Sunday November 8, 2009 1:46 AM ET
SmartMoney
Want more tax-saving advice before you file? Download our free Tax Guide here.
Published June 17, 2009  |  A A A
The Tax Guy by Bill Bischoff (Author Archive)

Tax Breaks for Ponzi-Scheme Victims

If you've been cheated in a Ponzi investment scheme a la Bernie Madoff, the IRS wants to cut you some slack. The feds will let you treat your loss as a tax-favored ordinary loss rather than a capital loss.

Here’s what you need to know.

Capital Losses (Bad) Vs. Ordinary Losses (Good)

The IRS generally takes a dim view of taxpayer attempts to treat investment securities losses as anything other than capital losses. Capital losses fare poorly under our beloved federal income tax system. You can only deduct them to the extent of capital gains for the year, plus another $3,000 ($1,500 if you use married filing separate status). Any leftover capital losses get carried forward to the following year, and the same limitation rule applies all over again.

As a result, it can take years to fully deduct big capital losses.

In contrast, ordinary losses are treated quite well. They can be written off against any type of income (salary, interest, dividends, capital gains, self-employment income, you name it). If you have a big ordinary loss that exceeds what you can deduct in the loss year, the excess can potentially create a net operating loss. You can carry a net operating loss back to previous years and recover taxes you paid earlier, or you can carry it forward to shelter income in future years, which will be especially helpful if tax rates go up.

Ordinary Loss Treatment for Ponzi-Scheme Victims

The IRS has announced it will allow favorable ordinary loss treatment for investment theft losses. Basically, such losses occur when your money is never actually used for the intended purpose of acquiring investment assets.

Instead, the money is hijacked by the perpetrator of a fraud. The classic example is the so-called Ponzi scheme where money collected from later “investors” is used to cover “income distributions” and “withdrawals” paid to earlier “investors” without any investments ever actually being made.

Taxpayer-friendly ordinary loss treatment takes some of the sting out of Ponzi scheme losses. Unfortunately, however, there are plenty of victims who can benefit from the IRS's enlightened attitude. Not only did Bernie Madoff lose some $65 billion of investors' money, but other similar frauds have since come to light. The sad truth is, Ponzi losses are more widespread than you might think.

SmartMoney.com would like to invite you to visit our Variable Annuities Custom Resource Center.
Click here to find out more about this financial product and how it may apply to you.

1
2
Next
Find More Articles About: Personal Finance, Taxes, Consumer, Tax Filing, IRS, Investing
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
Bookmark and Share RSS
  To license SmartMoney content and tools, click here
BackType
Comments From Around the Web
Posted by: matt on The Big Picture

@tradeking13: She’s not a hermit. She’s a computer generated: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXsd5aw8oas see

Posted by: tradeking13 on The Big Picture

Megan Fox is a hermit? That is so hot.

Posted by: Mike in Nola on The Big Picture

Andy T: Saw the last dozen or so games while getting a burger at Culver’s in the Woodlands. Agree with your assessment. Guess no one charges the net any more. Out of curiousity, I looked up leftie tennis stars and it seems that day is past: Laver, Connors, McEnroe, Navratilova and Renee Richards.

Posted by: Andy T on The Big Picture

“Haven't kept up with tennis for awhile. Since it has become more about high velocity serves, that may not longer be important.” No doubt. Anyone who saw wimbledon saw a display of high velocity serves and what becomes of a match when such a thing occurs. It was a terrific match because it was a display of human endurance, strength, intensity, etc….but it was no McEnroe/Borg circa 1980….that was a slugfest today. I came away disappointed because today, I thought Rodd!*k was the better tennis player, but Federer somehow outlasted him. If they played again in two weeks, I would bet on Rodd!*k.

Posted by: matt on The Big Picture

@Mike in Nola: Ross Perot’s $1 gas tax proposal wouldn’t have helped pay down the deficit at all. We both know what would have happened. Congressman #1: Look at all of this extra money pouring in. Let’s start some more social programs. Congressman #2: Perot will probably veto the bill. Congressman #1: Are you kidding me? Not only do we have a two thirds majority, we have a 100 percent majority - that is, 100 percent of us like to vote entitlements to our constituents so we can stay in office destroying this country forever (and making more than 3 times the median income doing it).

Advertisements