Wednesday November 25, 2009 12:35 AM ET
SmartMoney
Published October 29, 2008  |  A A A
SmartMoney Magazine by Daren Fonda (Author Archive)

Which Hybrids Are Worth It? Our Guide

Despite the dramatic drop in gas prices in recent weeks, hybrid vehicles remain a bright spot in an otherwise dismal American car market. There’s just one problem: When it comes to reaching the promised land of optimal fuel efficiency, some hybrid owners are starting to ask a question: “Are we there yet?”

Green-minded drivers shopping for fuel sippers are finding that unless it’s a gold-standard Toyota Prius or Honda Civic (each promising 45 highway mpg), the current crop of hybrids offer surprisingly measly mileage. Half of the 2009 hybrids rated by the Environmental Protection Agency, from the Cadillac Escalade to the Lexus LS 600h L, barely crack 25 mpg.

Automakers say part of the problem may actually be American driving habits, which are still far from green-friendly. They also point out that many customers are happy with at least some improvement over their SUV days—understandable, considering that a nonhybrid two-wheel-drive Escalade, for one, gets only 15 mpg. Indeed, with most hybrids besting their conventional models’ mileage by at least 10 percent, environmentalists see the gains as something to build on. “It’s a start,” says Jim Kliesch, a senior engineer with the Union of Concerned Scientists, a nonprofit environmental advocacy group.

But analysts say the hybrid story is a little more complicated—and that manufacturers share as much blame as the aggressive, lead-footed American driver. Detroit automakers, in particular, came late to the hybrid party in terms of research and development. Not only did they launch their first model into the U.S. market nearly five years after the Japanese, but critics point out that the vehicles they initially chose to “hybridize” were not necessarily those that would yield the maximum green benefit. According to a J.D. Power survey, consumers think hybrids should deliver a 68 percent improvement over conventional models. That’s “totally unrealistic,” says Mike Marshall, director of automotive technologies at J.D. Power.

Gas-and-electric cars may seem like a new-millennium invention, but engineers were actually tinkering with the technology as far back as 1900, when a young automotive upstart named Ferdinand Porsche added a combustion engine to his pioneering Elektromobil. The idea largely went fallow until the 1960s, when a handful of eco-friendly engine designs slowly began to emerge—and then sputter. It wasn’t until 1994, when a Toyota executive challenged his company’s engineers to double their current cars’ fuel efficiency, that the technology finally took off. The product of that challenge, the Prius, hit the American market in 2000 and has led the green-car charge ever since, helping Toyota garner a whopping 79 percent of the hybrid market.

The Prius’ tantalizing mileage (45 highway, 48 city) makes the rest of the field look bad: Most current hybrids top out in the upper 20s to low 30s. The 2009 Chevrolet Malibu hybrid sedan earns a combined city/highway rating of 29 mpg, just three miles better than its conventional counterpart. The Lexus GS 450h, a larger luxury sedan, clocks in at 23. And the eight-cylinder, four-wheel-drive Chevy Tahoe SUV? Try 20.

The industry says that hybrid drivers need to be a lot better behind the wheel, since these vehicles require a whole new way of thinking—and handling. Unlike conventional cars, hybrids get their best mileage in stop-and-start city driving, since the electric motor kicks in at low speeds and the engine shuts off instead of idling. They also get a boost from “regenerative braking”—the transfer of energy from the brakes to the battery packs. Many drivers find themselves having to adopt a gentler driving style: no slamming on the brakes, no gunning the gas and embracing the fine art of coasting.

But drivers aren’t the only ones struggling to get it right. Critics point out that many carmakers have adapted the technology to some of their least efficient and highest-priced vehicles: full-size SUVs and luxury cars. Instead of going with the six-cylinder Yukon SUV, GM gave the less economical eight-cylinder model a hybrid engine. At Lexus, the eco-minded driver can choose from only three models, including the RX 400h SUV—hardly a fuel sipper at 25 mpg combined city and highway. Makers went for “low-hanging fruit,” says engineer Kliesch. GM’s Executive Director of Hybrid Powertrains Larry Nitz acknowledges that large SUVs are his company’s “historical strength,” but putting hybrid technology in them “makes the most sense” because those vehicles consume the most fuel. Problem is, they barely sell. GM’s hybrid full-size SUVs (at nearly $50,000 a pop) move just a few hundred units a month, compared with more than 10,000 monthly Priuses. And that, Kliesch points out, “doesn’t save the country much gas.”

