Sunday November 8, 2009 9:48 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published January 7, 2008  |  A A A
Tradecraft by Jonathan Hoenig (Author Archive)

Two Currency Plays for a Homely Market

MANY INVESTORS, ESPECIALLY the value crowd, go looking for the weakest, worst-performing investments they can find with the notion that, if they hang on long enough, one day the laggards will come back in favor. The only trouble is that you never know how long that turnaround will take. It could be months. It could be years. And in certain cases, it could be a lifetime... or never.

I find investment ideas by opening my eyes. I look at a ton of stocks. I look at indexes, ETFs, futures contracts and mutual funds. And, by and large, I look for ideas that are doing well. After all, if an investment is going to perform for the "long haul", it should start by performing in the here and now.

This is an industry that runs on bright new ideas. That's made the dearth of plausible buying opportunities over the last few weeks that much more striking.

There are some notable exceptions: State Street (STT), for example, among financial stocks, and Becton Dickinson (BDX) in the health-care space stand out as unusually strong. But right now, it's a low-probability environment for equities.

What does "low probability" mean? Consider that you probably wouldn't go to the ugly girl contest to try and find the one pretty girl. You might have more luck at a beauty pageant. So I don't dig through a pile of weak stocks looking for the one that isn't homely. I'd rather wait for the entire asset class to improve its performance.

And while stocks might have stalled, if you've so much as glanced at the business section lately you probably know that other asset classes — commodities, Treasurys and foreign exchange — have been much stronger.

And while I believe that you should follow the tape instead of fighting it, it's possible to take this too far. For example, some gold investors are gradually overcome by a quiet mania that festers and grows until a portfolio has much too much of the yellow metal.

When not much else is moving, this type of concentration can be tempting. In fact, the same dogmatic portfolio overload has also occurred with foreign stocks and energy, just as it did with technology back in the 1990s. The lesson isn't to avoid hot areas but rather not to let a position in XYZ become your only position...even if the only other alternative is cash.

In that spirit, I've lately been intrigued by a pair of off-the-radar structured currency products traded on the American Stock Exchange. Both offer upside exposure to baskets of exotic currencies along with a limited downside — essentially a call option packaged into single security form. The weakening U.S. dollar has received a lot of play since I wrote about this trend a few years ago. But against the Asian currencies in particular it likely hasn't seen its lows just yet.

CAQ and GBO, 6-month charts
Source: BigCharts.com

Citigroup Global Markets Group of Asian Currencies (CAQ) is a principal-protected note whose return is based on the performance of the South Korean won, Thai baht, Indian rupee, Taiwanese dollar and the Australian dollar. As these currencies rise (or fall) against the dollar, so does the price of CAQ. The major benefit of using the structured product over simply trading the currencies in the spot market is that at maturity, the note, now trading at $10.72, is protected to pay out at least $10 per share. So your downside is limited. One caveat is that the note comes due on April 28, 2008, meaning this particular security only has a few more months left before it matures. The full prospectus can be found here.

Merrill Lynch offers a similar security in the Principal Protected Global Currency Basket (GBO), which is based on a currency basket in which the Korean won, the Russian ruble, the Singapore dollar and the Chinese yuan each constitute 25%. This note too is principal-protected at $10 per share, meaning that even if the currencies plummet you'll be assured no less than $10 at expiration, which is Feb. 9, 2009. Interested investors should delve into the product's prospectus for more details.

Jonathan Hoenig is managing member at Capitalistpig Hedge Fund LLC. At the time of writing, Hoenig's fund held positions in many of the securities mentioned.

Find More Articles About: Stocks, Investing
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
Bookmark and Share RSS
User Comments
Posted by: sorrynowaynohow


For a more academic rebuke of DCA:


- George M. Constantinides. 'A Note on the Suboptimality of Dollar-Cost Averaging as an Investment Policy.' Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. XIV, June 1979, pp. 443?50.

- Kirt C. Butler and Dale L. Domian. 'Risk, Diversification, and the Investment Horizon.' Journal of Portfolio Management. Spring 1991, pp. 41?47.

- Richard E. Williams and Peter W. Bacon. 'Lump Sum Beats Dollar-Cost Averaging.' Journal of Financial Planning. Volume 6, Number 2, April 1993, pp. ?
Posted by: sorrynowaynohow
If you are talking about true DCA, where you have 12,000 in cash right now and invest $1000 per month then you most assuredly will lose return vis-a-vis the lump sum investor of $12000.

If you do not believe me, I have a structured product I think you might be interested in . . .
Posted by: sorrynowaynohow
If you are referring to monthly investing, well isn't that really a form of lump sum investment? If you can afford to put 10% of your paycheck for 401(k) contribution and then DO put 10% to work in your 401(k) you are investing a lump sum.

If your contribution is lumpy, say, 20%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 0%; then you should make corresponding contributions immediately rather than smoothing contributions to reflect 10% per month.
Posted by: sorrynowaynohow
Lump sum investing beats DCA nearly 2:1 over 10 year holding periods since 1925.
More specifically, dollar cost averaging outperforms lump sum investing only in times of a sideways or declining market that then breaks upward. You buy low, lower, lowest and then bang up.

If you believe that the market, in general, rises over time, then do you want to buy all at once and ride the volatility (certain options strategies can safely juice your portfolio as well!) or do you want to purchase fewer shares at an ever increasing price?
Posted by: hcarba
As an added comment, I was lucky and started developing a strong cash position a little before the subprime fiasco hit, but there was another opportunity to get into a cash position after this fiasco, between November and Mid December 2007. If you cash out right now, you run a much higher risk of losing even more money than you already have. Use dollar cost averaging (investing with every paycheck). Select the strongest growing companies in their field. Risk becomes compounded in these times as market fear psychology and paranoia become electric, so keep risk balanced in your portfolio. Look for undervalued growth jewels. If we slide into a recession oil and gold can also get dragged down at some point. If it is a stagflation recession, then keep some money in oil and gold.
Advertisements

Related Quotes

STT 41.45 Down -1.36 -3.18%
BDX 70.54 Up 1.69 2.45%

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.