that equity in his account. The brokerage exited his trade hours later, losing a cool $141 million in the process. From a Midwestern nobody to international rogue trader in a few hours flat.

The stock of MF Global, which had been relatively strong in a weak market, promptly dropped 40% to an all-time low over the next two days. It's the stuff trading nightmares are made of.

Thankfully, most changes, both in life and in the markets, don't occur that quickly. Adjustments tend to unfold slowly over time, oftentimes so gradually that you don't even realize they've occurred until after the fact.

The best example can be found in the natural changing of the seasons. It's still quite cold here in Chicago in March, but without much difficulty, one can easily observe the days getting longer, the air getting warmer and the snow beginning to melt. Yes, there will be one particular day in which spring will officially "arrive," but ahead of that day there were plenty of clues and fair warning.

Right now, the commodities story and increasingly the weak-dollar story have become front-page news all over the world as those markets have continued to boom. And as millions of investors salivate over the performances by securities such as StreetTracks Gold (GLD), PowerShares DB Agriculture (DBA) and CurrencyShares Euro Trust (FXE), it's worth noting that these picks didn't get hot overnight. Gold, oil and weak-dollar plays have been in bull markets for years. Although that may or may not be the case a few months from now, at the moment the trend is very much intact.

You can't say the same thing about utilities, a former favorite. Names like Great Plains (GXP), Consolidated Edison (ED), Exelon (EXC), Wisconsin Energy (WEC), FirstEnergy (FE) and Edison International (EIX) have slowly become among the market's worst names.

The investment game is especially competitive and efficient. To that end, there's an ongoing process of natural selection. Losing investments — and investors — simply get washed away.

We've seen that over the years with former highfliers like Alberto Vilar or Garrett Van Wagoner, or more recently with rogue traders Jerome Kerviel and the aforementioned Dooley. Indeed, if you've got bad discipline or a reckless approach, you simply won't last long.

But it's also true in investment themes as well, where only the strong tend to survive. Far too often a quest for a "bargain" leads to stocks the market is naturally trying to brush aside.

Case in point is newspaper stocks, among the weakest in a tremendously weak market. Newspapers have been lousy stocks for years, participating in a steady, sectorwide implosion. Yet many investors, especially those with a value bent, have bought the whole way down, ignoring a litany of indicators, most obviously the stocks themselves.

1
2
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
cgm205

111 Comments
Funny how today,03/04/08, when you look at the paragraph regarding utilities, all one sees is a sea of green.
Posted by: dunk01
The guy (Hoenig) is not a master of the literary craft, and he certainly said nothing of note in the article...'And while I'm cognizant of the fact that, as pointed out last week, yesterday's hot stocks can quickly cool off, the shift tends to unfold over months. So when the time comes to put money to work, you're usually best served by buying the wheat and kicking the chaff aside.'

Well, duh!!!

Posted by: minuette
yes, meant that is *is* zero sum.

Dennis Gartman said it best a few days ago:

'..We find it interesting that the media is
reporting that MF Global has lost $141 million, but that no
reports are being made that someone or some entity
made that same sum of money!. We must always
remember that the futures markets are sum-zero games,
and that what one side loses, the other side wins. Yes,
MF Global lost $141 million, but that same sum of money
is lining the pockets of a lot of other people. That's the
side of the story that never gets reported... and which
should be..'
Posted by: dave583
I think Smartmoney should outsource Jonathans column to a chinese analyst for 1/10 what they are paying him. Now thats FAIR trade. :thumbs up:
Posted by: gieosse
minuette,

I think you meant to say, they are zero sum. All derivatives are. Basically derivatives are betting, and the money is distributed to the winners from the losers minus the house cut. Same principle as poker.
Advertisements
 
Retrieving data...

Related Quotes

MF 7.06 Down -0.25 -3.42%
GLD 108.28 Down -2.06 -1.87%
DBA 24.79 Down -0.12 -0.48%
FXE 135.06 Down -0.74 -0.54%

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.