Sunday November 22, 2009 9:03 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published June 16, 2009  |  A A A
Deal of the Day by Lisa Scherzer (Author Archive)

5 States Hitting Residents With Big Tax Hikes

1
2
3
4
5
6
Next
 

Updated July 2, 2009.

State legislators faced with mammoth budget gaps and sharply lower revenue are looking to residents to bail them out.

The shortfall for the 2010 fiscal year totals $166 billion across 48 states, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a think tank in Washington, D.C., that tracks state deficits. States are addressing those gaps in various ways, one of which is raising taxes. Twenty-five states have passed tax hikes this year, and another 12 are considering doing so, according to the CBPP. Lawmakers around the country are realizing that the budget holes are too big to be filled by cuts alone.

"Pretty much everyone is doing poorly," says Kim Rueben, a senior research associate at the Tax Policy Center. "It's just a question of who's hurting more than others."

The heaviest cuts have come in California, which is now on the brink of a financial meltdown. The Golden State is projecting that it will fall short by more than $25 billion in fiscal 2010 and is preparing to issue IOUs to companies and individuals owed money by the state. New York is a distant second with a projected $17.6 billion deficit for 2010, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), a bipartisan policy research organization in Washington, D.C.

How can these states miss the mark so badly? The recession has sapped the two major sources of state revenue: income taxes (thanks to rising unemployment, fewer people are getting paid) and sales taxes (quite simply, consumers are spending less). “Those two things together really, really lead to a high loss of tax revenues, far in excess of loss of income,” says Michael Hicks, director of Ball State University’s Center for Business and Economic Research.

Even though raising taxes are typically a last resort, many states have no choice but to do so. And, in some, lawmakers are leaving no stone unturned when it comes to finding items or services to tax. New York, for instance, has raised taxes on tobacco, wine and limo services. Meanwhile, Massachusetts lawmakers approved a tax on satellite television service and Georgia lawmakers proposed a “pole tax” that would charge gentlemen’s club patrons $5 at the door. 

To figure out which states are inflicting the biggest tax hikes on residents, SmartMoney pored over reports from tax research groups and contacted state budget offices. We looked at state budget deficits tracked by the NCSL and current sales tax rate data from the Federation of Tax Administrators, a group that provides services to state tax authorities. Finally, we turned to the Tax Foundation -- a nonpartisan tax research group -- for figures on tax burden, the average percentage of each state's residents' income that is paid in state and local taxes; the figures we use are for 2008. 

SmartMoney.com would like to invite you to visit our Variable Annuities Custom Resource Center.
Click here to find out more about this financial product and how it may apply to you.

1
2
3
4
5
6
Next
 

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: fatfacefenner
What Lisa does not mention as a cause of the problem is the unsubstainable benefits the states hand out using tax payer money. Yes revenues are down, but she should mention excessive spending (gold plated retirements, collecting retirement & working at a state job at the same time, etc) Paying retirement at 30% over their last pay rate is crazy.
Posted by: socalpez
I live in California and the details on my State's fiscal situation are entirely misleading. In addition, the residents tax burden just got increased by somewhere in the range of $12-15 billion for this fiscal year. Also, it's reported that the massive swings in revenue are also contributed to by decrease in post-dot.com boom capital gains tax revenue. Lastly, if you truly reported fact from fiction the nearly $25 billion deficit includes proposed year-over-year budget increases that have yet to be enacted so should that be factored into the deficit amount? Based on what i've read it seems like the true deficit for next fiscal year is somewhere in the range of $8-10 billion which can be covered by cuts to government overhead (i.e., union employees!).
Posted by: willmb
"The sales tax here remains relatively low at just 4%." Well, yes, if you leave off the county component. In my upstate county, the total sales tax is 8%. And the county can't really do anything about this, because a huge chunk of the taxes collected by the county is for state mandates. Just as Congress enacts legislation whose burden is passed on to the states, so the states in turn pass it on to the counties. That way, nobody has been seen to raise taxes except for the local guys, and they are expendable.
BackType
Comments From Around the Web
Posted by: CliffDropOver on reddit.com

Well, somebody has to pay the Rent on Civilization!

Advertisements