Tuesday February 9, 2010 4:18 PM ET
SmartMoney
A A A
10 Things by SmartMoney Magazine Staff (Author Archive)

10 Things Home Builders Won't Tell You

Below is an excerpt from the book "1,001 Things They Won't Tell You," which was published in May 2009 and highlights popular columns from SmartMoney's long-running "10 Things" feature.


1. “I’ll build your house on marshmallow.”

Population growth and urban sprawl mean there’s not much residential land left in many areas these days—and what there is may not be ideal. Shortly after John Duffy and his family moved into their $234,000 home in Highlands Ranch, Colo., long cracks started showing up in the walls and the porch started pulling away from the house. After badgering his builder for the soil report, Duffy learned his lot was a hot spot for potential swell. (Writer Homes, the builder, was ordered to pay Duffy $544,000. John Palmeri, Writer’s attorney, says the company offered to fix the Duffys’ house, but “they were bent on going to court.”)

The Duffy family isn’t alone. In fact, a number of homes today are being built on “expansive soil”—earth that swells when it rains—without adequate safeguards. How common is the practice? About 50 percent of homes in Southern California are built on expansive soil, according to Patrick Catalano, founder of The Law Firm of Catalano and Catalano in San Francisco and San Diego, which specializes in real estate and construction defect litigation.

But soil isn’t the only issue when it comes to shoddy construction. In October 2007, four hillside homes built in La Jolla, Calif., slipped off their foundations, burying two other dwellings in an alley below, after a landslide that damaged some 111 homes. Catalano, who’s representing the owners of 25 of these homes, says that in about 20 percent of cases, the home builder is at fault, since the landslide occurred within 10 years of the home being built. (These cases are pending.)

2. “I won’t just cut corners—I’ll sever them.”

Substandard work has always existed in home building, but the collapse of the housing market and the increased costs of construction are making the problem worse, says Jonathan Alpert, a retired Tampa, Fla., attorney who represented homebuyers. Alpert says he’s handled cases in which builders didn’t seal roofs, in which two-inch concrete slabs have been used instead of the four-inch slabs specified, and in which sewage pipes have been cross-connected to drinking-water pipes.

In some cases, builders are skipping steps dictated by municipal building codes. In one Sarasota, Fla., gated community called Turtle Rock, four families cut open their houses in 1998 to ferret out the source of some mold growth. What they found, in addition to wet lumber, were several code violations, including missing hurricane straps, which are steel plates that tie the wood frame together and to the concrete base. Says Brian Stirling, the structural engineer hired by the homeowners to investigate, “If we’d had a strong storm, they would have had some serious problems.” Like what? “Like losing their top floor.” In 1999 the builder, U.S. Home, agreed to buy back the four houses and said it would make county-supervised repairs on 12 others in the subdivision. “We dispute the extent of the problems,” says the builder’s attorney, Fred Zinober. But by settling the case, he says, “U.S. Home did the right thing.”

“It used to be during the housing boom that builders were cutting corners because they were putting things up as quickly as they could stand,” Alpert says. Now the issues are inflationary pressures on builders and the need to increase profits. “The cost per square foot for construction is actually increasing while home prices are decreasing,” Alpert says, “so that’s putting pressure on builders to cut corners.”

3. “This is a rogue’s industry.”

Given how complicated it is to build a home, and how serious the implications are if it’s done incorrectly, you might expect home builders to answer to rigorous regulatory authority. Think again. According to the most recent survey by the National Association of State Contractors Licensing Agencies, only 18 of the association’s 27 member states regulate home builders. And of those member states that do regulate, only 15 require any kind of exam—Arizona and Maryland being two of them—and only 13 require on-the-job experience. Two states, Louisiana and Utah, have continuing-education requirements, but they’re the exception.

