Sunday November 22, 2009 8:09 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published November 12, 2009  |  A A A
Consumer Action by Aleksandra Todorova (Author Archive)

New Fed Rules Limit Debit Card Overdrafts

Are the days of the pesky overdraft fee drawing to a close? The Federal Reserve announced new rules Thursday that would restrict banks’ ability to charge fees on debit card transactions that would result in a negative balance.

The rules were not designed to bail out habitual check-bouncers. Rather, they were created to curb fees on everyday purchases – say, an ill-timed cup of coffee at Starbucks (SBUX) that ends up costing $38 (or three in one day that end up costing more than $100). “Because of these costs, consumer advocates contend that most consumers would prefer that their bank decline ATM or debit card transactions if the transactions would overdraw their account,” the Fed wrote.

But unless legislation currently making its way through Congress becomes law, consumers may be stuck paying for their mistakes. Without a law, overdraft fees – which average $34, according to the Center for Responsible Lending -- will continues to pop up on bank statements and put consumers in a cycle of debt, says Ed Mierzwinski, the consumer program director for the consumer advocacy U.S. Public Interest Research Groups.

The new Fed rules, which go into effect July 1, 2010, would prohibit banks from charging overdraft fees on A.T.M. withdrawals or purchases made using debit cards, unless customers opt into their overdraft protection programs.

Currently, the majority of banks (75%, according to a study of these programs by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) enroll their customers automatically and give them the option to opt out. In 2008, banks and credit unions collected nearly $24 billion in overdraft fees, according to the Center for Responsible Lending, a 35% increase compared with 2006.

But the Fed’s rules come too little too late, Mierzwinski says. The heat to address overdraft fees is already on the banking industry. Last month, Sen. Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.), who is the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, introduced legislation that would require banks to implement an opt-in rule for overdraft programs and prohibit banks from manipulating the order in which they post transactions. Similar legislation has been introduced to the House of Representatives by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D., N.Y.).

Bank of America (BAC) and JP Morgan Chase (JPM) announced changes to their overdraft programs in September, which included an opt-in requirement and limiting the number of overdraft fees charged each day. (Click here to read more about these changes.)

The Fed rules will make some of those changes a requirement for all banks, but they do not offer most of the other consumer protections embedded in the Dodd and Maloney’s proposed legislation.

Here’s what consumer protections the Fed rules introduce, and where they come up short:

1. Opt-in approach for ATM and debit-card transactions…
Banks will be required to provide new and existing customers with the right to opt in to the institution’s overdraft service for ATM and one-time debit-card transactions.

2. … but no such requirements for checks and recurring electronic payments
The assumption here is that because consumers typically pay by check when making larger purchases, they should be better able to plan these purchases and avoid overdraft fees, Mierzwinski says. Likewise for so-called ACH transactions, such as the automatic electronic payment of utility or other monthly bills set up by the consumer.

3. All customers must be treated equally
Banks are prohibited from offering better terms of service (say, accounts with lower fees or the same fees but more bells and whistles) for customers who opt in to their overdraft programs. So if the bank has a $30 overdraft fee for checks, it cannot offer a $20 fee for its opt-in customers only.

4. Banks cannot decline payment of checks or ACH transactions that overdraw accounts
So even if you do not opt into the bank’s overdraft protection program, you will still be hit with an overdraft fee if a check or ACH payment causes an overdraft.

5. No action on debit-hold concerns
When a merchant places a hold on funds in a consumer’s checking account (a common scenario for those using their debit cards to book car rentals, hotel rooms or even pay at the gas station), that debit hold may cause an overdraft on the consumer’s account. But the Fed rules have not adopted the proposed provisions on debit holds, which would obligate financial institutions to address such concerns. According to the final rules document, “the Board believes that a more comprehensive approach that involves financial institutions, card networks, and merchants may be required to effectively address these problems. The Board will continue to monitor developments with respect to debit holds and assess whether to take further action.”

6. No limit on the number of overdraft fees
The bills introduced by Dodd and Maloney would limit the number of overdraft coverage fees banks can charge to one per month and six per year. The Fed rules do not address that issue.

SmartMoney.com would like to invite you to visit our Variable Annuities Custom Resource Center.
Click here to find out more about this financial product and how it may apply to you.


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
stanton.erin

2 Comments
So I actually just went through the whole overdraft issue with Chase. They took longer than expected to post a deposit, and as a result my account when in the red. Instead of posting transactions in the order the occurred, they reordered 5 days worth of transactions to benefit them self.
Outraged that a bank was allowed to do this, I actually took them to Small Claims court and WON!!! I just received a phone call from a woman in their legal department informing me that the ONLY reason I won was because they didn't show up and thus defaulted. They had every opportunity to arrive (it was scheduled 6 weeks in advance) and didn't. They also can not assume that they would automatically win the case.
Chase is an example of a bank that says they focus on customer service while in the background, tries to come up with ways to extract more fees from their customers. I plan to close my account as soon as possible.

Posted by: BuyerAdvocate
The banks though I don't think are going to just sit by and see all this money go out the window without any response. They are all about their bottom line and are now going to have to make up this lost revenue somehow. What we can expect from them is now they will start charging for other services such as simply having a checking account.

The people that manage their accounts well and never come close to having an overdraft charge are the ones that are going to suffer. These people are the ones that are going to pay the price for the seemingly less responsible people. Isn't that how it works with everything in this world though? Why should this be any different? The people that do things the right way often seem to have to pay the price for those that can't manage themselves. Its not entirely those people's fault either. Its also the banks fault for getting too greedy with the overdraft system. They saw a great source of profit, and exploited it to the extent that something h...(Read more of this comment)
BackType
Comments From Around the Web
Posted by: JasonManiecki on Twitter

PSA: New Rules Take Effect 7/1/2010 http://bit.ly/IeOoM

Posted by: consumerfinance on Twitter

RT @Aleks_Todorova: My take on the Fed overdraft rules (they're not nearly good enough) http://bit.ly/olp0i

Posted by: Aleks_Todorova on Twitter

My take on the Fed overdraft rules (they're not nearly good enough) http://bit.ly/olp0i

Advertisements

Related Quotes

SBUX 21.41 Down -0.12 -0.56%
BAC 16.09 Up 0.01 0.06%
JPM 42.46 Down -0.09 -0.21%
 

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.