THE RECENT CONVENTIONS included plenty of rhetoric about taxes. But the politicians in both parties missed the boat. Whether you think we need tax cuts or tax hikes, what we need even more is tax simplicity.
Our tax system is falling apart because it's become way too complicated. Tax breaks are not as helpful as advertised because many taxpayers can't figure out how to use them. Tax increases don't raise the expected revenue because many taxpayers are unwilling to spend extra time and money to comply only to get a bigger tax bill for their trouble.
If you doubt that tax complexity is a huge problem, consider the fact that my personal copy of the Internal Revenue Code takes up over 8,500 pages of very fine print. Then there are many thousands of pages of regulations and other guidance put out by the IRS in efforts to explain how the tax law provisions are supposed to work. Then there are many more thousands of pages of court decisions dealing with unresolved disputes about how they are supposed to work. I can't keep up with all this stuff, even though it's my profession. The average individual or small-business owner has no hope.
And it's getting worse — fast! Just in the last nine months, Congress passed six significant new tax laws. Every one of them added more complexity, and there will be more new laws before year-end. This is change we can be disgusted with.
When guys like me who make a living from dealing with tax complications start ranting about too much complexity, it's time for you ordinary citizens out there to demand an end to the nonsense. Here's what you should be howling about to your Congresspersons:
The dreaded alternative minimum tax, which hits many middle-income folks by disallowing deductions for dependents and state and local income and property taxes.
Tricky rules that can cause you to pay federal income tax on up to 85% of your Social Security benefits — even though you already paid income tax on Social Security taxes when they were taken out of your salary or self-employment earnings.
Phase-out rules that reduce or eliminate the chance for middle-income folks to claim the child tax credit and education tax credits.
I could go on and on, but you get the idea. It's time to tell the politicians to be straight with you by raising or lowering your taxes with easy-to-understand rate changes. The current practice of granting well-advertised tax goodies and then sneakily taking them away from less-favored folks has got to stop.
For example, after the devastating Gulf Coast hurricanes in 2005, Congress enacted a bunch of exceedingly complicated special tax breaks intended to help individuals and businesses rebuild. This was on top of many billions worth of direct relief from the Feds and many billions more from charitable donations. In my opinion, the tax breaks were unnecessary overkill, but they sure added lots more complexity. The beleaguered IRS is still trying to catch up on issuing guidance about how all the special breaks are supposed to work.
Another example is the absurd new tax credit of up to $7,500 for eligible home buyers. (For details, click here.) The credit is phased out at relatively low income levels, and it has to be paid back to the government over 15 years. After all the billions and billions the Feds will have to spend to bail out mortgage lenders and Freddie Mac (FRE) and Fannie Mae (FNM), this goofy credit is an insult to our intelligence. It's not going to make the housing market recover any faster, but it sure makes the Internal Revenue Code more complicated while adding billions to the deficit. Great idea!
As a result, the amount of federal income taxes that big corporations actually pay is laughably low. Although I can't prove it, I'm sure that a major reduction in the corporate tax rate combined with an end to corporate welfare would be great for our economy. Plus we could cut a few hundred pages out of the Internal Revenue Code as a bonus. This isn't micromanagement. This is a big idea.
I can cite other examples of attempts to inject "fairness" into the tax law. Such attempts often result in rules that are too complicated to be effective — which isn't fair to anybody.
Also See:
The Tax Guy: Which Vehicles Qualify for Alternative Fuel Credit?
The Tax Guy: IRAs Are Better Than Ever
The Tax Guy: A Sneaky New Twist on the Wash Sale Rules
I don't care whether you call it a fair tax or a flat tax, I just want the &*^%$# IRS to disappear forever. With 66,000+ pages in our tax code and that nigger Rangel being in charge of the Ways and Means Committee and an acknowledged cheater on his own taxes we are in deep do-do. Is there no-one with the cajones in government to get something done?
Neither the Fair Tax or Flat Taxes that have been proposed can gain the necessary support. At the hedgehogparty.com, we favor a flat tax with two important modification. First, all major overhauls must be accompanied by a balanced budget consitiution amendment...otherwise they will morph into what we have now.
Second, the income rich are heavily taxed, but the very wealthy control taxable income and are undertaxed. The hedgehog party adds a limited 1% asset tax on the top 10% of asset holders. Virtually all other taxes (including SS and Medical taxes) are eliminated. Again supported by constitutional amendment.
www.hedgehogparty.com
The problem with a 'flat tax' is that reagan tried it in the 80s. And it morphed into the mess we have now. Congress is unlikely to leave it alone. The good thing about the fairtax is the provision for negating or overturning the amendment to the constitution that allows congress to have an income tax in the first place (for those of you who thought they were just allowed to do it, no, the founders did not put that as one of the powers of congress, so it is, for all intents and purposes, not there, without the amendment).
The fair tax is not the same as a national sales tax. Hence, the different name. It includes a 'prebate' - which is a check to every single legal resident in this country, equal to the amount of tax one would pay on the 'basic necessities of life.' Although that sounds a little complicated, realistically, our government does that type of analysis all the time. The end result is to negate the argument that a sales tax taxes most the people with the least. So those who make very little, would get at least all of the tax they pay back each month (or quarter, or year, or however they want to do it).
Also, you only tax the end product, not each product along the line. If you own a business and buy something for it, you wouldn't pay taxes on it - you would only charge taxes to an end user.
This article should be required reading for all voters. All of Obama's tax cuts for the 'middle class' are actually complicated credits, many of which go to people that don't actually pay income taxes. Once upon a time this was known as welfare. We also have to decide how far we want to go towards socialism in the name of 'fairness'. With the bottom half of wage earners paying virtually nothing in income taxes and therefore having no skin in the game, we are creating a moral hazzard.