Sunday November 22, 2009 10:20 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published December 16, 2008  |  A A A
SmartMoney Magazine by Neil Parmar (Author Archive)

The Best Colleges for Making Money

Is an Ivy League education worth the money?

The debate over the long-term value of a pricey private-school education is heating up, especially in this tough economy. Sure, everyone knows that by sticker price alone, public schools are a sweet deal, with out-of-state tuition and fees that run about 30 percent less than most of their private rivals—and in-state fees running up to three-quarters less.

Indeed, the math is pretty jarring; the difference, on average, ranges between $7,700 and $18,600 a year, obviously no small matter with stock market woes depleting so many people's savings. But in the back of everybody's mind, there's that nagging question: Is the extra money worth it?

To their credit, elite private schools do boast lower student-to-faculty ratios, fat endowments and name-brand cachet that, along with their active alumni networks, have long provided entrée into the upper echelons of the working world.

But if long-term career and salary are what matters—and what else should, especially in today's economy?—then a growing chorus of private-school critics point out that the public-school scenario may actually deliver a far better bang for your buck.

The SmartMoney Rankings

In a new twist on traditional college rankings, SmartMoney took a crack at quantifying the long-term value of a college education. Our goal was to spotlight the relationship between tuition costs and graduates' earning power. Working with consultant PayScale.com, which recently published a groundbreaking survey on alumni salaries, we first looked at what graduates from 50 of the most expensive four-year colleges earn in their early and midcareers. Then we factored in their up-front tuition and fees. The result? A unique "payback" ratio for each school.

In the end, our scorecard may be music to the ears of many state-school admissions deans—not to mention a lot of struggling parents. After all, who would've guessed that Texas A & M, No. 1 in our survey, would deliver a payback more than two and a half times that of Harvard? Or that the state universities of Delaware and Rhode Island would beat out every Ivy in the ranking?

Indeed, those unheralded public universities turn out to be a far better deal than virtually all the privates we surveyed. The Ivies in general? They deliver nowhere near the payback on tuition that most parents staring at a six-figure bill over four years might expect.

Return on Tuition Investment

Ultimately, we weren't trying to measure the quality of education or colleges' selectivity. Other rankings take ample care of that, and dedicated students will thrive at any of these fine schools. But with boutique private colleges coming under heavy criticism for spiraling costs, our payback numbers certainly raise questions about the actual "return" on an educational investment. For parents fretting about sending their kid to the University of Washington versus, say, Columbia or Brown, they can rest easier knowing that Husky alums recoup their tuition costs, on average, twice as fast as grads from those two Ivies.

Of course, rating colleges is not an exact science, and our methods did get their share of criticism from the private-school sector. At Carleton College, a small liberal arts school in Minnesota that normally ranks very high in college surveys—but only 39th in ours—Dean of Admissions Paul Thiboutot says we underestimated their alums' average salaries by including only those who stopped at a bachelor's degree. "The real earning power is what they end up doing in professional and graduate school," he says.

Other private schools, including the Ivies, say that many of their students pay less than the full sticker price we used for tuition, because of grants and scholarships. (True, but public schools also discount their tuition, especially for in-state students.)

Then there are the schools that argue that payback surveys miss the whole point, since you should enter their hallowed halls to enrich your mind, expand your cultural IQ and improve your critical thinking. (Why else would anyone suffer through Descartes, Dostoyevsky and differential equations?) Caesar Storlazzi, Yale's director of student financial services, for one, points to his school's world-class faculty, libraries and art collections. "Put this all together and the experience is without compare," he says.

SmartMoney.com would like to invite you to visit our Variable Annuities Custom Resource Center.
Click here to find out more about this financial product and how it may apply to you.

1
2
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: xqbarr
This is a poor metric (for multiple reasons) to judge an educational institution. It seems this is more of an headliner grabber than a serious investigation - if smartmoney can make this flawed of an analysis it certainly might reflect on the credibility of other articles! TWS123 got it right that 'total net income' is what you are after if the dollar is of the utmost importance and in that case the ivy league pulls substantially ahead. Of course the highest ROI would go to the 'student' who never attends college.
Posted by: aryanium
TO: blny07

You said: "PS I have no affiliation with URI, but your comments on that were just mean, nasty and not educational. What's wrong with you ?"

Are you ok?! My comment was neither a response nor had anything with you and your comment but just my personal feedback to this article which I had seen once at my university home page!

I guess there is something wrong with you when you label my comment as nasty(as if I was insulting someone or something), mean( ...!!!) and not educational(...!!!)?! You dont have to act like an illiterate loser!

Undergraduate degree is nothing more than elementary schools for kids... if you personally believe, four years of general courses in science at those schools would make that much of a difference, you're free to choose but not me who already got a BS degree taking his 2nd and 3rd in a different field knowing whats going on.

Here is a link leading to the MIT Open Source Wares providing some instructor'...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: blny07
Also, money2u, true and valid the story certainly is, but my comment was the article was ridiculous as it is not worth your subscrIption $ to buy a magazine where 99.9% of the readers will not get accepted to the very schools they say are not worth the money.
How about writing on topics of more interest to the average reader than the few lucky ones who get into these schools ?

PS I have no affiliation with URI, but your comments on that were just mean, nasty and not educational. What's wrong with you ?
Posted by: blny07
Sounds to me like money2u can't read.
I said that while there are some advantages to the Ivy League schools, I "didn't think it's worth it".
So why do you conclude I went there ? You sure didn't !
Posted by: aryanium
I as a serious student, used to believe on the extreme value behind the ivy league universities but later, after comparing the state university tuition with such school, I mysef realized paying 30,000 instead of 7000 a year wont definitely be worth for dragging just a school name in my degree... I cannot believe the quality of education could be that much different even.

I am at URI and very happy with their engineerign programs and I believe I can invest less and get more education even! I am thinking of two master degree in Engineering there or perhaps the 2nd in another state one like UMASS! No way paying 30,000 for Harvard or MIT or Brown... No way is worth it to me.

I already have been getting education thru the instructors educated from such ivy league colleges like MIT!

And bu the way! Your quality of education depends on your scientific performance reflecting in some parts in your grades and your own personal scientific contribution to the society th...(Read more of this comment)
Advertisements