Saturday July 4, 2009 5:19 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published February 26, 2008  |  A A A
Common Sense by James B. Stewart (Author Archive)

The Troubles of Auction Rate Preferred Shares

THEY WERE SOLD as a liquid, safe, slightly higher-yielding, tax-exempt alternative to money-market funds. I should know, since I bought some.

For several years I've been parking a good part of my cash in Auction Rate Preferred Shares (ARPS). These are typically shares of a closed-end fund that used the proceeds to buy triple-A-rated securities. (In my case, municipal bonds.) There was virtually no interest rate risk since the rate was set at frequent auctions of the shares. My shares were issued by BlackRock (BLK), the asset-management firm almost half-owned by Merrill Lynch (MER); many other firms also sold the securities. When I needed cash, I simply redeemed shares, as I did last month when I took advantage of the market downturn to buy stocks.

Last week, when I read that some tax-exempt entities, even the Metropolitan Museum of Art, were suddenly paying exorbitant rates because of "failed" auctions for municipal bonds, I didn't immediately suspect this would have any immediate impact on me. I heard nothing from Merrill Lynch, which sold me the ARPS. My account statement continues to show the shares at full face value.

I became more concerned as news reports of "failed" auctions continued last week. Finally, I called a broker to ask about the status of my ARPS. I learned that recent auctions of these preferred shares have indeed failed, which means there were no buyers at rates acceptable to the sellers. The market has virtually collapsed. There is no guarantee the shares can be sold. Indeed, it's highly unlikely they can be. What was a ready source of cash is now essentially frozen.

Last year, when some money-market funds turned out to hold some mortgage-backed securities and faced a liquidity crisis, their sponsors stepped in and redeemed the shares at face value. This seemed the only decent course, not to mention a good long-term investment in customer loyalty.

But when I asked a broker at Merrill Lynch if it would do the same for owners of these money-market equivalents, the answer was "no" — not after the multibillion-dollar write-offs Merrill has already taken on illiquid assets. Merrill Lynch and the other big banks which sold these shares have stopped making a market in them, which is a major reason the auctions have failed.

Merrill Lynch, when asked for comment, told me: "We are offering our clients loans which can give them liquidity." It wasn't yet clear whether these would be interest-free loans, which they certainly should be, in my opinion.

BlackRock commented on its web site that, "We do not see any issues with the financial health or fundamentals of these funds as a result of the failed auctions." The firm also stated online that it "continues to closely monitor developments in the ARPS market."

The amount of auction rate preferred shares outstanding is massive — an estimated $330 billion. Many firms besides Merrill Lynch sold the shares. I suspect that many investors own these and still don't realize the predicament they're in. Fortunately, I have no immediate need for the cash. But given that these securities were marketed as money-market alternatives, I'm sure that there are plenty of people who do, and will be in for a rude shock when they try to redeem them.

I hope that this will be a temporary paralysis and the market will come to its senses. The auctions have been going on for 20 years without incident. These securities still carry a triple-A rating. None of the underlying bonds have defaulted. Interest is still being paid, at a slightly higher rate than before.

In my view, any failure of the big banks to honor what is at least a moral commitment to the people to whom they sold these shares, as well as any failure to notify them, keep them informed, and work out solutions for people facing hardship, is appalling. At least two states are investigating and I would expect them to be joined by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

So the credit crisis has struck again, this time in what I thought was the safest corner of my portfolio. Is any fixed-income security short of U.S. Treasurys and the biggest, most liquid money-market funds safe at this point? I'd like to think so, but this experience has left me shaken. I don't want to contribute to the irrational panic that seems to have swept the debt markets. But if you own any securities that depend on investor confidence or raise any liquidity issues, be aware of the risks.

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More:
Facebook
Twitter
Find More Articles About: debt, Stocks
User Comments
Posted by: merrill-injustice

I'm also stuck with a bunch of Blackrock auction rate securities. Worst thing is I have $175,000 of them that Merrill put in my account and I never authorized or knew about it until it was too late. My broker purchased them without my authority, and worse, he talked to me a half dozens times on the phone and never said anything about them to me. Check out www.merrill-injustice.org and sign my blogs. Also, if you want to sell your ARS there is a few places buying for discounts. www.restrictedstockpartners.com is buying.

Posted by: HarryNewton

I have money stuck in auction rate preferrreds.
I am one of many.
I have started a blog on auction rate preferreds to keep us all informed.
My blog includes everything on ARPs -- from published articles to advice, law suits and hardship stories.
My blog is www.AuctionRatePreferreds.org
You are welcome to visit it.
Harry Newton

Posted by: baldpopsicle2222

baldpopsicle2222-

my advisor bought my a AMP early January and at first I was pretty ticked off at him, still am to a degree. but now, I think there's some good incentive to purchase these...the liquidity sucks, but I dont need the money he used to buy it. And i'm getting really good interest from it, the way i calculated it, even if i never get my money from principal, i'll make my money back faster because of the higher interest it now pays, i think my advisor called it duration or something....what do you all think?

Posted by: pat19b

We were entrapped by the collision of the Major brokers. Merrill put out a research report on 2/08/08 by John Conary called 'Back to basics' which clearly recommends the ARP as ultra sound and liquid. And then the brokers, including his, stepped away on the same day. I thought collision is illegal. Where are the authorizes. GO fish.. I guess the Brokers are putting there hope and money onto Bush for a good old Judge fixing like the last few screwing's the investing got from this administration. John Thain is on the board of Blackrock. I Wonder if he's demanding Blackrock refinances or he's on the phone with the white house for a good judge.

Posted by: CasualReader

I looked at the some of the exchange traded floating rate preferred prices and yes, it does look ugly.

However, I don't think they are direct comparables. They are single issuer (no backing other than the continued health of the co.) vs ARPS , debt issued by a fund backed by over 200% in diversified collateral. Should the underlying deteriorate, then some ARPS must be refunded by selling that collateral, and maintaining the 200% coverage ratio. If Merrill hits the skids, its all over for that preferred stock. Huge difference in principal risk here.

The only advantage to the exchange traded paper is the ability to sell on the open market. I may be talking my book but I would not expect huge discounts to appear , unless folks are so panicked and desperate they will take any price.

Advertisements

Related Quotes

BLK 167.65 Down -5.20 -3.01%
 

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.