Friday November 20, 2009 8:10 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published September 8, 2009  |  A A A
Consumer Action by Sarah Morgan (Author Archive)

Thirtysomething and Strapped: What to Do?

Is 30 the new 20? Or the new 16?

A new survey of young workers published by the AFL-CIO suggests many Americans under 35 can’t manage the basic financial building blocks of an adult life. The union calls the last ten years a “lost decade” for these young people during which many fell short on critical responsibilities like getting their own place, finding a stable job with benefits and saving money for emergencies.

About 31% of survey respondents said they made enough money to pay their bills and set some money aside, and seven out of 10 respondents said they did not have enough money saved to cover two months’ worth of living expenses. Parents of these young workers know how far they are from making it on their own; one in three is living at home.

“Along almost every metric, people under 35 are doing much worse than they were 10 years ago,” says Jennifer Jannon, 29, a regional director for Working America, the ALF-CIO’s community organization for non-union workers. “People are literally putting off starting their adult lives because of the conditions they’re facing economically,” Jannon says.

She says the results should not be interpreted as laziness. “Young people are really yearning to move out on their own [and] to start their adult lives,” she says. “[But], they can’t find the type of work that supports an adult life.”

Some take issue with the suggestion that the current job market is more difficult for young workers than for their counterparts over 35. “It’s easier for younger people because they have less experience, and they don’t cost as much,” says Robin Ryan, a career counselor and the author of “60 Seconds And You’re Hired.” “If you’re over 40, a lot of employers see you as expensive,” Ryan says. Employers may also assume younger workers are more tech-savvy and can more quickly adapt to a changing workplace, she says.

Regardless of who’s to blame, the result for young workers will be a substantial loss of potential wealth over their lifetimes. A person who’s able to save $2,000 a year between ages 22 and 30 will retire with more money than a person who saves the same amount over a longer period from ages 30 to 60, says Thomas Holland, a partner at the wealth advisory firm Global Vision Advisors.

It’s crucial that those seven out of 10 young workers who don’t have enough savings to last two months start saving right away. “Though the economy may be poor, what I find is that if you don’t establish savings habits early in your career, it’s not likely that at some golden age you’ll learn to save,” Holland says.

Here are some tips for workers in Generations X and Y who are trying to start saving:

Cut Your Expenses

“'Spend less than you earn’ is the fundamental principle of personal finance,” says J.D. Roth, co-author of the book “10,001 Ways to Live Large on a Small Budget.” “It seems really simple and obvious, but so many people don’t do that,” Roth says.

Evaluate regular expenses like a gym membership, Netflix (NFLX) subscription or unlimited text-messaging plan to see how much you’re really using them. “If you’re not actually using it very much, get rid of it,” says Trent Hamm, 30, author of the book “365 Ways to Live Cheap.”

“People in their 20s tend to do a lot of expensive things with their friends,” Hamm says. Don’t spend without thinking just to keep up with your peers, Hamm says. He suggests finding a hobby that you’re really passionate about. By focusing your mental energy on one thing you love – and seeking out friends who share that interest – you may find yourself not “spending money just for the sake of spending money,” Hamm says.

SmartMoney.com would like to invite you to visit our Variable Annuities Custom Resource Center.
Click here to find out more about this financial product and how it may apply to you.

1
2
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
goodyboo

4 Comments
This is a major shift from the way baby boomers came about. The previous generation earned, borrowed even more and spent. This inflated the monetary supply to bubble levels. When we borrow, banks create new money. They do not lend existing money: http://www.tradingstocks.net/html/banks_create_money.html This new money makes it easier to earn. FED encouraged this because it helped banks make more money. Government likes this, because it is easier to avoid recession with an ever expanding money supply. But it is a ponzi scheme that came to an abrupt halt: http://www.tradingstocks.net/html/housing_market_bubble_bust_cyc.html
Posted by: JediJoe7
Mjolnir75;

Yeah, I have to admit that my experiences with unions are tainted with a certain amount of violence and some disappointment. Hopefully they aren't all like that. I realize as you said the particular people involved do make a difference. I'm forced to agree with you when you said that sometimes a union may be your best chance for fair wages and benefits. As much as I don't care for unions now, I worked in a couple of companies that treated their employees not much better than slave labor. Once it was clear nothing was going to change I helped to organize a movement to get an union in for the employees. Of course that made me really popular with the management. I like to think that the need for a union is the exception rather than the norm, but seeing recent events, business practices and some politics it may be exactly what it takes to stop folks from dropping below the poverty line and getting good benefits. I certainly don't trust the government to do that.<...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: Mjolnir75
It sounds like you have had some bad experiences with your union. I understand your point of view. Fortunately the few bad experiences that I have had were largely over shadowed by postitive ones. I guess I have been lucky so far. In the end it comes down to the union you belong to. When I see how poorly my company treats their non union managers I know that I would have been treated equally poorly with out the union. From time to time those with selfish intentions get voted into power in our union but they are quickly voted out. At least I get a vote and that is more than any corporation will ever give you. I know if heads need to roll at my company they will roll by a clearly written out , and posted, list of inverse seniority and not by nepotism. Just like our with our government I have found that when a union is not doing what is should it is the memebers who sit by and do nothing that allow bad business to continue.

Yes there is corruption in everything but the biggest u...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: JediJoe7
FYI: I was a UAW worker for 6 years. I have family in the trucking industry, so I know something about the Teamsters too. The union did not do anything for me that I could not do for myself. In fact I personally know of instances where people were murdered and property destroyed by union thugs. If you want a union then you have the right to one, but they left a very bitter taste in my mouth. The unions look only after their own interests and if from time to time they happen to coincide with your own then luck smiles on you. I do have pension and medical benefits. They are not the best, but I have them. Even those get reduced in the name of "cost cutting" in this economy. They can't cut the pension, but they have screwed with the medical and the wages. There was a time at the turn of the century when unions served a REAL purpose, but not today. Union officals are behind much of the corruption in public office. They are in cohoots with corporation execs too. They must have...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: Mjolnir75
JediJoe7,

You sir could not be more wrong. Is it Union wages that have multiplied to grotesque new hights in the past twenty years? Sadly no, it was executive pay that skyrocketed. Corporations even reward c.e.o.s for failure, still! The auto industry has been unionized since 1935 and there was no issue with GM nor Crystler until the past administration. The banking industry it not unionized so where is your excuse there? The problem with the auto industry and the banking industry and the entire economy is the pure unchecked, unwatched greed of corporate executives and the corrupt elected officals who enable it. The unions in this country contribute pennies on the dollar to political campaigns as compared to wealthy corportae counterparts. Corporations don't move jobs overseas because of unions specificly, plenty of non union work has been lost over seas aswell. Corporations move overseas because they care more about profit than this great country and our government allows th...(Read more of this comment)
Advertisements

Related Quotes

NFLX 59.97 Down -0.29 -0.48%