Sunday November 22, 2009 1:02 PM ET
SmartMoney
Want more tax-saving advice before you file? Download our free Tax Guide here.
Published August 1, 2008  |  A A A
The Tax Guy by Bill Bischoff (Author Archive)

3 Brand-New Tax Changes You Need to Know About

THE AMERICAN HOUSING Rescue and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 (the Housing Act) was signed into law on July 30. The new legislation is supposed to stem the tide of home foreclosures and provide a lifeline to floundering mortgage lenders. It also includes three federal income tax changes that will affect many individuals. Two are intended to be helpful, but the third is meant to hurt. Here's what you need to know about all three.


Congress wants you to believe the new tax credit of up to $7,500 for qualified buyers of principal residences is a really terrific break. Not so fast. Here's the truth:

The maximum credit equals the lesser of: (1) 10% of the home purchase price, or (2) $7,500 ($3,750 if you're married and file separately from your spouse). The credit is refundable. That means you can use it to offset your entire regular federal income tax liability plus receive the difference from Uncle Sam should the credit exceed your tax bill.

The credit is generally available for a principal residence purchased after April 8, 2008, and before July 1, 2009. However, you're only eligible if you have not owned a principal residence in the U.S. during the three-year period that ends on the purchase date. If married, your spouse must pass this test too. You also can't buy the home from your spouse, an ancestor (parent, grandparent, and so on), or a lineal descendant (child, grandchild, and so on). If you build a new home, the purchase date is considered to be the day you move in.

If you make a qualified home next year (before the July 1, 2009 deadline), you can opt to pretend the transaction happened in 2008 and claim a credit on this year's Form 1040. That will get the money to you a lot quicker. Otherwise, you can claim the credit for a 2009 purchase on next year's Form 1040, which you won't be able to file until sometime in 2010.

Fair enough. Now for the things Congress hopes you're too dumb to remember by election time.

It's Phased Out for "High-Income" Types
The credit is phased out or completely eliminated if your adjusted gross income (AGI) is "too high."

* The phase-out range for unmarried individuals and married folks who file separately is between AGI of $75,000 and $95,000. For example, say you're single with 2008 AGI of $90,000. If you buy a principal residence between now and year-end, the phase-out rule would reduce your credit by 75% to only $1,875 [$7,500 - ($15,000/$20,000 x $7,500) = $1,875].

* The phase-out range for married joint filers is between AGI of $150,000 and $170,000. For example, if your AGI is $170,000 or higher, there's no credit for you.

You Gotta Repay It
Finally — here's the real gem — the new credit is really just a loan from the feds. You have to repay it (without interest) over 15 years starting with the second year after the year you claim the credit.

For example, say you bag the maximum $7,500 credit for a 2008 home purchase. In 2010, you'll have to repay $500 ($7,500/15 = $500) with that year's Form 1040 and then continue the repayment drill through 2024 (unless you die first). If you sell the home or stop using it as your principal residence before repaying the credit, you'll generally have to cough up the unpaid balance with your Form 1040 for the year when that happens.

Now wait a minute! Wasn't the whole foreclosure mess caused by too many people borrowing too much money? Doesn't this new credit (which is really only a disguised loan) just add to the problem? No wonder Congress has a 19% approval rating! Your average citizen couldn't come up with anything this stupid.

SmartMoney.com would like to invite you to visit our Variable Annuities Custom Resource Center.
Click here to find out more about this financial product and how it may apply to you.

1
2
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: ReEconomist
There is a handy, free online directory of the new housing law (HR 3221) found t
http://www.UsHousingMeltdown.org/2008-housing-law.asp

Just click on the table of contents to find the relevant page(s)

Highlights:
First time home buyer tax credit (loan) found on pages 628-637.
Changes to qualifying second home for tax exemption found on pages 690-693.
New deduction for property taxes for non-itemizers on pages 637-638.
Help for Homeowners, the requirements for refinancing start on page 394.

What's legislation without some pork?
Pork for auto manufacture found on pages 675-676.
Pork for foreign rail car manufacture found on pages 680-681.
Posted by: hayekcapitalist
Deregulation gave you, vendors, suppliers, buyers all of the beneifts of competitiion. The cost, some employers, and employess,who rejet the responsibility of cholce theory and are uncomfortable havng to process information autonomosly want to retyrn to the old days when oligarchs ruled the world, and union job were virtual lifetimne appointmes. Ring,rrinngg, ((ring)), message for you, we ain't going back..adapt or die.
Posted by: hayekcapitalist
SWADESH: your application of the structure and content of the Laffer Curve argues the opposite. Rad Victor Canto, larry Kudlow, Thomas Sowell, Milton Friedman and others viewed laffer as a piece of the puzzle that unravelled the shroud of Keynesiism and the Phillips curve implictions.What you are alluding to was actually used bf Professor Laffer and Larry kudlow, anong others, to convince President Reagan to stimulate the supply side by lowering marginal income tax and capita gain rates. And it worked, just like it did for JFK, and Bill Clinton: total tax revenues grew contrary to the predictions of the static models of the CBO.To reiterate: transfer payments of various and sundry types and permutations grew even more rapidly than these robust revenue growth rates. You apparently have an religious fervor detector that is lacking in most, truly a gift, as I never mentioned religion in my related posts. Neverthess if the Spirit is leading you to choose to become less dogmatic and more in...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: theDagda
I don't see too much problem with this new law, and it looks like most of the aggravation about it is because it doesn't help higher income folks. So what? I don't benefit from any of this because our household income is above the limit (not by much), but that's ok be me. But I'd be plenty happy to take an interest free loan over 15 years! This wasn't intended to help people in the higher income brackets, and why should it? If that's the worst part about this law, then it must have been a pretty good compromise bill by Congress.

And lastly, in response to the comments made below: blaming this on Democrats is about as baseless as saying God put George Dumb-ya in the White House. Who was in control of the White House during the past ~8 years, and who has been in control of Congress until the past couple of years? Yeah, you may be smart but you don't fool me ;) Just remember - de-regulation helped cause a lot of this mess, and remember who espouses de-regulation like it w...(Read more of this comment)
Posted by: JSwadesh
(Continuing from previous post)

Just in time for the next snake oil salesman to cut taxes and explode the deficit. Our national debt is now around $10T, close to 70% of GDP.

These facts are very well established. There is no argument. But, please, don't let me disturb your religious reverie.
Advertisements