But greater regulation comes with a price. “Red tape and compliance issues add cost to building a new home,” says Carlos Gutierrez, assistant staff vice president for the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). “And that cost is inevitably passed on to the consumer in the form of a higher-priced home.” While he acknowledges that some regulation of the industry is necessary, even welcome, Gutierrez adds that “at a time when affordable housing continues to be a crisis nationwide, governments ought to be careful not to overregulate.”

1,001 Things They Won't Tell You

1
2
3
Next

Follow SmartMoney on Facebook, Twitter & More: Facebook Twitter
Bookmark and Share RSS
Order ReprintsOrder Reprints
User Comments
Posted by: Brokerblogger
My builder delivered a "Cleaner Upper" and a "Fixer Upper" because he legally was able to do that. Probably other tract home builders also have a "Substatial Completion" clause in their "Agreement of Sale" that basically says they can deliver an unfinished house (e.g. = "exterior concrete, driveways, final grading and exterior painting") as long as the house has an "occupancy permit" issued by "the local building authority", or "when the Home is otherwise habitable". The builder decides when the house is "habitable"! My "Settlement" clause says: "If we agree to allow You to postpone Settlement, You agree to pay Us an amount equal to one-thirteenth of 1% of the Purchase Price for each day that Settlement is postponed." So, while the builder agrees to "complete unfinished work" ASAP, they decide what "ASAP" actually means! We got many excuses why some things took so long. For details of our one year of aggivation with much of our time wasted before all 100 problems got fixed, see ...(Read more of this comment)
onlyintexas

2 Comments
I have seen the complaints first hand as far as the states Nancy has spoken about. Licensing is just another name for TRCC.
As far as I am concerned nothing less than a HOME LEMON LAW should prevail. If a new house is not built correctly, it gets bought back-period. If the builder does not agree with that they would be heavily fined and no more building for them. We are not talking about a toaster here.
A LEMON LAW has worked very well for consumers in the auto industry, it would do just as well in the construction industry. Think of the time builders would put into building a home right the first time knowing, if it is defective it WILL be bought back. That is truly a consumer protection law.
Posted by: wcaswell
HOT (Homeowners of Texas): Our biggest worry after Texas lawmakers voted to abolish the TRCC is that the builders will try to replace it with another agency they control, one that "looks" like licensing and consumer protection. Their 2009 bill to extend the TRCC included the words "builder licensing" but made a mockery of the concept by granting existing builders an automatic license and having minimal continuing education requirements and no real enforcement teeth or insurance requirements. Our licensing bill would have added all of that and would have been administered by an agency they couldn't control as easily.
nancyseats

2 Comments
#3 'This is a rogue's industry.' It's quite true that AZ and MD have decent licensing laws -- the problem is that they are not being properly enforced. HADD www.hadd.com has as many serious builder complaints from those states as from the states with no licensing at all. Maybe they have the fox guarding the hen house?

It is interesting that the NAHB ALWAYS claims they are over regulated and that ALL regulation adds to the cost of a house. The truth is that the lack of building code enforcement by cities, and enforcement by the states that do have good licensing laws, has allowed massive amounts of deficient construction to occur all over this nation. Sadly once the dry wall is up it is nearly impossible for a prospective home buyer to know that they are purchasing a financial disaster.

Only then do they learn that the warranty the builder "gave" them for his protection only, not the buyers, is illusory and has a predispute madatory binding arbitration clause.
Posted by: emtyn1
I really have forgotten how I learned this, whether it was during my brief real estate career or when I paid to have my ductwork cleaned. My children had allergies, so after we were in the house several years, we paid to have the ductwork vacuumed out. When you buy a new house, you have this illusion of getting something pristine, top to bottom--with clean air ducts. Not so. During the course of construction all kinds of dust, dirt, sawdust, and whatever gets in the air ducts. A pissed off construction worker could throw his lunch trash in there for all you know. This is not cleaned out for your benefit by the builder before you move in. If you want clean air ducts, you better pay a separate contractor to do it.
Advertisements