Monday March 22, 2010 12:00 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published April 21, 2009  |  A A A
Deal of the Day by Jason Kephart (Author Archive)

Big Macs and Fries: What You Pay Per Calorie

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Next
 

Even with glimmers of hope for the recovery, consumers are still cutting back — especially when it comes to dining out. But turning to some of fast food's biggest bargains in order to stretch your dollar in the recession may be one belt-tightening measure that could end up forcing you to loosen your buckle by a couple of notches.

Going out for cheap eats is an obvious way for consumers to keep their spending in check. That's why fast food restaurants are seen as a good investment in tough times. McDonald’s (MCD) and Yum! Brands (YUM), which operates Taco Bell, KFC, and Pizza Hut (among others) both reported stellar fourth quarters as proof. Bucking that trend were Burger King (BKC) and CKE Restaurants (CKR), the operator of Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. Burger King reported that it experienced “significant” traffic declines in March (it reported 1% same-store sales growth) and CKE’s same-store sales were down 2.7%. Nevertheless, that slide is still modest when compared with the double-digit losses at higher-end restaurant chains like Ruth's Hospitality Group's (RUTH) Ruth's Chris Steakhouse and Benihana (BNHN).

Bang for your buck continues to be one of the biggest selling points for fast food right now. But how much food are you really getting for your money? SmartMoney.com sought to find out which menu items are the costliest and cheapest per calorie. The results may surprise you. Looking at the cost per 100 calories of some items underscores what nutritionists have been saying for years: The cheapest calories typically aren’t the healthiest.

Here's our dish-by-dish look at some popular menu items and their total cost per 100 calories — from the most expensive to the cheapest.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Next
 

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: kinneytj
janicescott4, it is YOU who are missing the point. Nobody is saying that fast food is healthy. The article is simply saying what fast food (unhealthy or not) gives the most calories for the money. Period. Nobody is asking if its the healthy way to go. Nor is anybody asking about children and what they should be eating. Bully for you that you are a dietitian working with children, but it has no bearing on this article.
katy06

1 Comments
In response to Andovalo - "clean slice of turkey meat. In addition to that, a 6-inch turkey will keep you going for a day and it's healthy. So, I would suggest that you compare healthy fast food and have the right calories" - Well Andovalo, just think of all the nitrates Jerad's body has consumed during his 'healthy eating'. If Subway was REALLY interested in serving healthy food, they would eliminate the nitrate filled deli meat.
pae59

1 Comments
Andovalo:
Actually, of the eight McDonald's sandwiches on their nutritional list, only one exceeds 600 calories. That's the Double Quarter Pounder With Cheese at 740 calories. Subway lists their turkey sandwich at 290 calories FOR THE 6". I think the article compared a foot long, which I am not sure is a reasonable comparison. I would have to agree that a 6" turkey with everything is more filling than a MacDonald's cheeseburger (300), but who has just one cheeseburger or just the 6". And the Subway figures are without the dressing. Know anybody who actually gets the subway w/o the dressing?
janicescott4

1 Comments
Interesting article but I believe some of the comments are missing the point. I am a registered dietitian and nutrition educator for children and families. Many young parents have no idea how to prepare foods from scratch or how to shop economically. As the economy tightens, families turn to cheap fast food to fill their children's bellies. I see our role as educators in the next few years to teach easy, cheap food preparation.
Posted by: andovalo
This article is biased. There is no way that a Big Mac has less calories than a Subway turkey sandwitch. We all know that. And McDouble sandwitch doesn't have 390 calories. All McDonalds sandwitches start with over 600 calories (Big Mac is 560 calories not 540) and you keep getting hungry after 30 minutes. And of course Big Mac will cost less, because it's not even beef. Which one is cheaper, a dirty mix of kangaru meat or clean slice of turkey meat. In addition to that, a 6-inch turkey will keep you going for a day and it's healthy. So, I would suggest that you compare healthy fast food and have the right calories.
Advertisements
 
Retrieving data...

Related Quotes

MCD 66.89 Up 0.36 0.54%
YUM 37.99 Up 0.05 0.13%
BKC 20.56 Down -0.12 -0.58%
CKR 11.26 Down -0.15 -1.32%

Stock Compare

See how the stocks on this page stack up.