Thursday September 2, 2010 11:03 AM ET
SmartMoney
  |  A A A
Insurance

Term or Whole Life?

Updated on September 10, 2008.

FOR MOST PEOPLE, the right type of life insurance can be summed up in a single word: term. But before we explain why, it's important to understand the differences between the most common types of insurance available. Our glossary can help with that, and decipher some of the more common insurance lingo.

The basic difference between term and whole life insurance is this: A term policy is life coverage only. On the death of the insured it pays the face amount of the policy to the named beneficiary. You can buy term for periods of one year to 30 years. Whole life insurance, on the other hand, combines a term policy with an investment component. The investment could be in bonds and money-market instruments or stocks. The policy builds cash value that you can borrow against. The three most common types of whole life insurance are traditional whole life policies, universal and variable. With both whole life and term, you can lock in the same monthly payment over the life of the policy.

Forced Savings

Whole life insurance is expensive: You're paying not only for insurance but also for the investment portion. That extra cost might almost be worth it if these policies were a good investment vehicle. But usually they aren't. Insurance agents like to call these policies retirement plans, emphasizing the "forced savings" inherent in forking over the premiums each month "for retirement."

Leaving aside the fact that there are many better ways to save for retirement, these policies come with high fees and commissions, which sometimes lop off as much as three percentage points from the annual return. On top of that, there are up-front (but hidden) commissions that are typically 100% of your first year's premium. Worse, it's often impossible to tell what the return on the investment will be, and how much of what you pay in goes toward the insurance and how much toward the investment.

Premiums for term insurance are downright cheap for people in good health up to about age 50. After that age, premiums start to get progressively more expensive. The same holds true for whole life policies, though people who need coverage starting in their 60s and beyond may have no alternative but to buy whole life. Most companies simply won't sell term policies to people over about age 65.

Term: Where the Value Is

To get a real sense of the value of term, let's compare a term policy and a universal life policy. Say a 40-year-old nonsmoking male has a choice between a $250,000 Met Life universal policy with a $3,000 annual premium and a same amount of renewable term coverage with a 20-year fixed premium of $350. At the end of one year, the universal policy, assuming it paid 5.7% per year, tax-deferred, would have a cash value of exactly zero (cash value is the amount you would get back if you canceled the policy). But say he had instead invested $2,650 (the difference between $3,000 and $350) in a no-load mutual fund that averaged a total return of 10% annually. At the end of the first year, he'd have $2,841, accounting for taxes on the earnings at a 28% rate. At the end of 10 years, he would have accumulated more than $46,000 in after-tax savings in the mutual fund. Over the same period, the cash value of the policy would have climbed only to $31,819.

That's not to say that whole life insurance is always a bad idea. Wealthy people can use whole life in their estate planning by setting up an insurance trust that will pay their estate taxes from the proceeds of the policy. And for the growing number of people in their late 40s or early 50s who are just starting families, whole life is at least worth a look.

Sizing Up a Whole Life Policy

One of the great problems with whole life is only an expert can tell if a policy you own or are considering will ever become a decent investment. James Hunt, actuary for the Consumer Federation of America, who has analyzed thousands of policies, notes that whole life policies hardly ever yield a reasonable return unless held for 20 years or more. So if you buy one be prepared to pay into it for the very long haul.

1
2
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook Facebook and Twitter Twitter
Bookmark and Share
RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
golfnate

1 Comments
Ricpernell I'm very sorry for your clients because they are getting ripped off by you, I noticed you did not write down how much premium your uncle paid in to get his 40k in cash value but I will guarantee he could have bought a term policy and invested the difference in premium between the 2 policies and come out ahead, the premiums are ridiculous on the policies you sell, you make a lot more commission on a universal life policy than a term so why not convince people to buy what makes you more money not whats best for them. 2% does not even keep up with inflation I cant believe you even advertise something that pathetic. You can sell a 30- 40 year old client 500k term coverage for half or less what they would pay for your 150k universal and have them invest the difference in a reputable mutual fund that has a track record of double digit returns and they would retire rich compared to the cash value they would have in your universal life. Please stop doing the wrong thing for your ...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: ricpernell
Why is it Joe Heller that if all you sell is term insurance all the other insurances and nothing more than loop holes for the rich and wealthy? These are not loop holes, but tax codes that have existed for many years. Cash build up in permanent policy's have always been there for people to use to save in a tax deferred way and have access to the cash value tax free and you don't have to be wealthy to do so. My Uncle had a whole life policy that he has had for many years and recently found out that he had accumulated over $40,000 cash in the policy. He is now taking out $500 a month to help with his retirement. TAX FREE.He also has a death benefit of $100,000 that will pass on to his wife tax free when he dies. So what's your problem? He could'nt do that with term. Not a tax loop hole, but a tax code. Look it up...I personally use Equity Index Universal Life for my clients because it allows cash build up based on the rise in the S&P 500 without experiencing the losses in the S&P 500. Wi...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: A0110915r
The real PURPOSE of life insurance is to protect your family in the event you die unexpectedly -- that's why Term is so appropriate. Using it solely for tax dodging is risky - tax laws can change. Dieseldollar and JoeHeller are correct that under current laws life insurance can be used to avoid paying taxes. I personally consider this immoral, since we all should be paying our fair share of taxes and life insurance creates a loophole, allowing the rich to avoid their fair share of taxes (which means the rest of us have an unfair share of the tax burden). Several very rich men with high moral standards, such as Bill Gates and Warren Buffet, have said as much. Only a few people are rich enough to benefit from the loopholes anyway. But what happens if congress gets its act together and closes these loopholes? Then your excessive whole life policy will sure seem foolish.
Posted by: JoeHeller
More info: http://www.buytermlife.com
Posted by: JoeHeller
dieseldollar is very extremely right. But let's hope the Estate tax is gone by the time the 85-year-old dies.
Advertisements