Tuesday February 9, 2010 7:39 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published May 6, 2008  |  A A A
Deal of the Day by AnnaMaria Andriotis (Author Archive)

5 Cities With Biggest Decline in Home Values

WITH HOME VALUES continuing to plummet across the country, it's become clear that the real estate meltdown is far from over.

Values for single-family homes in 14 major U.S. cities posted double-digit declines from their respective peaks, according to the Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices, which tracks prices of single-family homes. On a national level, home values are down 12% since December 2006. And according to Beth Ann Bovino, a senior economist at Standard & Poor's, they could drop another 10% by the end of the year.

"Things are accelerating downwards [and] in most cases the fall gets steeper and steeper every month," says David Blitzer, chairman of the index committee at Standard & Poor's.

The biggest culprit for this downturn: rampant speculation on property values during the past several years. "The areas that have seen a huge amount of speculation...are the ones that got nailed," says Blitzer. "The farther up prices went the farther down they've come." This was especially true in the Sun Belt region. Cities like Las Vegas, Miami and Phoenix, which are popular for either their beaches or deserts, lured investors looking for rental properties that would appreciate in value so they could later sell them to baby boomer retirees for a sizable profit, explains Danielle Babb, a real estate analyst and professor of economics and statistics Northcentral University in Arizona.

Foreclosures have also contributed to the decline in home values. During the first quarter, foreclosures were up 112% from the same period in 2007, according to RealtyTrac, which lists foreclosed properties. As a result, there's now a glut of homes for sale on the market and a lot of very nervous mortgage lenders reluctant to give out loans.

View our slideshow below to see the five cities that have taken the hardest hit in home values.


Las Vegas Everyone in Vegas knows that it pays to have Lady Luck on your side. Unfortunately for home buyers, Lady Luck has come and gone. Single-family-home values in Sin City rose a jaw-dropping 135% between January 2000 and September 2006. But then the winning streak ended. Home values have fallen 24.5% from their peak, the largest decline in the nation, says Blitzer.

Of course, the tables could always turn. "It's still one of the fastest growing cities...and one of the strongest economies in the nation," says Kendra Todd, real estate broker and host of HGTV's "My House is Worth What?"

Cities With Biggest Decline in Home Values

next
Chicago
Las Vegas
Miami
Miami
Phoenix
Phoenix
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
San Diego
San Diego
1
2
3
4
5
Next: Miami

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: dileepkatta
whats this fuss about home prices declining. If youre looking at a home as a place to live, what diff does it make? You may sell cheaper but also buy cheaper. Only people affected and who are crying are those looking to making quick money out if it. And those who knew they couldnt afford it but bought anyway hoping to make a profit off bank's money, with zero risk. And now they want our taxmoney to bail them out.
Posted by: perstare
I was sad to see the badly depressed home market in the Los Angeles area. I have a distant cousin who lives in Thousand Oaks, CA. I'm almost afraid to call her and ask about her house value. She did express (some years ago) that she and her husband wanted to move out of California. She may be there forever, now.
I've never been in California in my life. Who out there in the ether can give me some info as to whether Thousand Oaks suffered the same market drop as LA?
Thank you.
Mike B
perstare@promail.com
Posted by: Yellowbird5411
Why is it that people like nothing better than an opportunity to point fingers at others and howl with delight when misfortune hits? Because 'other' people make poor decisions? Because 'other' people get 'greedy?' Well, my friend, count the poor decisions YOU made in the past two/three years, and then tell everyone how you would NEVER like to live in a nicer house and how YOU have never experienced 'greed' in any way. The 'That could never be me' position is only your denial of being in the human race, with all it's mistakes, miscalculations and yes, stupid thinking. There for the grace of God go you, and me. Don't look at your watch, because your times are coming, guaranteed. And there are far worse things in life than renting.
Posted by: fwsports
I shed NO tears for those who now have been tossed from the homes...that they could not pay for, lied to get, should never had purchased, etc etc etc....it is back to renting, go get em, big spender....oh and those 2 new cars you had purchased, the bank is closing in..........
Posted by: hayekcapitalist
The theoretical market value of a house at any given time is a very weak metric for the value of a home and to extrapolate a gien market to the whole is misleading. That being said, Sam Zell was spot-on when he recently stated that most of these people should not have been in these homes to begin with and by extension the sooner they and we acknowledege that home demand was artificially stimulated by cheap credit AND GOVERNMENT MANDATED LENDING in an attempt at social engineering the sooner the housing market can stabilize by allowing the pricing mechanism to do its ruthlessly efficient work.

Thing are not as bad as the press reports (for reasons we can speculate on), but these types of articles virtually guarantee that the housing market has found a bottom.
Advertisements