Sunday November 22, 2009 6:43 AM ET
SmartMoney
Published March 20, 2009  |  A A A
SmartMoney Magazine by Jason Kephart (Author Archive)

10 Things the IRS Won't Tell You

Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next
 

4. “The AMT is our ATM.”

When the alternative minimum tax was introduced in 1969, it affected only a handful of taxpayers with high income and big deductions. But by 2010, it will hit 87 percent of married couples with income between $75,000 and $100,000. That’s not what it was designed to do; the AMT was meant to force big earners with lots of deductions to pay their fair share. Now it “brings in a group of taxpayers the IRS has no problem with,” says Olson. “The AMT has run its course.” The problem is, the AMT hasn’t been updated to account for inflation. Instead, Congress has been adjusting exemption criteria on a yearly basis. “It’s just a Band-Aid,” says Hockenberry.

The Band-Aid in this year’s stimulus plan reduces the number of taxpayers subject to the AMT to 4.4 million—it would’ve been 30 million, according to the Tax Policy Center. But if you’re living in a high-tax state or married with two or more kids, you might find as you calculate both your regular return along with the AMT—form 6251, which taxpayers are responsible for—that you could be liable for the latter. Confused? The IRS offers AMT assistance at www.irs.gov; click on “Online Services.”

1,001 Things They Won't Tell You

Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next
 

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: Taxpayer_Owner
Sure Ms. Olson has talked about the IRS's shortcomings, ruffled a few feathers, and wrote some tough reports. Unfortunately, Ms. Olson has not been able to get very much accomplished in her seven years on the job other then create a high employee turnover rate. She tried to simplify the tax code by creating a standard definition of a child. When all was said and done, she only made matters worse. So much worse, the law had to be amended.

Ms. Olson also destroyed the very program in the IRS that was set up to assist taxpayers. Before Ms. Olson, if you needed help with a tax problem that was not dealt with satisfactorily through normal channels the IRS would transfer your case over to a group that had the experience in your particular issue and the authority to fix your problem on the spot. Ms. Olson has forsaken this logic. Now if you need help and your case is transferred over to her program it will most likely be assigned to someone that is not experienced or even prop...(Read more of this comment)
BackType
Comments From Around the Web
Posted by: Pat on Blueprint for Financial Prosperity

Yeah. I’ve never encountered the IRS since I’ve never left the Vault.

Posted by: joshua on Blueprint for Financial Prosperity

All I got out of this was Fallout 3 is greatness.

Posted by: thomas on Blueprint for Financial Prosperity

I would wet myself twice if I got a letter from the IRS.

Posted by: savvy on Blueprint for Financial Prosperity

We got one of these last year in reference to our 2006 return. It turns out I had reported the wrong W-2 income (used 2005 instead of 2006, not sure how I did that). Once I figured out the problem, I responded to the IRS with a copy of the correct W-2 as well as what I thought I owed. They agreed and because it was an honest mistake and I responded promptly (and paid the agreed amount), they waived the penalties. Note that, generally speaking, anything that affects your federal return will probably affect your state return as well. I filed an amended state return and got back a whopping $8

Advertisements