Indeed, manufacturers still seem to be scratching their heads about what sells. Honda pulled the plug on its hybrid Accord in 2007 after years of weak sales. Pricey and not very fuel efficient—it only got 27 mpg in city/highway driving—the car sold in far fewer numbers than its chief rivals, the Toyota Prius and Camry. “When the Accord came out, we were still in the learning stages,” says Honda spokesperson Chris Naughton. Honda has since refocused on small, highly fuel-efficient hybrids, with three new models planned for the next few years. Its lesson from the Accord? When it comes to hybrids, says Naughton, customers’ main expectation is “maximum fuel economy.”

Even if gas prices continue to decline, the outlook for more-efficient hybrids seems promising. Manufacturers, including Ford, GM, Honda and Toyota, plan to goose mileage incrementally upward with design enhancements like better aerodynamics, tires with lower rolling resistance and engine upgrades that will allow for greater use of the electric motor. The third-generation 2010 Prius, for instance, is getting a full overhaul, complete with solar panels to run the air-conditioning.

And around the corner? The first plug-in hybrids, coming from GM and Toyota. Hardly the dinky electric cars of yore that could barely get you to work, they’ll use lithium-ion batteries that can recharge from an external power source and should boost mileage into the 60s or higher. GM’s Chevy Volt, slated for 2010, goes a step further: Designed to get 40 miles on a single charge before switching to gas, its projected mileage is—fasten your seat belts—100 mpg.

Slideshow: Which Hybrids Are Worth It?

Video: A Look at Hybrid Technology


Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS ETrade
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
marketfog

9 Comments
I used to average 48 mpg with a 92 Escort doing the max speed limit from Myrtle Beach to Ct. My 86 Buick Century with V-6 and auto used to get 38 mpg for the same trip. Why can't my 01 Alero which weighs almost exactly the same as the Buick get more than 31 mpg? We had a 92 Cherokee which would easily get an additional 5 mpg if Chrysler would have put in lower ratio differentials. There would be little need for hybrids if the manufacturers would match the gearing to the engine better.
Posted by: jerpk
Don't forget about the new diesels. We just bought a Jetta aportwagen diesel are getting 45-50 mpg. Very quiet, fun to drive and fuel efficient. Change the oil every 10000 miles and maintenance free for 3 years. Should have a long engine life too.
Posted by: johnpcarsten
I noted with interest the part about the plug-in cars just around the corner that can get 100 mpg. I didn't note what the cost of the plugging in was estimated to be- Probably not free.

We need LNG vehicles here the same as those used in the oil producing countries. They save their oil so they can sell it to us. There are LNG refueling stations in the US but they are few and sparse. Equivalent cost for distance traveled is about HALF of what it costs for gasoline. THIS is worth waiting in line for!
Posted by: johnpcarsten
I noted with interest the part about the plug-in cars just around the corner that can get 100 mpg. I did'nt note what the cost of the plugging in was estimated to be- Probably not free.

We need LNG vehicles that are used in the oil producing countries. They save their oil so they can sell it to us. There are LNG refueling stations but they are few and sparse. Equivalent cost for distance traveled is about half of what it costs for gasoline. THIS is worth waiting in line for!
Posted by: jmfine
This is very complex issue and I am not sure I've seen a 'cradle to the grave' analysis of how much it costs for gasoline, methanol/ethanol, or electricity. Here one needs to consider the true cost of taxpayer subsidies to corn farmers and the cost of trucking methanol to where consumers need the fuel. Of course farmers use tons of fertilizers made from crude oil fractions to grow their corn harvest. US agriculture causes a fair amount of air pollution and water pollution from fertilizer runoff. There are 'hidden' costs associated with all 'green' fuels.
The cost of the Iraq War, and the cost in time and money of increased airport security is the hidden part of what every US taxpayer is paying for every gallon of gasoline, whether they have a car or not. Electricity too has many hidden costs and subsidies. Coal- and gas-fired power generation cause significant CO2 emissions and those massive powerlines that criss-cross the US have significant environmental and cost ...(Read more of this comment)
Advertisements