Stretch Your Nest Egg: Target-Date Fund Facts

Editor's Note: Retirement-planning in normal times is like home maintenance with a little bit of effort and expense, applied regularly over time, you keep your structure sound. But planning right now is like figuring out what to do after a tornado blows your kitchen and garage into the next county. Despite the market s recent rally, many people s nest egg portfolios remain mangled beyond recognition. In this special report, SmartMoney features advice that can help investors roll up their sleeves and rebuild.

Target-date funds are designed to get defensive over time, moving investors assets from stocks to bonds and cash so that the portfolios become less risky as the funds (and the investors) get older. In 2006, Congress passed a law allowing retirement-plan sponsors to make target-date funds a default option for workers savings, and over the next two years their assets rocketed up 76 percent. But last year s crash marked their first real test, and many of them failed it especially those that should have been the most conservative. The average 2010 fund, supposedly designed for someone who would retire next year, lost almost 25 percent in 2008, according to the research firm Lipper. And the most aggressive funds in this group, like Oppenheimer s Transition 2010 (OTTBX), fell more than 40 percent. (An Oppenheimer spokesperson says that one-year results are not a true assessment of long-term performance. ) Talk about a turnabout: Less than three years after green-lighting the funds wider use, a Senate committee is now investigating their risks.

Investors within a year or two of retiring typically slash their exposure to the stock market to avoid just this kind of problem. There s no reason a 2010 fund should be swinging for the fences, says Brigham Young professor Israelsen. But investors can t assume funds that share their hoped-for retirement date will match their risk tolerance. Israelsen says it comes down to competition. As the target-date field got more crowded, many funds took on more equity, presumably to generate higher returns. With titans Fidelity, Vanguard and T. Rowe Price making up about 85 percent of the market, funds from smaller companies were especially prone to doing this so they could stand out. Alan Sparer, a San Francisco based securities lawyer who has been studying the funds, says their bond holdings can be dicey too; he has seen big allocations of risky derivatives such as commercial mortgage-backed securities in some portfolios.

The result: big disparities in returns. An investor who put $1 million three years ago in AllianceBernstein s 2010 Retirement Strategy fund (LTDAX) would have seen decent gains for two years. But the latest market turmoil would have knocked her balance down to nearly $750,000, because the fund had 68 percent of its assets in stock and real estate trusts when the market started to crash last fall. Had she invested that money in the Wells Fargo Advantage Dow Jones Target 2010 fund (STNRX), she would still have $970,000 today in part because that fund holds only 27 percent of its assets in stocks. Seth Masters, chief investment officer with AllianceBernstein, says high equity percentages are necessary to help a portfolio last the 30 years people are likely to live in retirement. Any fund with a longer-term investment perspective did poorly in 2008, he says.

Investors shouldn t necessarily give up on target-date funds. For current shareholders, for example, selling now would mean locking in losses. For those who are several years away from retirement, some planners say that a balanced portfolio with a 60-40 ratio of stocks to bonds can do the same job as a target-date fund, with fewer surprises. Across the fund industry in general, balanced funds are slightly less expensive than target-date funds. T. Rowe Price says its research shows that over the long term, target-date funds and 60-40 portfolios can be expected to deliver almost identical returns. One important caveat: Once you re within five years of retiring, a 60 percent stock allocation may be more risky than you want just ask some of those target-date fund owners.

Read the rest of our special report:

INVESTOR CENTER

MARKETS:
Chart
TODAY
Portfolio Chart

RESEARCH STOCKS & FUNDS

The Retirement Planner

See if your retirement is on track

Retiree Asset Allocation

Plan out your investments.

See More Tools

Answer Engine
Find Answers to Life's Challenges  

Find solutions to this and many other problems using

Answer Engine from SmartMoney. 

Copyright 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit
www.djreprints.com.