Sunday November 8, 2009 1:13 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published April 2, 2007  |  A A A
Real Estate by Aleksandra Todorova (Author Archive)

More Real Estate Brokers Are Reducing Their 6% Fees

WHEN 27-YEAR-OLD Boris Labinov put his downtown Chicago apartment on the market several weeks ago, his real estate broker made him an offer he couldn't refuse: hire him to find the new, bigger place he was looking for, and he'd cut his fee on the sale from 6% (the standard commission for a full-service broker) to 4.5%.

Later this month, when Labinov is scheduled to close on a 3,000-square-foot townhouse in the up-and-coming West Loop neighborhood in Chicago, he will save as much as $4,500 off his broker's commission.

The real estate madness of the past several years had one side effect that often goes unnoticed today: It created a glut of real estate agents. "There are a lot of people out there who have been attracted to the possibility of getting 6% of what are now very high sale prices," says Lawrence White, an economics professor at the New York University Stern School of Business, who recently published a paper on competition in the residential real estate brokerage industry.

Consider this: The National Association of Realtors (NAR) had 1.36 million members in 2006, when 7.5 million new and existing homes were sold. (Not all real estate agents have a Realtor certification and the total number of licensed real estate agents is likely double that, or more than two million, according to NAR's spokesman Walter Molony.) Back in 2000, NAR had half as many members — 767,000 — to share 6.5 million home sales.

As more brokers compete for sales in a slowing real estate market, savvy homeowners can save thousands by negotiating their commissions. "Commissions are becoming more negotiable than used to be the case," White says. He chalks it up to several factors, including more competition from discount and a-la-carte brokers, which offer less comprehensive services than full-service brokers, but charge discounted sales commissions or offer buyers rebates upon closing. (For more on discount brokers, click here.) And then there's more consumer awareness of the market. Thanks to web sites like Zillow.com, anyone with an Internet connection can find out what homes are for sale or recently sold in a given area — information once only available to real estate agents.

In theory, of course, broker commissions are always negotiable. Setting up fixed commission rates has, in fact, been considered illegal since a 1950s Supreme Court ruling. But real estate brokers certainly don't want you to know that. "The owners of the large [broker] firms want everyone to think the broker fee is 6%," says Jay Michael, Labinov's realtor and the founder of Estate Property Group, a boutique real estate firm in Chicago that, while a full-service brokerage, negotiates its fees with its clients, typically charging 4.5% to 5.5%.

But Diane Saatchi, a senior vice president at the Corcoran Group, a full-service real estate brokerage in New York, says negotiating broker fees can be a big mistake if you want your home to sell fast. "Imagine there are 10 properties for sale," she says. "Nine are offering a 6% commission, one is offering 5%. And they're all equal [properties]. Which one is likely to sell first?"

1. Use leverage. If you're selling your home and buying a new one at the same time, ask your broker if they'll offer a lower commission in exchange for using their services on both transactions. The same goes for selling an "in-demand" property: If your house is in a good school district and you know it will sell quickly, ask your broker for a commission reduction.

2. Go with a smaller firm. The smaller a company is, the less red tape your realtor has to go through in order to get permission to discount his or her fee, Michael says. That's because the broker's firm typically takes half of his or her commission.

3. Consider the alternatives. If one broker refuses to negotiate, remember there are thousands of others out there. Some, like New York- and New Jersey-based discount brokerage Foxtons, offer full-range services at a fixed 4% rate. The savings, according to Les Newlands, a senior vice president at Foxtons, come from lower overhead expenses, as the firm's brokers have virtual offices.

Don't be shy to ask your broker for a cut of his commission, especially if you found the listing yourself (not an unlikely scenario these days, as buyers increasingly start their home search online). Just keep in mind that some states prohibit brokers from offering rebates, although their number has decreased in recent years as the Department of Justice (DOJ) seeks legal action against such regulations, alleging they restrict competition among brokers. The 10 states that still have such rebate bans, according to the DOJ, are Alabama, Alaska, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Oregon.

Not the 5% one, she says, as buyers' brokers — who get half of the selling broker's commission — will be less inclined to show it to their clients. "People who try to negotiate upfront, I'd never take that listing," she says, suggesting that sellers try to negotiate a lower commission once they have an offer from a buyer.

She may be one of the last holdouts. Even traditional full-service brokers are starting to realize the need to compete on fees. The average home-sale commission at Realogy Corp., which owns full-service brokerages Corcoran, Coldwell Banker, Sotheby's International Realty, and franchises Century 21, was 2.48% in 2006, according to the company's annual report filing with the SEC. That figure has been declining steadily since at least 2002, when the average was 2.63%. This means the total commission paid out by sellers actually averaged less than 5% last year. (According to a Coldwell Banker spokesman, commissions vary greatly across the country, so while some areas may average more than 6%, others may average much less.)

Meanwhile, some full-service brokers say they have always given breaks to clients, regardless of the real estate market at the time. "I've done that for family members and for repeat buyers or sellers that have stayed with me over the years," says Susan Moock, a realtor with Keller Williams Realty in Bucks County, Pa., who has more than 20 years of experience. She says she's often given breaks to her sellers or a credit toward closing costs for her buyers, coming out of her own part of the commission.

These days, she notes, she is seeing more commission reductions as house prices have increased. "I hardly ever charge a full 6%," she says. "If the people are not resistant, then of course I'll charge 6%. But if they're hemming and hawing and say that's a lot of money on a $600,000 home, that is a lot of money."

SmartMoney.com would like to invite you to visit our Variable Annuities Custom Resource Center.
Click here to find out more about this financial product and how it may apply to you.

Find More Articles About: Real Estate, Buying
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
Bookmark and Share RSS
  To license SmartMoney content and tools, click here
User Comments
Posted by: steely11
The technology of the internet and ease of information it provides makes purchasing goods and services more competitive in every business. It is just a matter of time until it changes the way property changes hands all together.
Look at the music business, completely changed from how it was 10 years ago, same with stocks, bonds, cars you name it..technology has changed how we buy and sell. There will still be agents but not as many and their commissions will fall.
Posted by: NYrealtor
The poster 'shuttlecr' is wrong. I don't know even one agent who has ever put their own home on the market and didn't offer a full commission. Often times agents will offer 3.5% or 4% on the buyer brokers side.
Posted by: NYrealtor
Ask any agent who was around last time the market dived (late 80s early 90s), and they are hard to find since so many agents are new trying to capitalize on the boom market, and you will know that fees go up in a down market. This is because the home stays on the market much longer and needs a lot more attention (marketing) which means much higher costs to have a listing.
Posted by: NYrealtor
I remember commissions of 8% to 10%. Only the new agents and brokers are willing to cut fees in a down market because they don't know they are driving themselves out of business by increasing their overhead and reducing their income. I'll still be here when they give up and retreat to their 9-5 desk jobs. I've seen it before. And, quite frankly, do sellers really want an agent who is so quick to cut their own income and take food off their own kids' plates?
Posted by: NYrealtor
If the agent won't protect their own money, how can a seller possibly kid themselves into believing the agent will protect the seller's money? They won't, they will do whatever they have to to achieve the quickest sale -- not the highest price. I want the highest price because it pays me more. Give me an agent any day that will fight for the highest price, not the quickest sale!
Advertisements