You probably already know how an inaccurate credit score can cause you problems — but what about your “identity score”?
Though most consumers aren’t familiar with this type of rating, it’s increasingly being used by everyone from car dealers and banks to utilities and wireless service providers. Much as a credit score attempts to put a number on how good someone is at paying their bills, an identity score measures the risk that a consumer isn’t who they say they are.
Companies that sell ID scores say their products serve as a weapon to combat that fraud by helping to predict the likelihood of identity theft, which by some estimates cost consumers and businesses $48 billion last year. Already, such scores are used before most credit-card transactions or loan applications are approved -- and their use is expected to spread. Thanks to new regulations, most businesses will soon be required to use ID scores or some other type of methodology to confirm a customer's identity.
But the growing use of identity scoring is raising some questions, too. Some privacy advocates say the expansion of efforts to compile incredibly detailed consumer dossiers is troubling. Others say the scope of identity theft has been exaggerated -- in terms of losses to both businesses and consumers. And then there's the issue of accuracy: If some of the data used to calculate a score are wrong — due to errors in one’s credit report, for example — the score will be wrong as well.
A bad identity score — justly or not — is likely to create a number of issues for consumers, ranging from the inconvenience of having to answer some annoying questions when applying for credit to having important purchases or bank transfers slowed or put on hold for a matter of days while thorough ID verification takes place.
Companies that calculate and sell these scores say they're beneficial to businesses and consumers alike. As for privacy concerns, they say that consumers' personal information is never sold or shared with third parties. Some also say identity scores measure identity risk much more accurately than credit scores measure credit risk.
“Credit scores and identity scores should not be viewed with the same lens,” says Thomas Oscherwitz, chief privacy officer at San Diego-based ID Analytics, one of the companies that provide identity scores. “They have different purposes and are calculated differently.” Heather Grover, senior director of product management at Experian’s fraud and identity solutions group, says that consumers can make sure their identity score is accurate by disputing any erroneous information in their credit reports.
While nowhere near as big as the market for credit scores, ID scoring is becoming a fast-growing field. Players include FICO, which offers its Falcon product for scoring credit-card transactions; Experian's Precise ID, which is used to determine the fraud risk of new account applications; and ID Analytics'sID score, which is sold to companies directly and through partnerships with credit bureaus Equifax and TransUnion. It’s an industry estimated at $1 billion a year -- just from the credit-card issuers alone, according to Brian Riley, research director at financial services research firm TowerGroup.
Thanks to federal regulations scheduled to take effect Aug. 1, that market is only expected to grow. This so-called Red Flags rule will require any business that conducts transactions or extends payment terms to consumers (such as lawyers, retailers or telecom outfits) to have a system in place to identify and resolve red flags that a transaction or application is fraudulent, says Oscherwitz of ID Analytics who helped draft the rules five years ago as a staffer at the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security.
Of course it's some goober who helped write the law who is now running a company that will make lots of $$ (or so he hopes) off the nuamces of the law.
Just like the credit reporting companies, this new outfit will make 100s if not 1000s of errors which will cost people who had noting to do with this stupid idea, who do not and will not benifit from it nor can they (and all the rest of you) get out of it's clutches.
People will have to spend hours and hours of their free time dealing with drones, who, by the way are on the clock and are drones because this jerk isn't going to pay people too much $$ to tell people "No", "can't", "he's out", etc. It'll be like dealing with the phone company except these losers will hae the ability to screw over you like you can't imagine - all with no fear of penalty.
Keep in mind that the people who work for this guy and those of his ilk, are your neighbors, family ...(Read more of this comment)