Sunday November 22, 2009 7:15 PM ET
SmartMoney
Published January 10, 2008  |  A A A
Consumer Action by Aleksandra Todorova (Author Archive)

How Those With Underwater Mortgages Can Stay Afloat

THERE'S HARDLY A homeowner out there who doesn't cringe at the thought of how far their home's value has sunk over the past year. But for those who find that they owe their mortgage lender more than their home is actually worth, things can get especially painful.

Folks with these "underwater" mortgages who are already having trouble making their payments may feel as if they have nowhere to turn. Pending mortgage rate resets, mounting debt and eventual foreclosure seems inevitable.

That's largely because despite well-publicized efforts on both the federal and, in some cases, state level to help homeowners facing mortgage rate resets, no aid is being extended to those whose homes have negative equity.

But while conventional "exit" options — selling the home or refinancing into an affordable mortgage — seem difficult or downright impossible when you're "underwater" on your mortgage, many banks are now offering solutions that help homeowners do just that.

The exact number of folks with negative equity is hard to determine, but the figure could easily exceed one million. A study by FirstAmerican CoreLogic, a real estate data analysis firm, estimates that 11% of homes purchased between 2004 and 2006 (not only the peak of the housing market, but also the period during which most no-money-down loans were issued) are currently underwater. Needless to say, that percentage will only grow larger should housing values continue to fall.

The good news is that lenders are becoming increasingly willing to help these homeowners avoid foreclosure. That should continue to be the case, as long as the high number of foreclosures continues to leave banks with a glut of repossessed homes, which is an expensive proposition: Not only do the lenders suffer losses on the loans for these homes, but they have to maintain and market them to potential buyers, as well.

"You'll see more and more lenders helping people stay in their homes over the long run," says Todd Mark, a vice president of education at Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Greater Dallas, a HUD-approved housing counseling organization.

1
2
3
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: bibichgo
To selr
Yes you're right. Things do happen to people who are on top of things. Real Estate went bonkers and many people were trying to make money quickly(the flip) or live beyond ones means. Your plan is a good one. Supply/Demand. No one wants. No one buys. No one wins. We are at equilibrium again and prices drop and banks loose.
To jc-vista
That's right. Who is punishing the banks? Why aren?t the banks held accountable? Why do they get to write this off and we have to declare a 1099 (yeah I know, A law passed). Big Deal. You know. This reminds me of The Beginning of The Great Depression. The banks tanked and so did the Stock Market. This is not your typical cyclical business cycle.
Posted by: jc-vista
Certainly everyone should rightfully blame the lenders. They have laws which protect them from their misdeeds. Get rid of title 11 1322(b)(2). Make it also that lenders cannot get more than the house if they foreclose and cannot come after the borrower they took away the home from. Logic, since they took the home, the person must find and pay for another place to live. The lender could adjust the loans to make default from happening. They do not! Take away the regulations which guarantee them profit for sticking someone to live with relatives, several friends or whatever is needed since they would have to pay back for having nothing. Those loans for sub-prime should be marked as unlawful and across the board rewritten to feasible alternative conditions.
Posted by: selr
Things do happen to even the smartest and at one time financially comfortable people. It is the economy right now, the loss of jobs, incomes being lost forcing people out of their homes. Everything has gone up in price, not value, except our homes. If you are one of the LUCKY ones to be able to hold on right now great, if not you are 'SOOL'. The mortgage companies say they are willing to help but I personally have been turned down, turned away and told sorry, go to family or friends for help. I'd rather sell or walk away, just like everyone else. Leave the banks holding enough empty homes to maintain and they will change their attitudes. I say we all walk away and leave them hanging out to dry. Thank you Countrywide, for NOTHING!!! Countrywide has the worst attitude of all. NO suggestion, no empathy, no deal...
Posted by: bibichgo
To rgoldst
I'm not looking to blame anyone. If the banks would have kept their standards of 20% down or no loan, or if the banks would have looked at income verification forms closely, they would not have approved my parents and I wouldn't be in this mess. Face the facts, banks saw a chance to lend to people who wouldn't read those 20 or so pages and they stuck it to them: rich and educated taking advantage of poor and ignorant. It's and old story that goes way back. So now the banks, you, the consumer, and the economy will bear the burden. Can't wait till you have some foreclosures on your block and watch you property tank.
Posted by: rgoldst
Everyone wants to blame the 'greedy lending institutions' however everyone also signed 15 to 20 pages explaining exactly the terms and penilties for borrowing the money to purchase their homes.

It seems to me that people always look for a scape goat and I don't think that blaming thier current bad fortune in the housing market on the lenders is fair.
In fact if you took an adjustable rate or another one of those loans where you can get in very cheaply then you made a bad decision and didn't take into consideration that the housing market could decline like it does every 8 to 10 years.

The lenders really don't owe the borrowers anything and if they should try to help you be grateful because it isn't and shouldn't be thier responsibility,
Advertisements